Igor Graovac - Centar za politološka istraživanja
Igor Graovac - Centar za politološka istraživanja Igor Graovac - Centar za politološka istraživanja
36 O Dijalogu povjesničara/istoričara poziv, upućen prije svega akademski obrazovanim povjesničarima i ostalim stručnjacima, na 1. međunarodni znanstveni skup Dijalog povjesničara/istoričara, koji je održan potkraj 1998. u Pečuhu (u prostorijama tamošnje Mađarske akademije znanosti). I nakon toga su, 1999. i 2000. godine, održana tri daljnja skupa u Pečuhu, a u ožujku 2001. skup je prvi put održan u SRJ – u Herceg-Novome, Crna Gora – te u listopadu iste godine i u RH – u Zagrebu. Potom je 7. skup održan 2002. u Beogradu, Srbija, SRJ, a 8. skup 2003. u Zadru, RH. Ubrzo se pokazalo, unatoč dotad neznanstvenim pristupima, pa i zluradim očekivanjima, da demokratski te pluralistički dijalog i o međusobno suprotstavljenim interesima ne predstavlja nikakvu smetnju nego prigodu međusobnog obogaćenja te otvaranja novih izgleda i spoznaja. Pokazalo se, dakle, da intelektualna i liberalna diskusija u društvu i među društvima koja su upućena ka demokraciji, pluralizmu i toleranciji sama po sebi nikako ne može biti dijelom problema nego samo dijelom njegova rješenja. Danas, stoga, treba krenuti i dalje, jer nije dovoljno samo prikupljati znanstvene spoznaje niti je dovoljno te spoznaje, publiciranjem knjiga/zbornika radova sa skupova (Dijalog povjesničara/istoričara, 1-8, priredili Hans-Georg Fleck i Igor Graovac, Zagreb, FNSt, 2000., 2001., 2002. i 2003.), samo učiniti dostupnima široj javnosti. Summary Historians in South East Europe often avoided a critical dialogue on the past, or they even avoided opening a scientific dialogue on controversial issues of national, and even international significance, although opening or even training for a scientific discourse is invaluable for the political culture appropriate for a democratic society. And exactly such opening or training is the political-educational motivation, which forms the basis for the functioning of the institution of the political education of adults, which is the main task of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation/F. Naumann Stiftung. Die Stiftung für liberale Politik (FNSt). In the spring of 1998, the FNSt started sounding out the historians in the Republic of Croatia/RC and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia/FRY (and the new state of Serbia and Monte Negro later on), but primarily Serbia, to find out whether the necessity for a dialogue, even on the controversial issues of the common past, was perceived in those countries. These efforts resulted in an invitation, sent primarily to academic
Hans-Georg Fleck 37 historians and other experts, to the first international scientific conference entitled The Dialogue of Croatian and Serbian Historians, which was held at the Hungarian Academy of Science in Pecs at the end of 1998. Three further conferences were also held in Pecs after that, in 1999 and 2000. In March of 2001, the conference took place in Herceg-Novi, Monte Negro, FRY, for the first time, and then also in Zagreb, RC, in October the same year. After that, the 7th conference took place in Belgrade, Serbia, FRY, in 2002, and the 8th one in Zadar, RC, in 2003. It soon proved, despite the previous unscientific approach, and even gloating expectations, that the democratic and pluralistic dialogue, also on opposing interests, did not present a setback, but an opportunity for mutual enrichment and opening of new prospects and insights. So, it showed that an intellectual and liberal discussion in a society and among societies, which strive for democracy, pluralism and tolerance, cannot be part of the problem itself, but only part of its solution. One, therefore, needs to go even further, because it is not enough just to collect scientific insights, nor it is enough to only make these insights available to the wider public by publishing the collected papers from the conferences (Dialogue of Croatian and Serbian Historians, vol. 1-8, edited by Hans-Georg Fleck and Igor Graovac, Zagreb, FNSt, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003).
- Page 1 and 2: ČEMU DIJALOG POVJESNIČARA - ISTOR
- Page 3 and 4: SADRŽAJ Uvodne napomene (Daniela K
- Page 5: Daniela Krivda ....................
- Page 8 and 9: 8 Uvodne napomene Dijalog povjesni
- Page 10 and 11: 10 Uvodne napomene Iz tih je razlog
- Page 12 and 13: 12 Uvodne napomene RH) i urednicom
- Page 14 and 15: 14 Uvodne napomene - M. Bjelajac, J
- Page 16 and 17: 16 Uvodne napomene značajniji od n
- Page 19 and 20: “Zašto uvijek započinjati od Ad
- Page 21 and 22: Hans-Georg Fleck 21 Očevidno je pr
- Page 23 and 24: Hans-Georg Fleck 23 nosti, u prolje
- Page 25 and 26: Hans-Georg Fleck 25 u prvome koraku
- Page 27 and 28: Hans-Georg Fleck 27 neostvarivim. S
- Page 29 and 30: Hans-Georg Fleck 29 Prije no što s
- Page 31 and 32: Hans-Georg Fleck 31 voljne težnje
- Page 33 and 34: Hans-Georg Fleck 33 mi to pokušava
- Page 35: Hans-Georg Fleck 35 drei weitere Ko
- Page 41 and 42: O povijesti, ali još više o onome
- Page 43 and 44: Stjepan Mesić 43 Pritom je počinj
- Page 45 and 46: Stjepan Mesić 45 će ga biti. Taj
- Page 47 and 48: Stjepan Mesić 47 the future. But,
- Page 49: Holm Sundhaussen ..................
- Page 52 and 53: 52 Prošlost, povijest i društvo k
- Page 54 and 55: 54 Prošlost, povijest i društvo
- Page 56 and 57: 56 Prošlost, povijest i društvo Z
- Page 58 and 59: 58 Prošlost, povijest i društvo I
- Page 60 and 61: 60 Prošlost, povijest i društvo n
- Page 62 and 63: 62 Prošlost, povijest i društvo D
- Page 64 and 65: 64 Prošlost, povijest i društvo D
- Page 66 and 67: 66 Prošlost, povijest i društvo m
- Page 69: Andrej Mitrović ..................
- Page 72 and 73: 72 O prevlasti povijesnog nerazuma
- Page 74 and 75: 74 O prevlasti povijesnog nerazuma
- Page 76 and 77: 76 O prevlasti povijesnog nerazuma
- Page 78 and 79: 78 O prevlasti povijesnog nerazuma
- Page 80 and 81: 80 O prevlasti povijesnog nerazuma
- Page 82 and 83: 82 O prevlasti povijesnog nerazuma
- Page 85 and 86: Neznanje je moć! To je jedno od tr
Hans-Georg Fleck 37<br />
historians and other experts, to the first international scientific conference<br />
entitled The Dialogue of Croatian and Serbian Historians, which<br />
was held at the Hungarian Academy of Science in Pecs at the end of<br />
1998. Three further conferences were also held in Pecs after that, in<br />
1999 and 2000. In March of 2001, the conference took place in<br />
Herceg-Novi, Monte Negro, FRY, for the first time, and then also in<br />
Zagreb, RC, in October the same year. After that, the 7th conference<br />
took place in Belgrade, Serbia, FRY, in 2002, and the 8th one in Zadar,<br />
RC, in 2003. It soon proved, despite the previous unscientific<br />
approach, and even gloating expectations, that the democratic and<br />
pluralistic dialogue, also on opposing interests, did not present a setback,<br />
but an opportunity for mutual enrichment and opening of new<br />
prospects and insights. So, it showed that an intellectual and liberal<br />
discussion in a society and among societies, which strive for democracy,<br />
pluralism and tolerance, cannot be part of the problem itself, but<br />
only part of its solution. One, therefore, needs to go even further,<br />
because it is not enough just to collect scientific insights, nor it is<br />
enough to only make these insights available to the wider public by<br />
publishing the collected papers from the conferences (Dialogue of<br />
Croatian and Serbian Historians, vol. 1-8, edited by Hans-Georg Fleck<br />
and <strong>Igor</strong> <strong>Graovac</strong>, Zagreb, FNSt, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003).