13.07.2015 Views

Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca. Edita consilio et auctoritate ...

Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca. Edita consilio et auctoritate ...

Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca. Edita consilio et auctoritate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIPRAEFATIOMixtus ex utroque geuere est Paris<strong>in</strong>us 2062 (saec. XIV), iit qui exalterius classis codice deseriptus multis locis e libro ]\Iarciaui simillimocorrectiissit.Recentiorem aliquem secundae classis librum secutiis est qui primusanno MDXXXIV <strong>in</strong> Aldi aedibus parapbrasiu edidit, Victor Tr<strong>in</strong>cavellus;ipse novavisse admodum pauca vid<strong>et</strong>ur.Lat<strong>in</strong>e earn plus qu<strong>in</strong>quag<strong>in</strong>ta anuis ante (anno MCCCCLXXX)Hermolaus Barbarus Patrieius Ven<strong>et</strong>us expressit, qui ipse quoque librumsecundae classis adbibuisse vid<strong>et</strong>ur, quaraquam difficile saepe est ex bocliberiore translationis genere, quod Hermolaus ipse <strong>in</strong> epistula ad SixtumIV Pont. Max. data proiit<strong>et</strong>ur, cuius <strong>in</strong>fra specimen praebebo, quicquamcertiusconcludere.Quae Chr. Brandis (b) tribus fere saeculis post e parapbrasi <strong>in</strong>Scboliorum volumiue p. 195— 251 excerpsit, editionis pr<strong>in</strong>cipis texturapaene immutatum rep<strong>et</strong>unt nullis libris manu scriptis consultis^).L. Spengelii denique editio, quae Lipsiae anno MDCCCLXVI emissaest, <strong>in</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>cavelli textu posita est <strong>et</strong> lectionibus, quas P<strong>et</strong>rus Victoriusexemplari Ald<strong>in</strong>o, quod nunc <strong>in</strong> bibliotbeca Monacensi est (A gr. b 1070),e Laurentiauo LVIII 32') ascripsit. utriusque igitur familiae testis, quamvisnon semper locuples <strong>et</strong> <strong>in</strong>teger, novissimo editori praesto erat, ut,lic<strong>et</strong> saepe fides utriusque ab eo non recte perpensa <strong>et</strong> Victorian! codicisauctoritas immerito neglecta sit, edita ab eo parapbrasis multo purioratque emendatior evaserit. leviora menda baud pauca Spengelius coniciendosustulit, atque <strong>et</strong>iam eorum quae <strong>in</strong> apparatu proponere satisbabuit nonnulla recipere non dubitavi. multa sane, id quod <strong>et</strong>iam <strong>in</strong>ter-1) sed cf. p. 2-2,30 (Schol. p. 213a 1.2), 40,28 (239b 17), 60,1 (249^4.5), 63,32(250b25); nam aix'ja quidem p. 60,1 errore ortum esse non potest.2) hunc, non, quod L. Spengel Praef. p. VI suspicatus erat, Laurentianiira LXXII24 apographon codic<strong>et</strong>n Victorii fuisse vel <strong>in</strong>de appar<strong>et</strong>, quod p. 16,14 editionis Speng.ad bndp-/o-i notatur "bTzdpyiw V, post hoc defecit pag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> Y' <strong>et</strong> p. 18,30 ad to {aev ouv'hie <strong>in</strong>cipit V, itemque p. 28,2 ad oriXov 'post hoc vocabulum defecit pag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> V <strong>et</strong>p. 29,30 ad (Ye(o[Ji£)Tpia [Jiiv av 'hie <strong>in</strong>cipit denuo V, <strong>in</strong> Laurentiano autem LVIII 32post p. 10,26 o'i TioEv ydp TO, extrema folii 121v verba, folium excidit, quod cout<strong>in</strong>uitp. 10,26.27 xaTa TiavTos — 12,8 auTw cpuaews, <strong>et</strong> f. 126 p. 17,27 Igtiv ik otXXou— 19,1TTpoaft/jxY), yeiu- cont<strong>in</strong>ens postea <strong>in</strong>sertum est. maxima vero Sp. eo <strong>in</strong> errorem <strong>in</strong>duclusest, quod Laurentianus LXXII 24 <strong>in</strong> eadem verba desiuit (p. 53,24 toIs p.£v ouatv ov, Tof;oe), <strong>in</strong> quae Victorii codex desiit, Laurent, autem LVIII 32 <strong>in</strong>de demum a verbis p. 55,23.24dvayxY]; urdpy<strong>et</strong> deficit, sed cum ilium ex hoc descriptum esse const<strong>et</strong>, nihil <strong>in</strong>de aiiudcolligi potest nisi hunc <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e rautilum olim aliter exiisse. <strong>et</strong> re vera f. 155 (<strong>in</strong>c. -ot<strong>et</strong> fAEvo-jv p. 53,8) —171 item atque f. 126 saeculo XV suppl<strong>et</strong>a sunt.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!