16.01.2013 Views

27. araştırma sonuçları toplantısı 3. cilt - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

27. araştırma sonuçları toplantısı 3. cilt - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

27. araştırma sonuçları toplantısı 3. cilt - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

at Murit Tepe, and four höyüks at Kızılca (Emirbağ), Elvançelebi, Bekişler,<br />

and Aşağı Körücek. 1 Murit Tepe and the four höyüks were not occupied in<br />

the historic era, but there were later Roman and/or Byzantine phases at both<br />

Kabak Tepesi and Hisarkavak, as well as a late Roman/Byzantine settlement<br />

near Murit Tepe, suggesting significant changes between the EBA and the<br />

Late Roman Empire.<br />

The earliest mention of Euchaita is during the Roman period, when it was<br />

a village in the territory of Amasya in first the Roman province of Pontus<br />

(198/230 – Diocletian), then in the province of Helenopontus which was<br />

created out of Pontus in the early fourth century. From the fourth century it<br />

began to gain a reputation as the centre of the cult of St Theodore Tiro (‘the<br />

Recruit’) martyred under the emperor Maximinus (308-313), but its remoteness<br />

is suggested by its use as a place of exile for the bishops Peter Mongus (482),<br />

Euphemius (496), and Macedonius (511). The emperor Anastasius I (491-518)<br />

made Euchaita a city and ga<strong>ve</strong> it a wall and a bishop, though the first securely<br />

attested bishop was Epiphanius who attended the sixth Ecumenical Council in<br />

Constantinople in 680. 2 Euchaita has been identified with the modern village<br />

of Beyözü, previously known as Avkat, fi<strong>ve</strong> kilometres north of Mecitözü, as<br />

well as at Elvançelebi, Çorum, and Mecitözü.<br />

From the se<strong>ve</strong>nth century, Euchaita became a military base behind the<br />

frontier. It remained a provincial centre, although of significance mostly for<br />

the cult of St. Theodore whose collection of Miracles from the later se<strong>ve</strong>nth or<br />

eighth centuries A.D. offers important information about local conditions; the<br />

letters of John Mauropous, who held the see in the mid-ele<strong>ve</strong>nth century, also<br />

describe many aspects of life in the town.<br />

1 Sipahi, T. and Yıldırım, Y., ‘2001 Yılı Çorum <strong>ve</strong> Çankırı Bölgeleri Yüzey Araştırması’, 20<br />

Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı (Ankara, 2003), Vol. 2. 275-284; Sipahi, T. and Yıldırım, Y., ‘2002<br />

Yılı Çorum <strong>ve</strong> Çankırı İlleri Yüzey Araştırması’, 21 Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı (Ankara,<br />

2004), Vol. 2. 305-314; Sipahi, T. and Yıldırım, Y., ‘2003 Yılı Çorum <strong>ve</strong> Çankırı İlleri Yüzey<br />

Araştırmaları’, 22 Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı (Ankara, 2005), Vol. 2. 353-364.<br />

2 Mango, C., and Ševčenko, I., ‘Three Inscriptions of the Reign of Anastasius I and Constantine<br />

V’, BZ 65 (1972), 379–393<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!