aktualna pitanja forenzičko- -psihijatrijskih vještačenja
aktualna pitanja forenzičko- -psihijatrijskih vještačenja
aktualna pitanja forenzičko- -psihijatrijskih vještačenja
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
M. Goreta, I. Peko-Čović, N. Buzina, Ž. Majdančić: Aktualna <strong>pitanja</strong> <strong>forenzičko</strong>-<strong>psihijatrijskih</strong>...<br />
Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu (Zagreb), vol. 11, broj 1/2004, str. 201-216.<br />
pravnih rješenja iz glave XIV. Kaznenog zakona, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu,<br />
7:399-456.<br />
20. Schüler-Springorum, H., Berner, W., Cirullies, B., Leygraf, N., Nowara, S., Pfäfflin, F.,<br />
Schott, M., Volbert, R. (1996) Sexualstraftäter im Massregelvollzug - Grundlagen ihrer<br />
therapeutischen Behandlung und der Sicherheit der Allgemeinheit, Monatschrift fur<br />
Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 79,147-201.<br />
21. Kraus, C., Berner, W., Nigbur, A. (1999) Bezüge der “Psychopathy Checklist-Revised” (PCL-<br />
-R) zu dem DSM-III-R und ICD-10 Klassifikationen bei Sexualstraftätern. Monatschrift fur<br />
Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 82:36-46.<br />
22. Travin, S. (1994) Sex Offenders: Diagnostic Assesment, Treatment, and Realated Issues, u:<br />
Rosner, R. (ed.) Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, Chapman & Hall, New York/<br />
London, 528-534.<br />
23. Pfäfflin, F. (1978) Vorurteilstruktur und Ideologie psychiatrischer Gutachten uber<br />
Sexualstraftäter, Enke Verlag, Stuttgart<br />
24. Goreta, M. (1991) Etički aspekti <strong>psihijatrijskih</strong> <strong>vještačenja</strong> u krivičnom postupku. Soc. psih.<br />
19:59-65.<br />
25. Turković, K., Dika, M., Goreta, M., Đurđević, Z. (2001) Zakon o zaštiti osoba s duševnim<br />
smetnjama - s komentarom i prilozima, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Psihijatrijska<br />
bolnica Vrapče, Zagreb<br />
Summary<br />
216<br />
CURRENT ISSUES RELATING TO THE FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC<br />
EVALUATION OF SEXUAL DELINQUENTS<br />
Following the results obtained by foreign authors, which point to a number of specific shortcomings<br />
relating to the forensic evaluation of sexual delinquents, the authors analysed 50 case<br />
studies from the same category evaluated in the Centre for Forensic Psychiatry in PB Vrapče<br />
and conducted within the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2001. The major study<br />
instrument was a specifically developed questionnaire consisting of 40 items which, in addition<br />
to standard general, demographic, criminological and psychiatric parameters, also included 8<br />
items focusing on sexual issues. The underlying legal criterion for the inclusion of subjects in<br />
the study was the qualification of the offence as a criminal offence pursuant to one of the articles<br />
under Title XIV of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Croatia, and from a psychiatric point of<br />
view the need to confirm or to rule out a diagnosis under F64.0F66.9 according to ICD 10.<br />
The data obtained point to the frequent occurrence of the following objective and/or subjective<br />
factors which have a significant impact on the quality of evaluation in this particular area<br />
such as the missing or deficient history of illness relating to the psychosexual development of<br />
subjects; denial of the act committed; denial of any sexual psychopathology; insufficient argumentation<br />
in motivation for therapy as a crucial criterion for the recommendation of forensic<br />
treatment; missing or the lack of argumentation regarding dangerousness or any other prognostic<br />
evaluations; insufficient argumentation of the degree of reliability of the diagnosis established<br />
or other forensic evaluations, as well as any reasons for questionable diagnostic reliability.<br />
In conclusion, recommendations for the improvement of the quality of psychiatric evaluation<br />
relating to sexual delinquents are presented with special focus on the need for additional<br />
training for forensic psychiatrists, and strict respect of procedural standards while ensuring that<br />
forensic experts act within the framework of their professional competence.