Download PDF - Ivie

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX Table 1: Descriptive statistics for married couples, wife’s age: 20-50. PSID 1999-2007. Recently married (3 years or less) Non-recently married (more than 3 years) N Mean SD N Mean SD Husband's BMI (kg/m2) 1,397 27.39 4.75 5,821 27.92 4.53 Wife's BMI (kg/m2) 1,397 24.70 5.74 5,821 25.21 5.66 Husband's Obesity 1,397 0.23 0.42 5,821 0.26 0.44 Wife's Obesity 1,397 0.16 0.36 5,821 0.17 0.38 Husband's Weight (pounds) 1,397 197.05 38.15 5,821 199.66 36.49 Wife's Weight (pounds) 1,397 150.51 35.90 5,821 151.91 35.33 Husband's Height (inches) 1,397 71.05 2.92 5,821 70.84 2.83 Wife's Height (inches) 1,397 65.44 2.69 5,821 65.08 2.76 Husband's Log Earnings 1,397 10.50 0.56 5,821 10.82 0.64 Wife's Log Earnings 1,397 8.92 3.07 5,821 7.89 4.07 Husband's Age 1,397 30.88 7.54 5,821 40.34 7.90 Wife's Age 1,397 29.09 6.99 5,821 38.35 7.31 Husband's Good Health 1,396 0.96 0.19 5,821 0.95 0.22 Wife's Good Health 1,397 0.95 0.22 5,821 0.93 0.25 Husband's Education 1,328 13.69 2.14 5,821 13.72 2.28 Wife's Education 1,308 14.08 2.08 5,448 13.74 2.15 Number of children 1,397 0.75 1.00 5,821 1.46 1.11 Note: Observations have been weighted using family weights. Husband’s earnings are trimmed at $ 10,000, corresponding to the 3.5 percentile of the positive husband’s earnings distribution. 24
Table 2: Cross-Tabulations for Recently Married Couples (3 years or less) % [Number of observations] Husband’s BMI Wife’s BMI < 50% ≥50% < 50% 30.03 % [379] 20.60% [260] ≥50% 19.18% [242] 30.19% [381] Husband’s log (earnings) Wife’s BMI < 50% ≥50% < 50% 22.6% [285] 28.1% [354] ≥50% 25.1% [317] 24.2% [306] Husband’s Education Wife’s BMI < 50% (13 years or less) ≥50% (14 years or more) < 50% 21.5% [271] 29.2% [368] ≥50% 26.7% [337] 22.7% [286] 25
Page 1 and 2: ad serie WP-AD 2010 -16 Anthropomet
Page 3 and 4: WP-AD 2010-16 Anthropometry and soc
Page 5 and 6: spousal characteristics. In particu
Page 7 and 8: A large body of literature using Na
Page 9 and 10: dummy variable with a value of one
Page 11 and 12: sample using the unique household a
Page 13 and 14: comparing the recently to the non-r
Page 15 and 16: important to highlight that we obta
Page 17 and 18: Table 5 one can see that shorter wo
Page 19 and 20: 3.3. Sensitivity analysis The resul
Page 21 and 22: similar to our main findings on mar
Page 23: show additional associations that w
Page 27 and 28: Table 4: Regressions of husband’s
Page 29 and 30: Table 6: Regressions of wife’s he
Page 31 and 32: Table 8: Regressions of husband’s
Page 33 and 34: Table 10: Regressions of husband’
Page 35 and 36: Table 12: Sensitivity analysis of s
Page 37 and 38: Table 13: II. Correlation matrix am
Page 39 and 40: Cawley, J. (2004) “The impact of
Page 41 and 42: Ogden, C.L., Carroll, M.D., Curtin,
Page 43 and 44: PUBLISHED ISSUES * WP-AD 2009-01 WP
Page 45 and 46: WP-AD 2010-08 WP-AD 2010-09 WP-AD 2

Download PDF - Ivie

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?