Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie - Department of ...

Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie - Department of ... Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie - Department of ...

04.05.2013 Views

2. Experimental Instrumentation Flow-through chronopotentiometric measurements were carried out by an electrochemical analyser EcaFlow model GLP 150 (Istran Ltd., Slovakia) equipped with two solenoid inert valves, a peristaltic pump, 1 mm inner diameter PTFE tubing and a microprocessor controlled potentiostat/galvanostat. The block diagram of the system was reported elsewhere [17]. The signals were recorded and evaluated by the memory-mapping technique [18, 19]. The measurement consists of two main steps: (i) the background signal is measured first by means of a blank sample, (ii) followed by the sample or standard solution giving the signal of the sample or standard. The sample or standard is preconcentrated and the cell is rinsed with the carrier electrolyte into which the deposit is stripped. The cell is then rinsed again to remove the stripped hydrazine ions enabling the next run. The background signal is then subtracted from the signal of the standard or sample yielding the corresponding background corrected net signal. A compact flow-through electrochemical cell of type 353 with Pt auxiliary and Ag/AgCl reference electrodes was used (Istran Ltd., Slovakia). The working electrode was a reticulated vitreous carbon plug of 100 ppi (pores per inch) porosity (Electrosynthesis Co. Inc., Lancaster, New York, USA) of 10 mm and 4 mm in diameter and length, respectively. We are used two type of the electrodes: microporous electrode E-53C which is characterized by a large active surface (up to 25 cm 2 ) and low internal volume (only 20 l) and macroporous electrode E-104C which is also characterized by active surface (10 cm 2 ) and large volume (300 l). The operation parameters are listed in Table 1 for microporous electrode and in Table 2 for macroporous electrode, respectively. All potentials are expressed versus the silver/silver chloride reference electrode built in the cell. Table 1. Operation parameters of the flow-through electrochemical analyser for microporous electrode Parameter Dimension Value Deposition potential mV 200 Quiescence potential I mV 200 Quiescence time I s 5 Quiescence potential II mV -200 Quiescence time II s 5 Terminal potential mV 1000 Regeneration potential mV 0 Standby potential mV 0 Stripping current A 200 Sample volume mL 4 Blank volume mL 4 Rinsing volume mL 4 Flow rate mL/min 6 Table 2. Operation parameters of the flow-through electrochemical analyser for macroporous electrode Parameter Dimension Value Deposition potential mV 200 Quiescence potential I mV 200 Quiescence time I s 5 Quiescence potential II mV -200 Quiescence time II s 5 Terminal potential mV 800 Regeneration potential mV 0 Standby potential mV 0 Stripping current A 10 Sample volume mL 4 Blank volume mL 4 Rinsing volume mL 4 Flow rate mL/min 6 Zborník príspevkov z 18. medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie "Analytické metódy a zdravie loveka", ISBN 978-80-969435-7-9 - 85 - hotel Falkensteiner, Bratislava 11. - 14. 10. 2010

Reagents Analytical-reagent grade chemicals were used in all experiments. Deionised and degassed water was used for the preparation of all solutions. Carrier electrolyte and electrolyte for sample preparation: 0.1 mol L 1 Na 2HPO 4. The bulk standard solution hydrazine was 1 g L 1 . The calibration solutions were prepared fresh before the measurement by diluting the bulk standard solution in 0.1 mol L 1 Na 2HPO 4. The concentration of the standards was in the range of 1 – 700 g L 1 for macroporous electrode and 0.7 – 50 mg.L -1 for microporous electrode, respectively. Sampling and sample preparation The samples were taken into amber glass bottles and stored in a refrigerator. The control measurements were performed at the same time as the chronopotentiometric measurements. Prior to analysis, the sample in the bottle was shaken and then let to sediment for few minutes. For analysis the supernatant was pipetted. The signal for macroporous electrode E-104C at low concentrations of hydrazine decreases because hydrazine is not stable and oxidizes the oxygen present. Therefore, the stabilization of a boiler water samples with hydrochloric acid for macroporous electrode E-104C is necessary. After stabilization, the signal is higher and more stable for up to several days. Sample analysis The sample was added to Na 2HPO 4.and on mixing the solution was immediately analysed. The boiler water samples were analysed with the elaborated method independently in two laboratories by two different operators. The accuracy of the results for boiler water samples was checked independently in an accredited laboratory by the titration method according to the Slovak Standard STN. 3. Results and discussion Optimisation The solubility of hydrazine facilitates the electrochemical determination of hydrazine through stripping analysis by making use of an electrode material forming such a hydrazine. A porous glassy carbon electrodes offer the best performance. Covering the surface with Triton X-100 (helps no to detain bubbles in the pores of electrodes) improved significantly its performance. The same electrode could be used for several days virtually without loss of the sensitivity. On deposition the cell is flushed with the electrolyte and the deposit is stripped, the latter is washed from the electrode during the rinsing step. Porous electrodes possess a unique feature, absent in non-porous structures, namely there is a possibility to strip and deposit the analyte many times in a stopped flow regime. This can be used for signal accumulation in order to increase the signal to noise ratio [20], or to shift the signal to a potential range with lower background level. The first step was to optimize the parameter for the current dependence 3 mg L -1 hydrazine on microporous electrode E-53C. Changing the current between 20 A to 1000 A, while we observed in this measurement, in addition to current and stripping time, peak symmetry and yield. We decided to stripping current 200 A for optimal stripping time, peak symmetry and yield. Owing to the large electrode surface, stripping current larger than 200 A should be used. The measurement time at lower currents is longer than 5 min. The current of 200 A ensured the best signal to noise ratio and fast measurement. For a sample volume of 4 mL taken for preconcentration on the microporous electrode E53C, the response is linear up to about 0.7–50 mg L 1 (regression data: slope 0.0980, intercept -0.0321, correlation coefficient 0.99938) with a limit of detection and quantification [21] of 0.2 mg L 1 and 0.7 mg L 1 , respectively. The boiler water of power, such a concentration of hydrazine normally occur only in rare cases such as start-or operation is also the possibility of using industrial waste water discharged into surface waters of the energy industry (heat and power plants), where regulation of the Government .296/2005 Coll is permissible maximum value of 4.0 mg L -1 hydrazine. For a sample volume of 4 mL taken for preconcentration on the macroporous electrode E104C., the response is linear up to about 1–700 g L 1 (regression data: slope 0.00133, intercept -0.02735, correlation coefficient 0.9989) with a limit of detection and quantification [21] of 7.8 g L 1 and 23.4 g L 1 , respectively. The boiler water from plants such concentrations of hydrazine already happening, what is important for the proposed method and substantially. Their normal value is between 20 g L -1 to 100 g L -1 of hydrazine. Testing of interferences of compounds typical for boiler water from power stations showed that determination was mainly influenced cuprous Cu(II), ferrous Fe(II) and ferric Fe(III) cations because of precipitates creation with hydrogenphosphate and ammonia, which increased the background. It was found that the ratio of N2H4 : interferent equal 1:10 significantly affects the signal of hydrazine in all these interferent except ammonia, which affects the signal of hydrazine at a ratio of 1:1000. Zborník príspevkov z 18. medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie "Analytické metódy a zdravie loveka", ISBN 978-80-969435-7-9 - 86 - hotel Falkensteiner, Bratislava 11. - 14. 10. 2010

Reagents<br />

Analytical-reagent grade chemicals were used in all experiments.<br />

Deionised and degassed water was used for the preparation <strong>of</strong> all solutions.<br />

Carrier electrolyte and electrolyte for sample preparation: 0.1 mol L 1 Na 2HPO 4.<br />

The bulk standard solution hydrazine was 1 g L 1 . The calibration solutions were prepared fresh before the measurement by<br />

diluting the bulk standard solution in 0.1 mol L 1 Na 2HPO 4. The concentration <strong>of</strong> the standards was in the range <strong>of</strong> 1 –<br />

700 g L 1 for macroporous electrode and 0.7 – 50 mg.L -1 for microporous electrode, respectively.<br />

Sampling and sample preparation<br />

The samples were taken into amber glass bottles and stored in a refrigerator. The control measurements were performed at<br />

the same time as the chronopotentiometric measurements. Prior to analysis, the sample in the bottle was shaken and then let<br />

to sediment for few minutes. For analysis the supernatant was pipetted. The signal for macroporous electrode E-104C at low<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> hydrazine decreases because hydrazine is not stable and oxidizes the oxygen present. Therefore, the<br />

stabilization <strong>of</strong> a boiler water samples with hydrochloric acid for macroporous electrode E-104C is necessary. After<br />

stabilization, the signal is higher and more stable for up to several days.<br />

Sample analysis<br />

The sample was added to Na 2HPO 4.and on mixing the solution was immediately analysed.<br />

The boiler water samples were analysed with the elaborated method independently in two laboratories by two different<br />

operators.<br />

The accuracy <strong>of</strong> the results for boiler water samples was checked independently in an accredited laboratory by the titration<br />

method according to the Slovak Standard STN.<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

Optimisation<br />

The solubility <strong>of</strong> hydrazine facilitates the electrochemical determination <strong>of</strong> hydrazine through stripping analysis by making<br />

use <strong>of</strong> an electrode material forming such a hydrazine. A porous glassy carbon electrodes <strong>of</strong>fer the best performance.<br />

Covering the surface with Triton X-100 (helps no to detain bubbles in the pores <strong>of</strong> electrodes) improved significantly its<br />

performance. The same electrode could be used for several days virtually without loss <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity.<br />

On deposition the cell is flushed with the electrolyte and the deposit is stripped, the latter is washed from the electrode during<br />

the rinsing step. Porous electrodes possess a unique feature, absent in non-porous structures, namely there is a possibility to<br />

strip and deposit the analyte many times in a stopped flow regime. This can be used for signal accumulation in order to<br />

increase the signal to noise ratio [20], or to shift the signal to a potential range with lower background level.<br />

The first step was to optimize the parameter for the current dependence 3 mg L -1 hydrazine on microporous electrode E-53C.<br />

Changing the current between 20 A to 1000 A, while we observed in this measurement, in addition to current and stripping<br />

time, peak symmetry and yield. We decided to stripping current 200 A for optimal stripping time, peak symmetry and yield.<br />

Owing to the large electrode surface, stripping current larger than 200 A should be used. The measurement time at lower<br />

currents is longer than 5 min. The current <strong>of</strong> 200 A ensured the best signal to noise ratio and fast measurement.<br />

For a sample volume <strong>of</strong> 4 mL taken for preconcentration on the microporous electrode E53C, the response is linear up to<br />

about 0.7–50 mg L 1 (regression data: slope 0.0980, intercept -0.0321, correlation coefficient 0.99938) with a limit <strong>of</strong><br />

detection and quantification [21] <strong>of</strong> 0.2 mg L 1 and 0.7 mg L 1 , respectively.<br />

The boiler water <strong>of</strong> power, such a concentration <strong>of</strong> hydrazine normally occur only in rare cases such as start-or operation is<br />

also the possibility <strong>of</strong> using industrial waste water discharged into surface waters <strong>of</strong> the energy industry (heat and power<br />

plants), where regulation <strong>of</strong> the Government .296/2005 Coll is permissible maximum value <strong>of</strong> 4.0 mg L -1 hydrazine.<br />

For a sample volume <strong>of</strong> 4 mL taken for preconcentration on the macroporous electrode E104C., the response is linear up to<br />

about 1–700 g L 1 (regression data: slope 0.00133, intercept -0.02735, correlation coefficient 0.9989) with a limit <strong>of</strong><br />

detection and quantification [21] <strong>of</strong> 7.8 g L 1 and 23.4 g L 1 , respectively.<br />

The boiler water from plants such concentrations <strong>of</strong> hydrazine already happening, what is important for the proposed method<br />

and substantially. Their normal value is between 20 g L -1 to 100 g L -1 <strong>of</strong> hydrazine.<br />

Testing <strong>of</strong> interferences <strong>of</strong> compounds typical for boiler water from power stations showed that determination was mainly<br />

influenced cuprous Cu(II), ferrous Fe(II) and ferric Fe(III) cations because <strong>of</strong> precipitates creation with hydrogenphosphate<br />

and ammonia, which increased the background. It was found that the ratio <strong>of</strong> N2H4 : interferent equal 1:10 significantly<br />

affects the signal <strong>of</strong> hydrazine in all these interferent except ammonia, which affects the signal <strong>of</strong> hydrazine at a ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

1:1000.<br />

<strong>Zborník</strong> <strong>príspevkov</strong><br />

z 18. medzinárodnej <strong>vedeckej</strong> <strong>konferencie</strong><br />

"Analytické metódy a zdravie loveka", ISBN 978-80-969435-7-9<br />

- 86 -<br />

hotel Falkensteiner, Bratislava<br />

11. - 14. 10. 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!