01.10.2013 Views

POVZETEK Diplomsko delo se ukvarja s preu?evanjem delovne ...

POVZETEK Diplomsko delo se ukvarja s preu?evanjem delovne ...

POVZETEK Diplomsko delo se ukvarja s preu?evanjem delovne ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>POVZETEK</strong><br />

<strong>Diplomsko</strong> <strong>delo</strong> <strong>se</strong> <strong>ukvarja</strong> s <strong>preu</strong>č<strong>evanjem</strong> <strong>delo</strong>vne samoučinkovitosti ter s<br />

primerjavo faktorskega (tj. faktorsko-analitičnega) in facetnega (tj.facetnoteoretskega)<br />

pristopa k raziskovanju. Preučevanje <strong>delo</strong>vne samoučinkovitosti temelji<br />

na predpostavki, da je ravno prepričanje v lastno učinkovitost pomembna<br />

determinanta vedenja. <strong>Diplomsko</strong> <strong>delo</strong> je razdeljeno na tri dele: teoretični,<br />

metodološki in praktični del.<br />

V teoretičnem delu je podan pregled splošne teorije o samoučinkovitosti ter pregled<br />

empiričnih raziskav s tega področja. Prikazana je tudi uporaba koncepta<br />

samoučinkovitosti znotraj organizacijske psihologije. Ob koncu je predstavljen<br />

teoretični model <strong>delo</strong>vne samoučinkovitosti, ki <strong>delo</strong>vno samoučinkovitost opredeljuje<br />

kot prepričanje posameznika, da je zmožen organizirati in opraviti vsa dejanja,<br />

potrebna za uspešno spoprijemanje z zahtevami specifičnih <strong>delo</strong>vnih nalog ali<br />

poslovnih vedenj.<br />

Metodološki del diplome <strong>se</strong> <strong>ukvarja</strong> s preverjanjem teoretičnega modela <strong>delo</strong>vne<br />

samoučinkovitosti, s <strong>preu</strong>č<strong>evanjem</strong> napovedne veljavnosti <strong>delo</strong>vne samoučinkovitosti<br />

ter s primerjavo faktorskega in facetnega pristopa k preverjanju teorije in konstrukciji<br />

vprašalnikov. V ta namen so bili <strong>se</strong>stavljeni trije različni vprašalniki <strong>delo</strong>vne<br />

samoučinkovitosti, preizkušani na študentih (N=433). Empirična analiza potrjuje tri<br />

temeljne determinante <strong>delo</strong>vne samoučinkovitosti: (1) referenčni kontekst (ali<br />

posameznik dela samostojno ali v skupini), (2) vrsta naloge (ali <strong>se</strong> posameznik pri<br />

delu <strong>ukvarja</strong> s podatki, ljudmi ali s stvarmi) in (3) lastnosti <strong>delo</strong>vne situacije (ali je<br />

posameznik pri svojem delu soočen z oteževalnimi <strong>delo</strong>vnimi okoliščinami – <strong>delo</strong>vna<br />

preobremenjenost, odsotnost strukture, odsotnost znanja – ali pa te okoliščine niso<br />

prisotne). Analiza napovedne veljavnosti odkriva, da <strong>se</strong> predv<strong>se</strong>m samoučinkovitost<br />

za <strong>delo</strong> s podatki pomembno povezuje z maturitetnim in študijskim uspehom.<br />

Primerjava faktorskega in facetnega pristopa pa kaže, da imata oba pristopa svoje<br />

prednosti in slabosti. Podobna sta si v namenu in cilju, razlikujeta pa <strong>se</strong> v poudarku<br />

teoretičnih osnov, v konstrukciji postavk, v predpostavkah za analizo ter v<br />

interpretaciji in prikazovanju rezultatov. Rezultati obeh pristopov so do določene<br />

mere podobni.<br />

Praktični del diplome <strong>se</strong> <strong>ukvarja</strong> s <strong>se</strong>stavo specifičnega vprašalnika <strong>delo</strong>vne<br />

samoučinkovitosti, tj. vprašalnika samoučinkovitosti za menedžerska vedenja (im.<br />

Vprašalnik o menedžerskih vedenjih), preizkušanega na vzorcu zaposlenih<br />

posameznikov v šestih slovenskih podjetjih (N=76). S <strong>se</strong>stavo tega vprašalnika je<br />

prikazana možna uporabna vrednost splošnega modela <strong>delo</strong>vne samoučinkovitosti,<br />

ki smo ga oblikovali v teoretičnem in potrdili v metodološkem delu diplome.<br />

Sestavljen vprašalnik kaže dobre merske lastnosti in <strong>se</strong> zdi uporaben v podjetjih.<br />

Pomembno ob tem je odkritje, da <strong>se</strong> samoučinkovitost za menedžerska vedenja<br />

pomembno povezuje z zadovoljstvom z <strong>delo</strong>m, izgorelostjo pri delu kot tudi z<br />

ab<strong>se</strong>ntizmom.


ABSTRACT<br />

The main topic of this diploma thesis is an investigation of the concept of work <strong>se</strong>lfefficacy<br />

and comparison of factor (factor-analytical) and facet (facet-theoretical)<br />

re<strong>se</strong>arch approaches. The investigation of work <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy is ba<strong>se</strong>d on the<br />

assumption that belief in one's own efficacy is an important determinant of behavior.<br />

The paper is divided into three parts: theoretical, methodological and practical.<br />

In the theoretical part, an overview of general theory of <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy and related<br />

empirical studies is given. The usage of the concept of <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy within<br />

organizational psychology is demonstrated. Finally, a theoretical model of work <strong>se</strong>lfefficacy<br />

is pre<strong>se</strong>nted, which defines work <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy as belief in one’s capability of<br />

organizing and executing behavior, which is necessary for successful coping with<br />

demands of specific working tasks or business behaviors.<br />

The methodological part is focu<strong>se</strong>d on the examination of a theoretical model of<br />

work <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy. It deals with the investigation of the construct and predictive<br />

validity of the work <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy model and also with the comparison of factor and<br />

facet approaches to theory testing and questionnaire construction. For this purpo<strong>se</strong>,<br />

three different questionnaires of work <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy were constructed and tested on<br />

university students (N=433). Empirical analysis confirms three basic determinants of<br />

work <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy: (1) reference context (whether the individual works alone or in a<br />

group), (2) task type (whether the individual's work is in relation to data, to people or<br />

to things) and (3) properties of working situation (whether or not the individual is<br />

expo<strong>se</strong>d to difficult working conditions such as work overload, ab<strong>se</strong>nce of structure<br />

or ab<strong>se</strong>nce of knowledge). Analysis of predictive validity reveals that especially <strong>se</strong>lfefficacy<br />

for working with data is significantly correlated with high school and<br />

undergraduate success. Comparison between factor and facet approaches on the<br />

other hand reveals benefits and shortcomings of both approaches. They are similar<br />

in their purpo<strong>se</strong> and goal, but differ in their focus on theoretical foundations, in items<br />

construction, in analysis assumptions, and in their interpretation and pre<strong>se</strong>ntation of<br />

results. Results of both approaches are to some extent similar.<br />

Finally, the practical part deals with construction of a specific questionnaire of work<br />

<strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy, that is: the questionnaire of <strong>se</strong>lf-efficacy for managerial behaviors<br />

(named Managerial Behavior Questionnaire). It was tested on a sample of<br />

employees from six Slovenian companies (N=76). The construction of the<br />

questionnaire demonstrates the applicative value of the general model of work <strong>se</strong>lfefficacy,<br />

which was constructed in theoretical part and confirmed in the<br />

methodological part of the thesis. The constructed questionnaire displays good<br />

psychometric properties and <strong>se</strong>ems applicative in companies. Importantly, <strong>se</strong>lfefficacy<br />

for managerial behavior is found to be significantly correlated with work<br />

satisfaction, burnout and ab<strong>se</strong>nteeism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!