性別議題在政府人力資源管理之理論與實務 - 臺灣大學圖書館＊公開取 ...

性別議題在政府人力資源管理之理論與實務
Society for Human Resource Management(SHRM) 1998, Workplace Romance Survey.
Alexandria VA:SHRM Public Affairs Department.
Stewart, J. 1978, “Understanding women in organizations: Toward a reconstruction of
organizational theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2): 336-350.
Stroh, Linda K. ; Brett, Jeanne M. & Reilly, Anne H.1992, “All the Right stuff: A
comparison of female and male managers’ career progression.” Journal of Applied
Psychology,77(3): 251-260.
Stroh, Linda K. ; Brett, Jeanne M. & Reilly, Anne H. 1996, “ Family structure, glass ceiling,
and traditional explanations for the differential rate of turnover of female and
managers.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49: 99-118.
SWC 2001, Canadian Experience in Gender Mainstreaming .” SWC.
Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D.1992, “ Outcomes of federal court decisions on sexual
harassment.” Academy of Management Journal, 35, 181-190.
True J. & M. Mintrom 2001, “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of
Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), pp. 27-57.
U.S. Department of Labor 1997, The Glass Ceiling Initiative: Are There Cracks in the
Ceiling? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards
Administration Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.
U.S. Glass Ceiling Commission 1995, Good for Business: Making Full Use of the Nation’s
Human Capital. Washington, D.C.: Recommendation of Federal Glass Ceiling
Commission.
U.S. Merit System Protection Board 1991, Balancing Work Responsibilities and Family
Needs: The Federal Civil Service Response. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Merit System
Protection Board.
U.S. Merit System Protection Board 1992, A Question of Equity: Women and the Glass
Ceiling. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Merit System Protection Board.
Wallace, M. 2000, “Workplace training initiatives: implications for women in the Australian
workforce.” Journal of European Industrial Training. 24(5): 268-.
Whaley, G. L. & Tucker, S.H.1998, “A theoretical integration of sexual harassment model.”
Equal Opportunities International, 17(1): 21-29.
196