ÐзвеÑÑÐ¸Ñ - Ñом VI - Ðинно-геоложки ÑнивеÑÑиÑÐµÑ "Св. Ðван РилÑки"
ÐзвеÑÑÐ¸Ñ - Ñом VI - Ðинно-геоложки ÑнивеÑÑиÑÐµÑ "Св. Ðван РилÑки"
ÐзвеÑÑÐ¸Ñ - Ñом VI - Ðинно-геоложки ÑнивеÑÑиÑÐµÑ "Св. Ðван РилÑки"
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ЛИТЕРАТУРА:<br />
Аристотел, Политика, Отворено общество, София, 1995.<br />
Вебер, М. Социология на господството, Социология на религията, Унив. изд. “Св. К.<br />
Охридски”, София, 1992.<br />
Гълбрайт, Дж. К. Анатомия на властта, Христо Ботев, София, 1993.<br />
Олброу, М. Глобалната епоха, Обсидиан, София, 2001.<br />
Оомен, К. Движения и институции: Структурно противопоставяне и процесуално<br />
свързване? - В: сп. “Социологически проблеми”, бр. 6, 1990.<br />
Вацов, Д. Глобализацията – метафизичен конструкт? - В: сп. Критика и хуманизъм, кн.<br />
14, бр. 2, 2002.<br />
GLOBALIZATION OR GLOBAL AGE. MARTIN ALBROW’S ATTEMPT<br />
FOR HISTORY OF THE PRESENT<br />
Olga Simova<br />
(summary)<br />
The article analyzes critically M. Albrow’s attempt to make social and political theory by<br />
using historical methods and the theory of the ages. It shows the advantages and the<br />
limits of this approach in the investigation of the problems of globalization, and<br />
questions the construct “global age” and the characteristics, which the author attributes<br />
to it. The article examines Albrow’s reasons to accept social as the opposite of political,<br />
and traces out the consequences of the understanding on the matter of social<br />
relations, which this point of view presents too one-sided. This position gives me the<br />
reason to put under critical analysis the understanding of the author about the world<br />
society, inequalities and stratifications in it.<br />
91