01.12.2012 Views

Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, broj 26 (2001) - Hrvatski filmski savez

Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, broj 26 (2001) - Hrvatski filmski savez

Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, broj 26 (2001) - Hrvatski filmski savez

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABSTRACTS<br />

Abstracts on Collaborators<br />

UDC: 791.44.071.1(497.5) Dovnikovi} B.<br />

791.43-252(497.5)<br />

Petar Krelja<br />

Stylistic Coherence of Dovnikovi}’s<br />

Opus<br />

Borivoj Dovnikovi}-Bordo had quite an interesting and<br />

unusual artistic development. He left his native town of<br />

Osijek to pursue his dream and become a cartoonist. He<br />

began his career in the weekly satiric magazine Kerempuh<br />

and this work eventually introduced him into the world of<br />

animation through the project The Big Meeting that he<br />

worked on as animator and assistant. Ever since he has<br />

remained in the world of animation, that is to say, for five<br />

decades, with only one interruption when he shortly<br />

returned to his first calling — cartoons. Thus he participated<br />

in all the evolutionary phases of the Zagreb School of<br />

Animated film.<br />

For the first eleven years he mostly collaborated on other<br />

authors’ projects. Only after many years of practice in animation<br />

did he in 1961 come out with his debut film Dolly.<br />

Since then until 1995 a number of other works followed<br />

creating an impressive author’s opus that certainly made<br />

him one the most significant and unavoidable protagonists<br />

of the Zagreb School of Animated film.<br />

The author of the text chose eleven films — Dolly (1961),<br />

Untitled (1964), Curiosity (1966), Krek (1967), Manoeuvres<br />

(1971), Second class passenger (1973), J. D. (1976), The<br />

School of Walking (1978), One Day in Life (1982), Two<br />

Lives (1984), An Exciting Love Story (1989) — which he<br />

analyses in order to reveal the basis of Dovnikovi}’s poetics.<br />

The author establishes that Dovnikovi} was influenced by<br />

Disney, newspaper cartoons and comics, and on these<br />

grounds he created his most important works.<br />

While refusing to accept that characters are one-dimensional<br />

or simple geometric shapes karyokinetically multiplied,<br />

Dovnikovi} accepts the functionality of a simplified, only<br />

slightly coloured surface. He does not hide the fact that his<br />

heroes draw roots from cartoons. Caricature free of sarcasm<br />

or bombastic and spectacular gags is a permanent characteristic<br />

of his work. His works always include a well-known<br />

nice hero of a rather bland appearance, a man from the<br />

fringes of society constantly struggling with repressive<br />

’eager’ individuals or some global destructive forces always<br />

hovering over him.<br />

200<br />

<strong>Hrvatski</strong> <strong>filmski</strong> <strong>ljetopis</strong> <strong>26</strong>/<strong>2001</strong>.<br />

Although the fact that the Zagreb school’s potentials were<br />

never fully realized, that some of its authors quickly gave up<br />

on animation (Mimica, Bourek, Marks, [talter...), while others<br />

died rather young (Grgi}, Kostelac, Vukoti}, Zaninovi},<br />

Vunak) discouraged Borivoj Dovnikovi}, he nevertheless<br />

managed to keep his place on the Croatian and world scene<br />

of animation — as one of the greatest — owing to his personal<br />

vitality and the obvious resilience of his opus that with<br />

time became only more impressive and coherent.<br />

UDC: 791.43:7.025<br />

791.43:681.3<br />

Mato Kukuljica<br />

New Electronic Technologies —<br />

Help in the Restoration of Film<br />

Material<br />

Film art has more than any other art marked the 20th century,<br />

however it is in grave danger of being completely lost<br />

or destroyed. The data about the destruction of film stock<br />

are terrifying. 90% of all the stock from the pioneering period<br />

of cinematography (made before 1910) is lost forever,<br />

along with 50% of the film stock made after the appearance<br />

of sound film (1927) and 50% of all the material made after<br />

the replacement of nitrate based film tape with a secure film<br />

tape with acetate base (in the period from 1950 till 1954).<br />

The efforts of film archivists to restore and preserve the<br />

existing material are only partially successful since they are<br />

encountering many problems, starting with technological<br />

limitations, problems of storage, lack of competent workers<br />

and institutions, specialised laboratories and finally, lack of<br />

financing. We have to add that each film needs to be<br />

restored two, three or four times during the lifetime of an<br />

archivist. In the domain of classical film storage, they are<br />

trying to produce a more stable film tape and to ensure storage<br />

conditions that would prolong the life of film stock for<br />

additional 30-50 years, but even such solutions have their<br />

limitations. Film technologies and researchers estimate that<br />

in the course of next 20-30 years another 50% of presently<br />

preserved film stock will be lost forever due to untimely<br />

protection of nitrate film footage, the spreading of vinegar<br />

syndrome on film material with celluloid base, while a part<br />

of film stock will be lost due to colour fading and deterio-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!