rozvojová pomoc a spolupráca - Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov
rozvojová pomoc a spolupráca - Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov rozvojová pomoc a spolupráca - Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov
Basically, there is no one and single correct perception about nationalinterest. For some African states foreign policy was and is realized to securetheir state sovereignty and national identity, which they think is their topsecurity agenda, in the face of threat from their neighbors on the issues ofborder. This perception usually runs to conflict (for example: Ethiopia versusEritrea on the question of Badme; Ethiopia versus Somalia on Ogaden; Togoversus Ghana; Kena versus Somalia; Tanzania versus Uganda; Angola versusformer Zair; Angola versus Congo, etc.)For some, national interest is associated with political differencesbetween heads of states. For example, President Felix Bojgny versus SekouToure both being colonized but the prior is conservative in manner while thelatter is radical. Bojgny relies on the relation with previous colonizer, France asa path to prosperity where as Sekou Toure had totally different visions aboutthe path to state prosperity and degree of cooperation with France.Yoweri Museveni for instance has a different vision about multipartysystem; he is rather reserved in practice referring to its harmfulness toUganda’s national interest, similar to Meles Zenawi of Ethiopoia.Frederick Chiluba of Zambia prohibited Kenneth Kaunda to notparticipate in the run of presidential election on behalf of the country’s nationalinterest.Decision making usually remains personal business of one or fewpersons; it usually does not include complex communication within decisivepolitical élites. This affects the existence of functioning principle of nationalinterest.Ideology is basically, a reaction to reality. Some aspects of ideology thatare connected with foreign policy making and international relations of SSAinclude:1) It was used to interpret internal events - as of the 1960s, for instance, theBiafra situation in Congo envisioned pro radical political struggle ofAfrican nationalism against the domination of colonial powers towardsself-determination.Tanzania, for example, supported the separatists of Biafra and alsorefused to recognize the government of Idi Amin in Uganda against thenorms of the contemporary Organization of African Unity (OAU), whichspoke of respecting boundaries that colonizers delineated, and insisted onnoninterference into other member state’s internal affairs.190
Mozambique and Ethiopia were supporting ZANU with RobertMugabe’s leadership and not ZAPU with Joshua Nkomo’s leadershipduring Zimbabwe’s struggle for independence. Zambia supported ZAPUat that time.2) It was also used as important instrument to identify a friend from anenemy:For example: Kwame Nkrumah a fried to Africa where as FelixBoigny is not; he is a puppet of the colonizers, such as France in the caseof Ivory Coast. It is used to define the animosity between differentmovements in the same or different countries. For instance, in AngolaMPLA versus UNITA; or in Angola and Congo between MPLA andMobutu S. Seko; Yoweri Museveni versus Daniel Arapmoj and the like.3) It was used to limit the political decision making of others - the cause ofthe demise of colonialism is not only the resistance of Africans, but themetropolitans themselves were pretty convinced about its failingperspectives.4) It was used to get correct political decisions - for example, Guinea in1958 chose independence as first former France colony who decided tointegrate with Ghana; or the attempt of creating the foundation for theOAU that had to emerge in the future.On the other hand a foreign policy which is mainly based on nationalinterest advocates about achieving its goals within the state system, throughaccepting the existing environment and by adapting to it. This, national interestbased, approach of shaping foreign policy is different from the ideology basedone. The latter approach insists on evolving completely new environment offoreign policy and international relations, denying that the de jure (currentlyestablished) environment is inefficient to maintain peace, security and mutualsatisfaction. The prior leans towards maintaining the de jure environment. Thelatter thus embraces elements of radical changes as compared to the prior onewhich inclines towards the conservative school.Post colonial development of international politics and internationalrelations of SSA could be explained thus based on these two aforementionedaspects, these are: National interest, and ideology. These aspects show twodifferent approaches, which are, however, intertwined. National interest isrealistic, constructive, adaptive and inductive, where as ideology is idealistic,191
- Page 140 and 141: • 2004 - IFAT začína udeľovať
- Page 142 and 143: veľký záujem je o tento, tak tro
- Page 144 and 145: umožňuje malým farmárom či vý
- Page 146 and 147: 10.6 Doterajšie výsledky a zaují
- Page 148 and 149: všude jinde říkalo otroctví. A
- Page 150 and 151: Tabulka 16Vybrané ukazatele pro Li
- Page 152 and 153: kvalitu výuky), zatímco druhý p
- Page 154 and 155: pomoc přecházela v obnovu a rozvo
- Page 156 and 157: Cílem Sféry je zlepšit kvalitu h
- Page 158 and 159: 12 Slovenská rozvojová pomoc v St
- Page 160 and 161: Významnú úlohu v týchto snahác
- Page 162 and 163: krajiny. Aliancia Pakistanu s Talib
- Page 164 and 165: 12.3.2 KazachstanJe to 9. najväč
- Page 166 and 167: štandardizáciu, metrológiu a cer
- Page 168 and 169: Tabuľka 19Prehľad 12 projektov zr
- Page 170 and 171: v okruhu 100 km od Biškeku. Centru
- Page 172 and 173: Hlavné problémySociálne problém
- Page 174 and 175: • Slovplast, s. r. o., navrhol a
- Page 176 and 177: Hlavné problémyVysychajúce Arals
- Page 178 and 179: 13 Some Problems of International R
- Page 180 and 181: African states, most of which were
- Page 182 and 183: The newly emerged states were insta
- Page 184 and 185: d) racial conflict between white an
- Page 186 and 187: powers like France, who have had re
- Page 188 and 189: important. Their aid for Africa is
- Page 192 and 193: more of fighting, revisionist, visi
- Page 194 and 195: The issue of domestic and foreign p
- Page 196 and 197: 14 Rozvojová pomoc v Latinskej Ame
- Page 198 and 199: integrácii a k politickému dialó
- Page 200 and 201: 14.2 Oficiálna rozvojová pomoc v
- Page 202 and 203: Tabuľka 27Zastúpenie krajín Lati
- Page 204 and 205: Multilaterálna pomoc je v regióne
- Page 206 and 207: 14.3 Európska únia a Latinská Am
- Page 208 and 209: Zoznam použitej literatúryAnnual
- Page 210 and 211: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIT
- Page 212 and 213: FAO: The state of food insecurity i
- Page 214 and 215: KOMISIA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV:
- Page 216 and 217: MZV SR: Národný program oficiáln
- Page 218 and 219: RUSNÁK, U. - SZÉP, A. - BRZICA, D
- Page 220 and 221: UNSD: Millennium Development Goald
- Page 223 and 224: Príloha A: MapyPríloha A.1Prvý,
- Page 225 and 226: Príloha A.5Nominal GDP per person
- Page 227 and 228: Príloha B.3Podiel členských št
- Page 229 and 230: Príloha C:SchémyPríloha C.1Mecha
- Page 232: NázovRozvojová pomoc a spoluprác
Basically, there is no one and single correct perception about nationalinterest. For some African states foreign policy was and is realized to securetheir state sovereignty and national identity, which they think is their topsecurity agenda, in the face of threat from their neighbors on the issues ofborder. This perception usually runs to conflict (for example: Ethiopia versusEritrea on the question of Badme; Ethiopia versus Somalia on Ogaden; Togoversus Ghana; Kena versus Somalia; Tanzania versus Uganda; Angola versusformer Zair; Angola versus Congo, etc.)For some, national interest is associated with political differencesbetween heads of states. For example, President Felix Bojgny versus SekouToure both being colonized but the prior is conservative in manner while thelatter is radical. Bojgny relies on the relation with previous colonizer, France asa path to prosperity where as Sekou Toure had totally different visions aboutthe path to state prosperity and degree of cooperation with France.Yoweri Museveni for instance has a different vision about multipartysystem; he is rather reserved in practice referring to its harmfulness toUganda’s national interest, similar to Meles Zenawi of Ethiopoia.Frederick Chiluba of Zambia prohibited Kenneth Kaunda to notparticipate in the run of presidential election on behalf of the country’s nationalinterest.Decision making usually remains personal business of one or fewpersons; it usually does not include complex communication within decisivepolitical élites. This affects the existence of functioning principle of nationalinterest.Ideology is basically, a reaction to reality. Some aspects of ideology thatare connected with foreign policy making and international relations of SSAinclude:1) It was used to interpret internal events - as of the 1960s, for instance, theBiafra situation in Congo envisioned pro radical political struggle ofAfrican nationalism against the domination of colonial powers towardsself-determination.Tanzania, for example, supported the separatists of Biafra and alsorefused to recognize the government of Idi Amin in Uganda against thenorms of the contemporary Organization of African Unity (OAU), whichspoke of respecting boundaries that colonizers delineated, and insisted onnoninterference into other member state’s internal affairs.190