90. Kim JK, Kim TK, Ahn HJ Kim CS, Kim KR, Cho KS. Differentiation of subtypes ofrenal cell carcinoma on helical <strong>CT</strong> scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1499–506.91. Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T i sur. MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: its role indetermining cell type. Radiat Med 2004;22:371–6.92. Polascik TJ, Bostwick DG, Cairns P. Molecular genetics and histopathologic featuresof adult distal nephron tumors. Urology 2002;60:941–6.93. Herts BR, Coll DM, Novick AC i sur. Enhancement characteristics of papillary renalneoplasms revealed on triphasic helical <strong>CT</strong> of the kidneys. AJR Am J Roentgenol2002;178:367–72.94. Shinmoto H, Yuasa Y, Tanimoto A i sur. Small renal cell carcinoma: MRI withpathologic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:690–4.95. Storkel S, Steart PV, Drenckhahn D, Thoenes W. The human chromophobe cell renalcarcinoma: itsprobable relation to intercalated cells of the collecting duct. VirchowsArch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1989;56:237–45.96. Kondo T, Nakazawa H, Sakai F i sur. Spokewheel-like enhancement as an importantimaging finding of chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis oncomputed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies. Int J Urol2004;11:817–24.97. Srigley JR, Eble JN. Collecting duct carcinoma of kidney. Semin Diagn Pathol1998;15:54–67.98. Prasad SR, Humphrey PA, Menias CO i sur. Neoplasms of the renal medulla:radiologic pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2005;25:369–80.99. Davis CJ Jr, Mostofi FK, Sesterhenn IA. Renal medullary carcinoma: the seventhsickle cell nephropathy. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:1–11.100. Davidson AJ, Choyke PL, Hartman DS, Davis CJ Jr. Renal medullary carcinomaassociated with sickle cell trait: radiologic findings. Radiology 1995;195:83–5.101. Weber A, Srigley J, Moch H. Mucinous spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney: amolecular analysis Pathologe 2003;24:453–9.95
102. Prokop M, Galanski M, Schaefer-Prokop C, van der Molen AJ. ComputedTomography of the Body. Stuttgart:Thieme Verlag; 2002.103. Dillman JR, Caoili EM, Cohan. Multi-detector <strong>CT</strong> urography: a one-stop renal andurinary tract imaging modality. Abdom Imaging 2007;32:519–29104. Joffe SA, Servaes S, Okon S, Horowitz M. Multi–Detector Row <strong>CT</strong> Urography in theEvaluation of Hematuria. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:1441–56.105. IAEA Safety Standards. http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/documentsdefault.asp?sub=160106. Ziegler J. Significance and technique of compression of ureter in eliminationpyelography. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1930; 56:1772–5.107. Hamby WM, Kirsh IE. Urography with ureteral occlusion. JAMA 1964;189:582–4.108. Heetderks DR, Rapp R, Correa RJ, Lapides J. An improved method of excretoryurography. J Urol 1964; 92:75–7.109. Maher MM, Jhaveri KS, Lucey BC, Sahani DV, Saini S, Mueller PR. Does theadministration of saline flush during <strong>CT</strong> urography (<strong>CT</strong>U) improve ureteric distensionand opacification? A prospective study. Radiology 2001;221 Suppl:500.110. Meindl T, Coppenrath EM, Degenhardt C, Mueller-Lisse UL, Reiser M, Mueller-LisseUG. MD<strong>CT</strong> urography: experience with a biphasic excretory phase examinationprotocol. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2512-18.111. Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA. Low-dose unenhancedmultidetector <strong>CT</strong> of patients with suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol2003;180:305-11.96
- Page 1 and 2:
Središnja medicinska knjižnicaĆu
- Page 3 and 4:
Disertacija je izrađena na Zavodu
- Page 5 and 6:
SADRŽAJ1. POPIS OZNAKA I KRATICA..
- Page 7:
1. POPIS OZNAKA I KRATICABMI-body m
- Page 11 and 12:
kontrasta (26,27). Treća faza je e
- Page 13 and 14:
dok je na aksijalnim slojevima otkr
- Page 15 and 16:
hidrirani prije CTU u odnosu na gru
- Page 17 and 18:
primjenjiv i kod ostalih protokola.
- Page 19 and 20:
Dvije osnovne tehnike izvođenja MR
- Page 21 and 22:
tumorima urotrakta ili o invaziji u
- Page 23 and 24:
Ureteroskopijom i cistoskopijom dob
- Page 25 and 26:
Tuberkuloza urotrakta u pravilu nas
- Page 27 and 28:
značajno niža, a IV urografijom n
- Page 29 and 30:
smrtnost veća. Petogodišnje prež
- Page 31 and 32:
CTU je u tome što omogućuje procj
- Page 33 and 34:
cistoskopiju u svim osim u dvojbeni
- Page 35 and 36:
CT-u su obično izo ili hipodenznij
- Page 37 and 38:
krvarenja. Hipovaskularni su na DSA
- Page 39 and 40:
2.7.4. Policistični bubreziMultipl
- Page 41 and 42:
3cm u promjeru< 1/3 ciste izvan kon
- Page 43 and 44:
funkcionalan odnosno dolazi do tzv
- Page 45 and 46: čine celularni detritus, krv i bak
- Page 47 and 48: 3. HIPOTEZE I CILJEVI ISTRAŽIVANJA
- Page 49 and 50: faktorom za određeni organ prema I
- Page 51 and 52: isključeno iz studije zbog hidrone
- Page 53 and 54: Slika 1. Na VRT rekonstrukciji se p
- Page 55 and 56: Slika 3. Na aksijalnom presjeku i s
- Page 57 and 58: U skupini bolesnika koja je hidrira
- Page 59 and 60: skupini bolesnika koji su hidrirani
- Page 61 and 62: Skupina Nekompletan prikaz Kompleta
- Page 63 and 64: Graf 3Graf 4Grafovi 3 i 4 Broj komp
- Page 65 and 66: Graf 7Graf 8Grafovi 7 i 8. Broj kom
- Page 67 and 68: Graf 11Graf 12Grafovi 11 i 12. Broj
- Page 69 and 70: Da bi se ispitao utjecaj ispunjenos
- Page 71 and 72: Tablica 20. Doze zračenja na pojed
- Page 73 and 74: daje dovoljno vremena za odgovaraju
- Page 75 and 76: što boljeg prikaza urotrakta. Opis
- Page 77 and 78: stupanj ispunjenosti uretera i opac
- Page 79 and 80: otopine u skupini bolesnika kojoj j
- Page 81 and 82: više snimanja u ekskrecijskoj fazi
- Page 83 and 84: 7. ZAKLJUČCIOralna hidracija boles
- Page 85 and 86: skupine bolesnika (p
- Page 87 and 88: patients given oral hydration 20 mi
- Page 89 and 90: 11. Fritz GA, Schoelnast H, Deutsch
- Page 91 and 92: 33. Chow LC, Kwan SW, Olcott EW i s
- Page 93 and 94: 54. Roy C, Saussine C, LeBras Y. As
- Page 95: 78. Barentsz JO, Witjes JA, Ruijs J