18.11.2014 Views

GJ - Privredna komora Srbije

GJ - Privredna komora Srbije

GJ - Privredna komora Srbije

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOURLY MEASUREMENTS<br />

DAILY MEASUREMENTS<br />

24 measurements per day<br />

(in ideal conditions)<br />

1 measurement per day<br />

Adjustment by parameter<br />

variation<br />

One triplet (Y, X, H) for individual<br />

day<br />

One triplet (Y, X, H) for individual<br />

day<br />

Accuracy comparison between<br />

hourly and daily observations<br />

Figure 17: Processing of input data<br />

Two different adjustments by parameter variation procedures were performed depending on the input data. In<br />

both cases of the adjustment procedure a priori variance of unit weight was used. The first adjustment by<br />

parameter variation procedure is based solely on the assessment of the a priori variance of the unit weight<br />

whilst the second procedure also takes into account the cofactor matrix of prior measurements.<br />

With the help of adjustment by parameter variation [1]:<br />

• The procedure with which precise values of multiple measurements are determined is derived as well<br />

as the most definite values based on mutual mathematical correlation,<br />

• The evaluation of accuracy and reliability of measured and adjusted data is made.<br />

The procedure of adjustment by parameter variation is based on the on the method of least squares. The<br />

method of least squares means minimizing the sum of squared residuals of measured quantities defined by:<br />

vv min<br />

pvv<br />

ali min<br />

(1)<br />

or in matrix terms<br />

T T T<br />

v v min ali v Pv v Q v min<br />

(2)<br />

-1<br />

ll<br />

In order to assure better transparency and understanding of the two adjustments procedures were labelled<br />

<br />

SAS 2<br />

for the first method and <br />

SAS 3<br />

for the second method. Observations had different accuracies so the<br />

weighted arithmetic mean was applied in both cases.<br />

Adjustment of hourly measurements<br />

The procedures used for the adjustment of hourly observations differed upon the input data. In the first<br />

variance procedure ( <br />

SAS 2<br />

) the a priory variance of unit weight was used as an input data whilst the second<br />

310

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!