ÐÐÐÐ - ÐÐ»Ð°Ð²Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÑÑаниÑа - ÐдеÑÑкий ÐаÑÑоналÑний УнÑвеÑÑиÑÐµÑ ...
ÐÐÐÐ - ÐÐ»Ð°Ð²Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÑÑаниÑа - ÐдеÑÑкий ÐаÑÑоналÑний УнÑвеÑÑиÑÐµÑ ...
ÐÐÐÐ - ÐÐ»Ð°Ð²Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÑÑаниÑа - ÐдеÑÑкий ÐаÑÑоналÑний УнÑвеÑÑиÑÐµÑ ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ÌÎÂÀ ¹ 15<br />
6. Ôàâà Ý., Ãîâîðóõî Ð. À. Ñèíòàêñèñ è ñåìàíòèêà ââîäíûõ ñëîâ — ïîêàçàòåëåé èëëîêóòèâíîé ñèëû âûñêàçûâàíèÿ<br />
(ðóññêî-èòàëüÿíñêèå ïàðàëëåëè) // Âåñòíèê Ìîñêîâñêîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà. Ñåð. 9: Ôèëîëîãèÿ. — 2001. — ¹4. — Ñ. 36–<br />
47.<br />
7. Ôîðìàíîâñêàÿ Í. È. Ðóññêèé ðå÷åâîé ýòèêåò: íîðìàòèâíûé ñîöèîêóëüòóðíûé êîíòåêñò. — Ì., 2002.<br />
8. Ôîðìàíîâñêàÿ Í. È. Ðå÷åâîå âçàèìîäåéñòâèå: êîììóíèêàöèÿ è ïðàãìàòèêà. — Ì., 2007.<br />
9. Øìåë¸âà Å. À. Ðàçðåøåíèå è çàïðåùåíèå êàê ïîáóäèòåëüíûå ðå÷åâûå àêòû // Ôóíêöèîíàëüíî-òèïîëîãè÷åñêèå<br />
àñïåêòû àíàëèçà èìïåðàòèâà. — ×.2: Ñåìàíòèêà è ïðàãìàòèêà ïîâåëèòåëüíûõ ïðåäëîæåíèé / Ðåä. Áèðþëèí Ë. À.,<br />
Õðàêîâñêèé Â. Ñ. — Ì., 1990. — Ñ. 66–71.<br />
10. Ardissono L., Boella G., Lesmo L. Indirect Speech Acts and Politeness: A Computational Approach — Pittsburgh, 1995 //<br />
[Ýëåêòðîííûé ðåñóðñ]. — Ðåæèì äîñòóïà: http://www.di.unito.it/~gull/HTML/PRAGMATICS/CS/cs-per-www.html<br />
11. 11 Asher N., Lascarides A. Indirect Speech Acts // Synthese. — 2001. — #128. — P. 183–228.<br />
12. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. — Oxford, 1962.<br />
13. Awdiejew A. Klasyfikacja funkcji pragmatycznych // Polonica. — 1983. — IX — S. 53–88.<br />
14. Bralczyk J. O leksykalnych wyznacznikach prawdziwoœciowej oceny s¹dów. — Katowice, 1976.<br />
15. Bralczyk J. Hipotetyzuj¹ca postawa nadawcy jako sk³adnik treœci zdania // Studia Semiotyczne. — 1977. — VIII. — S. 173–<br />
180.<br />
16. Madej J. Perswazyjne akty mowy w komunikowaniu politycznym // Poradnik Jêzykowy. — 2008. — Z.1. — S.26–40.<br />
17. Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. — Cambridge, 1969.<br />
A. Czapiga<br />
ENDORSEMENT AS A SPEECH ACT<br />
The article deals with the analysis of modal functions of utterances in the speech act of endorsement. It also gives<br />
transformations of the act and tries to define the linguistic tools for the analysis. Some markers of the act in Russian,<br />
Polish and English are presented and analysed. The article gives examples of other speech acts that can coexist with<br />
endorsement in one utterance.<br />
Key words: endorsement, speech acts, modal functions, Russian, Polish, English.<br />
À. ×àï³ãà<br />
ÑÕÂÀËÅÍÍß ßÊ ÌÎÂËÅÍͪÂÈÉ ÀÊÒ<br />
Ñòàòòÿ ïðèñâÿ÷åíà àíàë³çó ìîäàëüíèõ ôóíêö³é âèñëîâëåííÿ, ÿêå ì³ñòèòü åëåìåíò ñõâàëåííÿ, ùî ðîçãëÿäàºòüñÿ<br />
ÿê àêò ìîâëåííÿ. Ïîäàíî åêñïë³êàö³¿, íàâåäåíî ë³íãâ³ñòè÷íèé ³íñòðóìåíòàð³é äëÿ îïèñó òà àíàë³çó<br />
ðåïë³ê ç åëåìåíòàìè ñõâàëåííÿ. Âêàçàíî äåÿê³ ïîêàçíèêè ñõâàëåííÿ ÿê àêòó ìîâëåííÿ â ðîñ³éñüê³é,<br />
ïîëüñüê³é ³ àíãë³éñüê³é ìîâàõ, à òàêîæ ïðèêëàäè ñïîëó÷åííÿ àêòó ñõâàëåííÿ ç ³íøèìè àêòàìè ìîâëåííÿ.<br />
Êëþ÷îâ³ ñëîâà: ñõâàëåííÿ, àêòè ìîâëåííÿ, ìîäàëüí³ ôóíêö³¿, ðîñ³éñüêà ìîâà, ïîëüñüêà ìîâà, àíãë³éñüêà<br />
ìîâà.<br />
54