Sborník 2009 díl 2. - Fakulta informatiky a managementu - Univerzita ...
Sborník 2009 díl 2. - Fakulta informatiky a managementu - Univerzita ... Sborník 2009 díl 2. - Fakulta informatiky a managementu - Univerzita ...
Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF REDUCING THE PRICE RISK CONNECTED WITH TRANSACTIONS IN AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PRODUCTS IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS ON THE EXAMPLE OF GRAIN MARKET to PLN 840/t. Variation of these prices on the scale a year was quite different than in case of previously analysed markets. The highest variation was recorded in 2005/2006 and 2006/2007 – 10.37%, and 13.16%, respectively. In the subsequent year, the prices were much more stable, and the coefficient of their variation amounted to 5.24% only. On the scale of a year, weekly market prices were also, to a large degree, unpredictable. After harvests, the level of these prices was lowest on the scale of a farming year. However, in the subsequent weeks, these prices fluctuated considerably. For example, in 2007/2008, a significant increase in prices of wheat for human consumption was recorded in August and September. In the subsequent months – till December, the prices kept decreasing to achieve the maximum level in the period from March to April. In 2004/2005 and 2005/2006, before next harvests, the prices were slightly increasing, while in 2006/20007 and 2007/2008 they were strongly decreasing. Similar trends are observed in the market of fodder barley. In the market of fodder corn, price movements were even more unpredictable. For example, in 2006/2007, a considerable increase in prices was observed after harvests, and then a longer period of relative price stabilization took place, while from August, a rapid increase was recorded. In the subsequent year, the course of price changes was quite different and in the period before subsequent harvests, a gradual decrease in prices took place. Therefore, protection against price variations would be advisable, also because of unpredictable price movements on the scale of a year. Possibilities of reducing the price risk on the Warsaw Commodity Exchange (WGT) In Poland, commodity exchanges have started to be created since 1992. In the first year of their operation, such exchanges conducted, first of all, spot cash transactions. In various periods, a different number of exchanges were registered – from 40 in 1992 to 19 in 1998 (however, this does not mean that all of them were operating). In fact, most of the operating exchanges were exchanges only in name, because the transactions entered there and their organization did not fulfil the criteria of the exchange business. In this period, ¾ of sales was concentrated in Poznań, Olsztyn, Warszawa, Lublin and Gdańsk Exchanges. In this period, there were observed first attempts to introduce futures and options contracts for agricultural products, however, turnover of such products was not continuous. Trade in these contracts was of a speculating character, so they rather could not be used for securing transaction prices in the cash market. Warsaw Commodity Exchange (WGT) was established in 1995 as the last commodity exchange in Poland after marketization of the economy in 1989. Even the Poznań Commodity Exchange, which was established three years earlier, was much more organizationally advanced. However, the new law, introduced in 2002, concerning operation of commodity exchanges, broker’s office, and warehouses, caused that only WGT met, in particular, capital requirements and only this exchange remained in the Polish market. The steps taken towards consolidation of the exchanges existing in Poland have also failed. Whereas, since 2001, consolidation of the exchange transactions market has taken place. On WGT, there have been introduced futures contracts for basic agricultural products, such as wheat for human and animal consumption, and slaughter pigs. In the initial period of WGT operation, there were attempts to introduce futures contracts for other agricultural products, among other things, for slaughter cattle. A limited amount of 126
Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF REDUCING THE PRICE RISK CONNECTED WITH TRANSACTIONS IN AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PRODUCTS IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS ON THE EXAMPLE OF GRAIN MARKET futures contracts for agricultural products is not surprising. Accession of Poland to EU resulted in introduction of new intervention instruments and in stabilization of many agricultural markets, which definitely limits the activity of a commodity exchange. Besides, on Polish commodity exchanges, also before accession of Poland to EU, there was a lack of entities willing to enter futures transactions and such markets have never developed well enough. At present, this market is practically not functioning, waiting for new legal regulations connected with conducting futures and options transactions. In this situation, the possibility of using hedging transactions on other European exchanges, for example, in Budapest or on the Matif Exchange, should be considered. However, analyses of variations in the prices in the grain market in Poland, as well as in the prices of transactions on other European exchanges indicate that these variations not always have similar directions and similar dynamics – which is a basic condition of effective realization of hedging transactions. Thus, Polish farmers and processors cannot protect themselves effectively with the use of exchange mechanisms, neither in the domestic exchange nor in other European exchanges. [3, 246-251] On the other hand, the market of exchange rate futures and options contracts on WGT keeps developing. Initially, there were introduced contracts for exchange rates of USD, EUR and CHF in relation to PLN and for the exchange rate of USD in relation to EUR (WGT’s offer in 2003). In subsequent years, this offer was considerably extended, covering next currencies important for Polish importers and exporters: CZK, HUF, GBP, JPY, CAD and AUD. In 2008, there were 19 “large” exchange rate contracts on WGT, however so-called “small” contracts (with approx. fivefold lower values) and five currency contracts settled in cash were also quoted. Besides, 5 “large” and 5 “small” options for currency futures contracts were also introduced [4]. So it seems that transactions with foreign partners can be much better protected, but only in respect of the exchange rate risk. This will be a serious problem until Poland enters into the Eurozone. Summary The analysis of variation in prices in the selected grain markets indicates that such markets are operating, to a large extent, in an unpredictable manner, and decreasing the scale of price fluctuations and regulating supply on the scale of a year would be beneficial to all participants. However, a considerable part of mechanisms decreasing this risk is still unavailable for Polish entities. The use of such mechanisms is profitable only at a large scale of activity. Taking advantage of many other instruments is not strictly connected with the scale of activity, however reaching for them depends on increased awareness and willingness of the entities operating in the market. At present, on WGT, there are very limited possibilities of securing commodity transactions in the domestic market. Much better possibilities appear in the scope of securing international contracts, because futures contracts and options for all basic currencies are present on WGT. Possibilities of hedging occur with respect to all commodities settled in the aforementioned currencies, but this is limited only to changes in currency prices, and does not apply to changes in prices of a given commodity. An exchange rate is an important element, which often conditions profitability of import and export transactions, but the purchase and sale prices of commodities are equally important. Considering limited possibilities of using other instruments decreasing the currency risk, the futures contracts seem to be the most available and flexible instrument. 127
- Page 76 and 77: Ondřej Miffek, Luboš Smutka, Mich
- Page 78 and 79: Ondřej Miffek, Luboš Smutka, Mich
- Page 80 and 81: MULTIKRITERIÁLNÍ ROZHODOVÁNÍ JA
- Page 82 and 83: Hana Mohelská, Petr Tučník MULTI
- Page 84 and 85: EFFECT OF THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL P
- Page 86 and 87: Robert Mroczek EFFECT OF THE COMMON
- Page 88 and 89: Robert Mroczek EFFECT OF THE COMMON
- Page 90 and 91: Robert Mroczek EFFECT OF THE COMMON
- Page 92 and 93: Robert Mroczek EFFECT OF THE COMMON
- Page 94 and 95: Martin Musil, Kateřina Dušáková
- Page 96 and 97: Martin Musil, Kateřina Dušáková
- Page 98 and 99: JEDNOTNÝ EURÓPSKY PLATOBNÝ PRIES
- Page 100 and 101: Ivana Nemšáková, Pavol Kolenčí
- Page 102 and 103: Ivana Nemšáková, Pavol Kolenčí
- Page 104 and 105: Mária Novysedláková, Martina Sl
- Page 106 and 107: Mária Novysedláková, Martina Sl
- Page 108 and 109: Mária Novysedláková, Martina Sl
- Page 110 and 111: Pavla Odehnalová RODINNÉ PODNIKÁ
- Page 112 and 113: Pavla Odehnalová RODINNÉ PODNIKÁ
- Page 114 and 115: WSPÓŁDZIAŁANIE JEDNOSTEK SAMORZ
- Page 116 and 117: Jarosław Olejniczak, Dorota Bednar
- Page 118 and 119: Jarosław Olejniczak, Dorota Bednar
- Page 120 and 121: Jarosław Olejniczak, Dorota Bednar
- Page 122 and 123: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 124 and 125: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 128 and 129: Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF RE
- Page 130 and 131: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 132 and 133: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 134 and 135: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 136 and 137: Alena Pauličková MEDZINÁRODNÉ V
- Page 138 and 139: Jan Pelikán, Jan Fábry, Jiří He
- Page 140 and 141: Jan Pelikán, Jan Fábry, Jiří He
- Page 142 and 143: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 144 and 145: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 146 and 147: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 148 and 149: Michal Petrůj INDIKÁTORY ÚSPĚŠ
- Page 150 and 151: Ctibor Pilch ETICKÝ KÓDEX FINANČ
- Page 152 and 153: Ctibor Pilch ETICKÝ KÓDEX FINANČ
- Page 154 and 155: Ctibor Pilch ETICKÝ KÓDEX FINANČ
- Page 156 and 157: MANAŽERSKÁ KONCEPCE BYROKRACIE MA
- Page 158 and 159: Monika Piskorzová MANAŽERSKÁ KON
- Page 160 and 161: Monika Piskorzová MANAŽERSKÁ KON
- Page 162 and 163: Monika Piskorzová MANAŽERSKÁ KON
- Page 164 and 165: Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLU
- Page 166 and 167: Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLU
- Page 168 and 169: Elżbieta Pohulak-Żołędowska CLU
- Page 170 and 171: JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGENCE AFRICKÝCH
- Page 172 and 173: Irena Pokorná JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGE
- Page 174 and 175: Irena Pokorná JE REÁLNÁ KONVERGE
Anna Olszańska POSSIBILITIES OF REDUCING THE PRICE RISK CONNECTED WITH<br />
TRANSACTIONS IN AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PRODUCTS IN DOMESTIC<br />
AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS ON THE EXAMPLE OF GRAIN MARKET<br />
to PLN 840/t. Variation of these prices on the scale a year was quite different than in<br />
case of previously analysed markets. The highest variation was recorded in 2005/2006<br />
and 2006/2007 – 10.37%, and 13.16%, respectively. In the subsequent year, the prices<br />
were much more stable, and the coefficient of their variation amounted to 5.24% only.<br />
On the scale of a year, weekly market prices were also, to a large degree, unpredictable.<br />
After harvests, the level of these prices was lowest on the scale of a farming year.<br />
However, in the subsequent weeks, these prices fluctuated considerably. For example,<br />
in 2007/2008, a significant increase in prices of wheat for human consumption was<br />
recorded in August and September. In the subsequent months – till December, the prices<br />
kept decreasing to achieve the maximum level in the period from March to April. In<br />
2004/2005 and 2005/2006, before next harvests, the prices were slightly increasing,<br />
while in 2006/20007 and 2007/2008 they were strongly decreasing. Similar trends are<br />
observed in the market of fodder barley. In the market of fodder corn, price movements<br />
were even more unpredictable. For example, in 2006/2007, a considerable increase in<br />
prices was observed after harvests, and then a longer period of relative price<br />
stabilization took place, while from August, a rapid increase was recorded. In the<br />
subsequent year, the course of price changes was quite different and in the period before<br />
subsequent harvests, a gradual decrease in prices took place. Therefore, protection<br />
against price variations would be advisable, also because of unpredictable price<br />
movements on the scale of a year.<br />
Possibilities of reducing the price risk on the Warsaw Commodity Exchange<br />
(WGT)<br />
In Poland, commodity exchanges have started to be created since 199<strong>2.</strong> In the first year<br />
of their operation, such exchanges conducted, first of all, spot cash transactions. In<br />
various periods, a different number of exchanges were registered – from 40 in 1992 to<br />
19 in 1998 (however, this does not mean that all of them were operating). In fact, most<br />
of the operating exchanges were exchanges only in name, because the transactions<br />
entered there and their organization did not fulfil the criteria of the exchange business.<br />
In this period, ¾ of sales was concentrated in Poznań, Olsztyn, Warszawa, Lublin and<br />
Gdańsk Exchanges. In this period, there were observed first attempts to introduce<br />
futures and options contracts for agricultural products, however, turnover of such<br />
products was not continuous. Trade in these contracts was of a speculating character, so<br />
they rather could not be used for securing transaction prices in the cash market.<br />
Warsaw Commodity Exchange (WGT) was established in 1995 as the last commodity<br />
exchange in Poland after marketization of the economy in 1989. Even the Poznań<br />
Commodity Exchange, which was established three years earlier, was much more<br />
organizationally advanced. However, the new law, introduced in 2002, concerning<br />
operation of commodity exchanges, broker’s office, and warehouses, caused that only<br />
WGT met, in particular, capital requirements and only this exchange remained in the<br />
Polish market. The steps taken towards consolidation of the exchanges existing in<br />
Poland have also failed. Whereas, since 2001, consolidation of the exchange<br />
transactions market has taken place.<br />
On WGT, there have been introduced futures contracts for basic agricultural products,<br />
such as wheat for human and animal consumption, and slaughter pigs. In the initial<br />
period of WGT operation, there were attempts to introduce futures contracts for other<br />
agricultural products, among other things, for slaughter cattle. A limited amount of<br />
126