Ogledni izvod kataloga je tukaj. - ZAPS

Lilijana Jankovič Grobelšek, univ. dipl. inž. arh.,predsednica matične sekcije prostorskih načrtovalcev /President of the Central Section of Spatial PlannersUstvarjanje prostorskih načrtovalcev v primerjavi z arhitekturnim alikrajinsko-arhitekturnim ni klasično avtorsko, čeprav je pri končni arhitekturniizvedbi zaradi usklajevanj in kompromisov prav tako mogočerazpravljati o avtorstvu.Strokovne faze dela prostorskih načrtovalcev, npr. strokovne podlage zaprostorske akte, urbanistične študije in podobno, še lahko štejemo medavtorske prispevke. Pri nadaljnjih fazah dela, pri prostorskih planskih aliizvedbenih aktih, ki so eno najpomembnejših polj ustvarjalnosti in hkratipolje družbeno pomembnega in odgovornega delovanja prostorskih načrtovalcev,pa gre za izrazito deljeno oziroma skupinsko avtorstvo. Končnoodgovornost pri prostorskih izvedbenih aktih vendarle prevzema vodjanaloge, vendar so za rezultat zaslužni (ali krivi) še naročniki, investitorji,nosilci urejanja prostora, lastniki zemljišč, neposredni sosedje in drugajavnost, občinski svet, župan ipd.Neavtorski pristop pri prostorskih aktih je celo eden ključnih temeljev zadobro vodenje projekta, ustvarjanje pogojev za konstruktivno sodelovanjeinterdisciplinarne delovne skupine in drugih sodelujočih. To seveda nepomeni, da načrtovalec v prostoru deluje brez jasne vizije. Samo dobrodomišljena in smotrna osnovna ideja ter njena ustrezna predstavitev lahkozdržita celoten postopek sprejemanja akta in se uveljavita v nadaljnjihizvedbenih projektih. Tudi tu je vloga načrtovalca izjemno pomembna.Zato je prav, da zbornica nagradi raznovrstne prostorsko-načrtovalneprispevke.Nagrada zlati svinčnik za prostorske načrtovalce in razstava Slovenskoprostorsko načrtovanje imata večplasten pomen.Prostorski načrtovalci se zazremo v svoje delo, strokovne dosežke, ki smojih (neredko ali celo praviloma s težavami) uveljavili nekje »med interesijavnosti, politike in kapitala ter v okvirih veljavne zakonodaje«, kot jenaslovljena letošnja okrogla miza ob Dnevu arhitektov. V svojem deluizberemo najboljše strokovne rešitve ali pristope ali prostorske akte injih skušamo predstaviti jasno in celovito. Tokrat se predstavljamo zborničnimkolegom, drugače smo bolj vajeni izpostavljenosti pred strokovnokompetentno javnostjo, naročniki ipd.Ob pogledu na lastno večletno produkcijo se lahko pojavijo dileme. S katerimsvojim končnim izdelkom ali strokovnim prispevkom smo pravzapravlahko toliko zadovoljni, da ga želimo predstaviti strokovni javnosti inUnlike the work of architects and landscape architects, that of a spatial planneris not the kind of work to which authorship can be easily attributed, despitethe fact that due to various amendments and compromises, authorship canalso be discussed in terms and at the stage of architectural completion. Expertphases of a spatial planner’s work, such as expert groundwork for spatial acts,studies in urban planning and the like, can still be considered as authors’work. However, in subsequent work phases, in spatial planning or implementation– which are some of the most important creative fields and, at the sametime, a field of social importance and responsibility for spatial planners – theauthorship is explicitly shared. The final responsibility in spatial implementingacts falls nevertheless to the head of the project; but the credit (or the blame)for the results goes also to the clients, investors, spatial design developers,land owners, immediate neighbours and other publics, the municipality, themayor and similar.The non-author approach in spatial acts is one of the key prerequisites forsuccessful project management, for the creation of conditions for constructivecooperation within an interdisciplinary work group and other participatingparties. This, of course, does not imply that a spatial planner works without aclear vision. Only a well though-out, soundly presented basic idea can standthe test of the entire adoption procedure and come to life through subsequentimplementing projects. The planner’s role is extremely important here as well.It is therefore only right that the Chamber should award spatial planningcontributions of various kinds.The Golden Pencil Award for spatial planners and the Slovenian Spatial Planningexhibition have multifold significance.1. We spatial planners look at our work, our professional achievements whoserealization (more often than not or even as a rule) ends somewhere “between theinterests of the public, politics and capital, and within the existing legislation”,as was expressed in the title of this year’s roundtable on Architect Day. Wechoose the best expert solutions or approaches or spatial acts for our projectsand strive to present them in a clear and comprehensive manner. We are usedto being exposed to various competent professionals, clients etc., but on thisoccasion we present our work to our peers from the Chamber.Seeing your production of several years may put you in a dilemma. Which finalproduct or professional contribution would we like to present, with pride,to the expert public and submit for an award of the Chamber? How manyimportant battles have we fought for the benefit of the public interest andwhat have we got to show for it now? How much does it count to have put a12