Sborník 2009 díl 2. - Fakulta informatiky a managementu - Univerzita ...
Sborník 2009 díl 2. - Fakulta informatiky a managementu - Univerzita ... Sborník 2009 díl 2. - Fakulta informatiky a managementu - Univerzita ...
Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLUSTERS-SUPPORTING POLICIES IN CHOSEN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE COUNTRIES Cluster mapping programme identified three main groups of cluster types in Czech Republic: the “brownfield” cluster, building on Czech industry tradition often with the help of foreign direct investment, the “greenfield” cluster, whether foreignor domesticdriven, and the “bottom-up” cluster, driven by SMEs seeking to respond to competitive pressures.[2, s.187] Brownfield clusters In the past, the Czech Republic has had particular cluster strengths in the areas of metallurgy and mining, engineering and the textile industry. A typical example is the complex of coal mining, metallurgy and heavy engineering in North Moravia, which has been in existence for more than 150 years. These clusters are currently undergoing a process of transformation in the light of EU membership and globalisation. They can be labelled “brownfield clusters”. Individual firm clusters often create multiclusters on a higher level. An example from the present time are the interfirm networks around the coal mining company OKD in Ostrava, including enterprises focused on coal mining and processing, and the metallurgical association Hutnictvi Zeleza in Prague, which coordinates the activities of metallurgical enterprises. Another example can also be a country-wide network of suppliers, sellers and other enterprises linked to the SKODA automotive company, operating through a supra-national network of enterprises around Volkswagen group companies. Each of these clusters builds on production structures from the times of the centrally-planned economy. Bottom-up clusters The third cluster type in the Czech Republic is clusters created by SMEs, developing through a bottom-up process of evolution. The Czech government and regional institutions support these processes of small firm cluster creation in various ways. One example would be the foundation of smaller industrial and technological parks (0.1–0.5 km2) and the SME support provided by various national and regional programmes. While the cluster concept is still relatively new in the Czech Republic, a lot of governmental programmes are targetting entrepeneurial co-operation and SME development in general. The Society of Technology Parks, the counselling agency Czech Venture Partners and the Czech Innovation Centre among others provide general support for enterprises. The Czech Agency for Foreign Investments (Czechinvest) stands out as an important actor in FDI-driven cluster development co-ordinating the foundation of industrial zones and searching for strategic investors. Summary The economies of the CEEC countries have undergone a period of tremendous structural change. And this change creates both chances and threats for them. Clusters created in Central and Eastern Europe Countries carry on the consequences of the economic transformation. It makes them different from those in Western Europe or the United States. As a data listed above shows the chosen central Europe countries have different potential of clusters on its teritory. Depending on the mapping method the survey shows different types of business concentration forms. And not all of them can be called clusters. But economic policies at the national level tend to foster cluster development. 168
Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLUSTERS-SUPPORTING POLICIES IN CHOSEN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE COUNTRIES Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic review various policy tools and initiatives to foster cluster development directly or indirectly. Some good practices, such as Slovenia’s top-down/ bottom-up approach forming both inter-ministerial and inter-firm networks, Hungary’s Pannon Growth initiative offering an integrated concept of regional development, the Czech co-operative cluster model and the Polish regionalbased innovation approach stand out. Clusters can be used in many ways to pursue a variety of economic policy goals. In the context of the case studies, one can identify five policy goals where a cluster approach could prove to be useful: • the upgrading of competitiveness of national industry, • local and regional development, • the fostering of innovation, • SME support. Overall, while central European countries use the cluster approach to achieve similar goals as other countries around the world, it is important to take the post-communist context into account when designing, implementing and assessing cluster policies in central, eastern and south east Europe. References: [1] Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, OECD Proceedings 1999 [2] Business Clusters, Promoting Enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe, OECD 2005, http://new.sourceoecd.org/transitioneconomies/9264007105, ISBN 92-64- 00710-5 [3] KETELS, C. The Development of the Cluster Concept – present experiences and recent developments, Prepared for the NRW Department of Economics Workshop at the Institute for Industry and Technology, Duisburg 2003 [4] KETELS, SOLVELL, Clusters in the EU-10 New Member Countries, Europe Innova Cluster Mapping 2006 [5] PORTER, M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press. 1990 [6] PORTER, M. On Competition, Harvard Business School Press. 1998 [7] SOLVELL, LINDQVIST, KETELS. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook, Ivory Tower: Stockholm 2003, www.cluster-research.org, ISBN 91-974783-1-8 [8] SOLVELL, LINDQVIST, KETELS. Cluster Initiatives in Developing and Transition Economies, Center for Strategy and Competitiveness, Stockholm 2006. 169
- Page 118 and 119: Jarosław Olejniczak, Dorota Bednar
- Page 120 and 121: Jarosław Olejniczak, Dorota Bednar
- Page 122 and 123: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 124 and 125: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 126 and 127: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 128 and 129: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 130 and 131: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 132 and 133: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 134 and 135: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 136 and 137: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 138 and 139: Jan Pelikán, Jan Fábry, Jiří He
- Page 140 and 141: Jan Pelikán, Jan Fábry, Jiří He
- Page 142 and 143: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 144 and 145: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 146 and 147: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 148 and 149: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 150 and 151: Ctibor Pilch ETICKÝ KÓDEX FINANČ
- Page 152 and 153: Ctibor Pilch ETICKÝ KÓDEX FINANČ
- Page 154 and 155: Ctibor Pilch ETICKÝ KÓDEX FINANČ
- Page 156 and 157: MANAŽERSKÁ KONCEPCE BYROKRACIE MA
- Page 158 and 159: Monika Piskorzová MANAŽERSKÁ KON
- Page 160 and 161: Monika Piskorzová MANAŽERSKÁ KON
- Page 162 and 163: Monika Piskorzová MANAŽERSKÁ KON
- Page 164 and 165: Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLU
- Page 166 and 167: Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLU
- Page 170 and 171: JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGENCE AFRICKÝCH
- Page 172 and 173: Irena Pokorná JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGE
- Page 174 and 175: Irena Pokorná JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGE
- Page 176 and 177: Irena Pokorná JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGE
- Page 178 and 179: ŘÍZENÍ PROCESŮ REGIONÁLNÍHO R
- Page 180 and 181: Petr Ponikelský ŘÍZENÍ PROCESŮ
- Page 182 and 183: PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR ROLE
- Page 184 and 185: Renata Przygodzka PUBLIC ORGANIZATI
- Page 186 and 187: Renata Przygodzka PUBLIC ORGANIZATI
- Page 188 and 189: Renata Przygodzka PUBLIC ORGANIZATI
- Page 190 and 191: Małgorzata Rutkowska, Joanna Szyma
- Page 192 and 193: Małgorzata Rutkowska, Joanna Szyma
- Page 194 and 195: TAB. 4: Behandlungsrichtungen im He
- Page 196 and 197: ZRÓŻNICOWANIE EFEKTYWNOŚCI GOSPO
- Page 198 and 199: Adam Sadowski ZRÓŻNICOWANIE EFEKT
- Page 200 and 201: Adam Sadowski ZRÓŻNICOWANIE EFEKT
- Page 202 and 203: Adam Sadowski ZRÓŻNICOWANIE EFEKT
- Page 204 and 205: Hana Scholleová INOVACE V ČR V HO
- Page 206 and 207: Hana Scholleová INOVACE V ČR V HO
- Page 208 and 209: Hana Scholleová INOVACE V ČR V HO
- Page 210 and 211: Hana Scholleová INOVACE V ČR V HO
- Page 212 and 213: Pavel Schránil NĚKTERÉ PROBLÉMY
- Page 214 and 215: Pavel Schránil NĚKTERÉ PROBLÉMY
- Page 216 and 217: Eva Schwartzhoffová ROZVOJ PODNIK
Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLUSTERS-SUPPORTING POLICIES IN CHOSEN CENTRAL<br />
AND EASTERN EUROPE COUNTRIES<br />
Cluster mapping programme identified three main groups of cluster types in Czech<br />
Republic: the “brownfield” cluster, building on Czech industry tradition often with the<br />
help of foreign direct investment, the “greenfield” cluster, whether foreignor domesticdriven,<br />
and the “bottom-up” cluster, driven by SMEs seeking to respond to competitive<br />
pressures.[2, s.187]<br />
Brownfield clusters<br />
In the past, the Czech Republic has had particular cluster strengths in the areas of<br />
metallurgy and mining, engineering and the textile industry. A typical example is the<br />
complex of coal mining, metallurgy and heavy engineering in North Moravia, which has<br />
been in existence for more than 150 years. These clusters are currently undergoing a<br />
process of transformation in the light of EU membership and globalisation. They can be<br />
labelled “brownfield clusters”. Individual firm clusters often create multiclusters on a<br />
higher level. An example from the present time are the interfirm networks around the<br />
coal mining company OKD in Ostrava, including enterprises focused on coal mining<br />
and processing, and the metallurgical association Hutnictvi Zeleza in Prague, which<br />
coordinates the activities of metallurgical enterprises. Another example can also be a<br />
country-wide network of suppliers, sellers and other enterprises linked to the SKODA<br />
automotive company, operating through a supra-national network of enterprises around<br />
Volkswagen group companies. Each of these clusters builds on production structures<br />
from the times of the centrally-planned economy.<br />
Bottom-up clusters<br />
The third cluster type in the Czech Republic is clusters created by SMEs, developing<br />
through a bottom-up process of evolution. The Czech government and regional<br />
institutions support these processes of small firm cluster creation in various ways. One<br />
example would be the foundation of smaller industrial and technological parks (0.1–0.5<br />
km2) and the SME support provided by various national and regional programmes.<br />
While the cluster concept is still relatively new in the Czech Republic, a lot of<br />
governmental programmes are targetting entrepeneurial co-operation and SME<br />
development in general. The Society of Technology Parks, the counselling agency<br />
Czech Venture Partners and the Czech Innovation Centre among others provide general<br />
support for enterprises. The Czech Agency for Foreign Investments (Czechinvest)<br />
stands out as an important actor in FDI-driven cluster development co-ordinating the<br />
foundation of industrial zones and searching for strategic investors.<br />
Summary<br />
The economies of the CEEC countries have undergone a period of tremendous<br />
structural change. And this change creates both chances and threats for them. Clusters<br />
created in Central and Eastern Europe Countries carry on the consequences of the<br />
economic transformation. It makes them different from those in Western Europe or the<br />
United States.<br />
As a data listed above shows the chosen central Europe countries have different<br />
potential of clusters on its teritory. Depending on the mapping method the survey<br />
shows different types of business concentration forms. And not all of them can be called<br />
clusters. But economic policies at the national level tend to foster cluster development.<br />
168