Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie - Department of ...

Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie - Department of ... Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie - Department of ...

04.05.2013 Views

applied to attain a stabilization of the most phosphorus matrix without any loss of the analyte. In the presence of 10 g of Pd plus 10 g of La up to 25g of phosphorus (in the form of NaNH4HPO 4) can be tolerated without changes of sensitivity. It can be seen from Fig. 3, that using Pd + La(NO 3) 3 modifier, an increase of absorbance at the 213.6 nm line (phosphorus atomic absorption) for temperatures above 600 °C is less pronounced, in comparison with conditions when only La(NO 3)3 was used as a modifier. The optimal amounts of analyte and matrix modifiers were determined by interpretation of dependency of normalized integrated absorbance of analyte versus modifier weight. Peak shapes were also taken into consideration for optimization of the modifier mass. From figures it is evident, that lanthanum effectively stabilizes phosphorus species in solid samples from 10 g amount and palladium stabilizes Pb completely fom 10 g per atomization. For practical purposes the addition of ammonium nitrate (200 g per atomization) to mixed modifier increased the robustness against possible chloride interference and also improves the mineralization of the solid matrix during pyrolysis stage. The amount of additional matrix modifier, ammonium nitrate, was not optimized. It can be noticed that the palladiumammonium nitrate-lanthanum mixed modifier provided about 5% higher sensitivity compared with palladium-lanthanum modifier. Fig. 2a.: Optimization of the amount of matrix modifier (constant amount 10 g of palladium modifier and 200 g of NH4NO3 were added, temperature program according to Table 1, each point of the graph represents the median of 3 independent measurements) 3.2. Analytical results of the method developed Fig. 2b.: Optimization of the amount of analyte modifier (Pd) (constant amount 10 g of La and 200 g of NH 4NO3 were added, temperature program according to Table 1, each point of the graph represents the median of 3 independent measurements) Although calibration in SS-ETAAS has been considered a problematic part, several studies have shown that calibrations with aqueous standards were satisfactory. Despite the fact, that application of the standard addition technique in SS-ETAAS is more time-consuming than by the conventional ETAAS, it was applied in this study in order to compare the results obtained with this technique and the technique of external calibration, using aqueous calibration solutions. To investigate the feasibility of aqueous calibration curves for quantification, the atomization profiles of solid samples were compared with the peak profiles of the aqueous standards. As it can be seen in Fig. 3a in the presence of food matrix (BCR 189 wholemeal flour), for both, Pd+ NH 4NO3 and Pd+ NH4NO3+La addition, Pb atomic absorption signal appears before, i.e. at the lower temperature when compared with matrix-free conditions. This fact can be attributed to the less efficient analyte stabilization due to the presence of high amount of the interfering matrix. By using Pd+ NH4NO3+La ternary modifier this effect is more pronounced. Also from Fig. 3a is evident, that some overcorrection is appeared in Pb atomic signal after half-time of atomization. This side effect is related to incomplete phosphorus bonding due to lower efficiency of the La(NO 3) 3 modifier in solid samples, compared to aqueous solutions. To avoid erratic result caused by mentioned phenomenon the integration time was reduced to 3s if solid samples were atomized. On the Fig. 3b it is clearly showed, that described mixed modifier has serious limitation, when extremely high amounts (10 mg or more) of solid samples were analyzed. The detection limit was calculated following the IUPAC recommendations as the concentration of lead which corresponds to 3 times the standard deviation of blank. The detection limit obtained was 0.15 pg of Pb using described Zborník príspevkov z 18. medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie "Analytické metódy a zdravie loveka", ISBN 978-80-969435-7-9 - 73 - hotel Falkensteiner, Bratislava 11. - 14. 10. 2010

modifier mixture. With a maximum sample intake of 1.56 mg the limit of detection in studied food matrices was 0.024 g .g 1 . The quantification limit, calculated as the concentration corresponding to 10 times the standard deviation of the blank, was 0.51 pg of Pb, considering the maximum applicable sample mass the limit of quantification was 0.079 g.g 1 . The characteristic mass was varied around 10.3±0.9 pg, which is approximately a factor of two times higher than the value reported for Pb using HRCS-ETAAS at the line at 217.000 nm [15]. The analytical results obtained for six food reference materials employing aqueous calibration curve quantification and standard addition method are summarized in Table 2. The results are presented as average ± standard deviation. Results obtained by calibration curve and results obtained by standard addition technique are compared with certified values, and for five food reference materials do not show statistical difference (t-test). Fig. 3a.: Dependence of absorbance of lead in aqueous standard and solid sample (1-0.5ng Pb in aqueous standard + Pd/NH 4NO 3/La, 2-1mg BCR No. 189 + Pd/NH 4NO 3/La, 3-1mg BCR No. 189 + Pd/NH4NO 3) on the atomization time 4. Conclusions Sample Fig. 3b.: Dependence of absorbance of lead in aqueous standard and solid sample (1-0.5ng Pb in aqueous standard+Pd/NH 4NO 3/La, 2-10mg A-11+ Pd/NH4NO 3/La, 3-10mg A-11 + Pd/NH 4NO 3) on the atomization time Table 2. Temperature program for determination of lead in food-stuffs by SS-ETAAS Certified content (g.g -1 ) Aqueous calibration curve (g.g -1 ) Standard addition technique (g.g -1 ) BOWEN’s kale 2.49±0.55 2.62±0.49 2.55±0.37 GBW 08504 0.28±0.09 0.30±0.02 0.31±0.05 GBW 07605 4.4 a 4.29±0.21 4.31±0.28 BCR No.189 0.379±0.003 0.384±0.026 0.380±0.043 BCR No.150 1.00±0.09 1.04±0.15 1.03±0.18 A-11 0.054±0.025 0.022±0,010 b n.d. a b indicative value; result is lower than certified value due to pronounced interference; n.d. not determined In present work our intention was to test the potential feasibility of lanthanum nitrate as matrix modifier to eliminate phosphorus interferences on the determination of Pb at primary analytical line. It has been demonstrated that the determination of lead in a phosphorus rich matrix can be carried out using direct solid sampling ETAAS and calibration Zborník príspevkov z 18. medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie "Analytické metódy a zdravie loveka", ISBN 978-80-969435-7-9 - 74 - hotel Falkensteiner, Bratislava 11. - 14. 10. 2010

applied to attain a stabilization <strong>of</strong> the most phosphorus matrix without any loss <strong>of</strong> the analyte. In the presence <strong>of</strong> 10 g <strong>of</strong> Pd<br />

plus 10 g <strong>of</strong> La up to 25g <strong>of</strong> phosphorus (in the form <strong>of</strong> NaNH4HPO 4) can be tolerated without changes <strong>of</strong> sensitivity. It<br />

can be seen from Fig. 3, that using Pd + La(NO 3) 3 modifier, an increase <strong>of</strong> absorbance at the 213.6 nm line (phosphorus<br />

atomic absorption) for temperatures above 600 °C is less pronounced, in comparison with conditions when only La(NO 3)3<br />

was used as a modifier.<br />

The optimal amounts <strong>of</strong> analyte and matrix modifiers were determined by interpretation <strong>of</strong> dependency <strong>of</strong> normalized<br />

integrated absorbance <strong>of</strong> analyte versus modifier weight. Peak shapes were also taken into consideration for optimization <strong>of</strong><br />

the modifier mass. From figures it is evident, that lanthanum effectively stabilizes phosphorus species in solid samples from<br />

10 g amount and palladium stabilizes Pb completely fom 10 g per atomization.<br />

For practical purposes the addition <strong>of</strong> ammonium nitrate (200 g per atomization) to mixed modifier increased the<br />

robustness against possible chloride interference and also improves the mineralization <strong>of</strong> the solid matrix during pyrolysis<br />

stage. The amount <strong>of</strong> additional matrix modifier, ammonium nitrate, was not optimized. It can be noticed that the palladiumammonium<br />

nitrate-lanthanum mixed modifier provided about 5% higher sensitivity compared with palladium-lanthanum<br />

modifier.<br />

Fig. 2a.: Optimization <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> matrix modifier<br />

(constant amount 10 g <strong>of</strong> palladium modifier and 200<br />

g <strong>of</strong> NH4NO3 were added, temperature program<br />

according to Table 1, each point <strong>of</strong> the graph represents<br />

the median <strong>of</strong> 3 independent measurements)<br />

3.2. Analytical results <strong>of</strong> the method developed<br />

Fig. 2b.: Optimization <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> analyte modifier<br />

(Pd) (constant amount 10 g <strong>of</strong> La and 200 g <strong>of</strong><br />

NH 4NO3 were added, temperature program according to<br />

Table 1, each point <strong>of</strong> the graph represents the median <strong>of</strong><br />

3 independent measurements)<br />

Although calibration in SS-ETAAS has been considered a problematic part, several studies have shown that<br />

calibrations with aqueous standards were satisfactory. Despite the fact, that application <strong>of</strong> the standard addition technique in<br />

SS-ETAAS is more time-consuming than by the conventional ETAAS, it was applied in this study in order to compare the<br />

results obtained with this technique and the technique <strong>of</strong> external calibration, using aqueous calibration solutions. To<br />

investigate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> aqueous calibration curves for quantification, the atomization pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> solid samples were<br />

compared with the peak pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the aqueous standards. As it can be seen in Fig. 3a in the presence <strong>of</strong> food matrix (BCR<br />

189 wholemeal flour), for both, Pd+ NH 4NO3 and Pd+ NH4NO3+La addition, Pb atomic absorption signal appears before,<br />

i.e. at the lower temperature when compared with matrix-free conditions. This fact can be attributed to the less efficient<br />

analyte stabilization due to the presence <strong>of</strong> high amount <strong>of</strong> the interfering matrix. By using Pd+ NH4NO3+La ternary modifier<br />

this effect is more pronounced. Also from Fig. 3a is evident, that some overcorrection is appeared in Pb atomic signal after<br />

half-time <strong>of</strong> atomization. This side effect is related to incomplete phosphorus bonding due to lower efficiency <strong>of</strong> the<br />

La(NO 3) 3 modifier in solid samples, compared to aqueous solutions. To avoid erratic result caused by mentioned<br />

phenomenon the integration time was reduced to 3s if solid samples were atomized. On the Fig. 3b it is clearly showed, that<br />

described mixed modifier has serious limitation, when extremely high amounts (10 mg or more) <strong>of</strong> solid samples were<br />

analyzed.<br />

The detection limit was calculated following the IUPAC recommendations as the concentration <strong>of</strong> lead which<br />

corresponds to 3 times the standard deviation <strong>of</strong> blank. The detection limit obtained was 0.15 pg <strong>of</strong> Pb using described<br />

<strong>Zborník</strong> <strong>príspevkov</strong><br />

z 18. medzinárodnej <strong>vedeckej</strong> <strong>konferencie</strong><br />

"Analytické metódy a zdravie loveka", ISBN 978-80-969435-7-9<br />

- 73 -<br />

hotel Falkensteiner, Bratislava<br />

11. - 14. 10. 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!