Ä ² À Ë Î Ã

65
ÓÄÊ 007 : 304 : 070 : 047.1
Îëüãà Áèêîâà
ÆÀÍÐÎÂÎ-ÑÒÈËÜβ ÎÑÎÁËÈÂÎÑÒ² ÐÅÏÎÐÒÀÆÓ-
ÐÎÇÑ˲ÄÓÂÀÍÍß Â ÑÓ×ÀÑÍ²É ÓÊÐÀ¯ÍÑÜÊ²É ÏÐÅѲ
Ó ñòàòò³ ðîçãëÿäàþòüñÿ æàíðîâî-ñòèëüîâ³ îñîáëèâîñò³ ðåïîðòàæóðîçñë³äóâàííÿ.
Íàãîëîøóºòüñÿ íà òîìó, ùî àâòîð çà äîïîìîãîþ êàòåãîð³¿
àâòîðñüêîãî «ÿ» äåìîíñòðóº ñâîþ ïðè÷åòí³ñòü äî ïî䳿, âèñëîâëþº âëàñí³
ñóäæåííÿ ³ îö³íêè. Îñîáëèâà óâàãà ïðèä³ëÿºòüñÿ ïðè÷èíàì íàäòî ïîâ³ëüíîãî
âïðîâàäæåííÿ ðåïîðòàæó-ðîçñë³äóâàííÿ ó ïðàêòèêó óêðà¿íñüêî¿ ïðåñîâî¿
æóðíàë³ñòèêè.
Êëþ÷îâ³ ñëîâà: ðåïîðòàæ-ðîçñë³äóâàííÿ, æàíð, ³íâåñòèãàòèâíà æóðíàë³ñòèêà.
 ñòàòüå ðàññìàòðèâàþòñÿ æàíðîâî-ñòèëåâûå îñîáåííîñòè ðåïîðòàæà-ðàññëåäîâàíèÿ.
Îñíîâíîé àêöåíò äåëàåòñÿ íà òîì, ÷òî àâòîð ñ ïîìîùüþ
êàòåãîðèè àâòîðñêîãî «ÿ» äåìîíñòðèðóåò ñâîþ ïðè÷àñòíîñòü ê ñîáûòèþ,
âûðàæàåò ñîáñòâåííûå ñóæäåíèÿ è îöåíêè. Îñîáåííîå âíèìàíèå óäåëÿåòñÿ
ïðè÷èíàì ñëèøêîì ìåäëåííîãî âíåäðåíèÿ ðåïîðòàæà-ðàññëåäîâàíèÿ â ïðàêòèêó
óêðàèíñêîé ïðåññîâîé æóðíàëèñòèêè.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ðåïîðòàæ-ðàññëåäîâàíèå, æàíð, èíâåñòèãàòèâíàÿ
æóðíàëèñòèêà.
The article deals with the problem of genre stylish features of the reporting-investigation
are examined in the article. A basic accent is done on tom, that author
by means of category of authorial «EGO» demonstrates the involvement to the event,
expresses own judgements and estimations. The special attention in the article is
spared to reasons of too slow introduction of reporting of investigation in practice of
Ukrainian press journalism.
Key words: reporting-investigation, genre, investigation journalism.
Ðåïîðòàæ º îäíèì ³ç íàéïîïóëÿðí³øèõ æàíð³â ãàçåòíî¿ ïóáë³öèñòèêè.
Cåðåä æóðíàë³ñòñüêèõ æàíð³â ðåïîðòàæ ìîæíà ââàæàòè îäíèì ³ç
íàéá³ëüø äîñë³äæåíèõ (äèâ. ïðàö³ Ì. Âàñèëåíêà, Ñ. Ãóðåâè÷à, Â. Çäîðîâåãè,
Ì. ʳì, À. Òåðòè÷íîãî òà ³í.). Ó íàóêîâèõ ðîçâ³äêàõ ðåïîðòàæ
àíàë³çóþòü íàñàìïåðåä ÿê îïåðàòèâíèé ³íôîðìàö³éíèé æàíð. Îñî-
© Îëüãà Áèêîâà, 2010