EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3
EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3 EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3
176 Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and TurkeyWidespread view on Africa in the West, is a cynical and mostly inaccurateone. For instance The Economist (May 13 - 19, 2000) published a specialissue on Africa titled “Hopeless Continent”. In this issue Africa’s leaders anddonors are characterized as morons. This may well be true for isolated casesbut characterizing the entire continent as such and to blame it all on “Africansociety” can not be accurate at all. This approach probably comes from amindset of some insensitive and tactless individual.According to such individuals Africa is malnourished, poor, dusty andgoverned by crook dictators. For instance, referring to a failed coup attempt bya group of Western mercenaries, ‘The Guardian’, respectable British daily, recentlyreported that “the men on board the Boeing 727-100 had allegedly beenon their way to mount a coup in Equatorial Guinea, a small, malarial countryin west Africa ruled by a tyrant but newly and filthily rich in offshoreoil”.The men on board are inevitably (!) led by a James Bond 007 figure, “theOld Etonian and former SAS officer” (hence a well established gentleman!)Mr. Simon Mann who was arrested at Harare Airport, in Zimbabwe, UK’s archenemy in Africa, alongside a plane load of mercenaries who landed there topick up consignment of AK47 rifles, mortar bombs, and 75,000 rounds of ammunition.”Having realized the severity of his situation Mr. Mann began writingletters from his cell in maximum security Chikuribu prison firstly implicatingMark Thatcher (Scratcher in Mann’s notes), an arms dealer and formerPrime Minister Iron lady Margaret Thatcher’s son. Mr. Mann then linked“what had at first seemed to be little more than a doomed Boy’s Own adventurein a forgotten corner of west Africa to a coterie of rightwing businessmenwith links to the highest echelons of the British establishment” 4 .So much for “white man’s burden!”.It is not only that such Afro-pessimist views are offensive and damagingbut they also hinder understanding the true potential and economic performanceof Africa. Turkey needs to develop a discourse that emerges through its ownspecific interaction with Africa. Turkey should also avoid established Afropessimismdeveloped in the West and evaluate African experience by drawingon its own experience with the world which is mainly manifesting itself in theprocess of full membership talks with the European Union.The next section looks at African economic performance by concentratingon primarily human progress. It compares human development with theHICs (High Income Countries) of the OECD and Turkey. African agriculture
The New Turkish-African Economic Relations 177and urbanization are also compared with the experiences of other developingcountries.IV. African Progress In Comparative PerspectiveMost of Africa is late starter in economic development. In many ways,Africans are still tackling with the devastating affects of the colonial era. Sincethe 1950s, when Africans began to take their fate into their own hands afterdefeating colonialists, there appears some strong evidence on human progressand improvement in their welfare 5 .A staunch critique of Afro-pessimism Professor John Sender emphasizesthat, (Sender 1999, p. 100 – 101);Thinking about development in Africa requires holding at least two setsof ideas in one’s head at the same time. It is not sufficient to stress the ubiquityof failure, malnutrition, disease, predatory states and war, or to becomeoverwhelmed by revulsion in the face of misery still experienced by so manyAfricans. In addition, it must also be recognised that some important aspectsof the lives of millions of ordinary people have been transformed over the lastfive decades. It is on the basis of a clear perception of the complexity and unevennessof all these processes, as well as a critical analysis of the consequencesof economic policies in the past, that politically realistic development strategiescan be formulated.John Sender’s criticisms provides a valid and important insight to the intellectualfailures of the policy makers. Their ability to hold “two different ideasspontaneously together in their head” is hindered mainly by the Afro-pessimistinterpretations of the African experience. In fact, Africa’s story is morecomplex than the one suggested by the commonly used macro-economic indicatorsand the one interpreted simplistically by Afro-pessimism.Political economy of development approach attempts to link human welfareimprovements to the causal economic processes underlying such occurrence.This suggests that improvements in human welfare ought to be capturedby a wealth of evidence emerging from changing class relations that arecrystallized around the increases in the numbers of wage earners. This kind ofdevelopment signifies transformation of a society from a rural – agriculturalone to an industrial – urban one. Accompanying process is the improvementof the use of skilled workers, technology and other forces of production. Thistype of transformation requires more dynamic relations of production. The viewthat present capitalist development as the progressist dynamic in the historyof humanity is very much underway in Africa and this process is led increasinglyby indigenous African capitalist classes. This process anticipates a
- Page 17 and 18: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 19 and 20: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 21 and 22: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 23 and 24: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 25 and 26: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 27 and 28: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 29 and 30: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 31 and 32: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 33 and 34: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 35 and 36: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 37 and 38: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 39 and 40: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 41 and 42: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 43 and 44: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 45 and 46: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 47 and 48: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 49 and 50: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 51 and 52: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 53 and 54: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 55 and 56: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 57 and 58: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 59 and 60: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 61 and 62: The New Turkish - African Economic
- Page 63 and 64: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 65 and 66: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 67: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 71 and 72: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 73 and 74: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 75 and 76: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 77 and 78: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 79 and 80: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 81 and 82: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 83 and 84: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 85 and 86: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 87 and 88: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 89 and 90: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 91 and 92: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 93 and 94: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 95 and 96: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 97 and 98: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 99 and 100: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 101 and 102: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 103 and 104: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 105 and 106: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 107 and 108: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 109 and 110: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 111 and 112: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 113 and 114: D›fl Yard›m ve Afrika’n›n K
- Page 115 and 116: D›fl Yard›m ve Afrika’n›n K
- Page 117 and 118: D›fl Yard›m ve Afrika’n›n K
The New Turkish-<strong>Africa</strong>n Economic Relations 177<strong>and</strong> urbanization are also compared with the experiences of other de<strong>ve</strong>lopingcountries.IV. <strong>Africa</strong>n Progress In Comparati<strong>ve</strong> Perspecti<strong>ve</strong>Most of <strong>Africa</strong> is late starter in economic de<strong>ve</strong>lopment. In many ways,<strong>Africa</strong>ns are still tackling with the devastating affects of the colonial era. Sincethe 1950s, when <strong>Africa</strong>ns began to take their fate into their own h<strong>and</strong>s afterdefeating colonialists, there appears some strong evidence on human progress<strong>and</strong> impro<strong>ve</strong>ment in their welfare 5 .A staunch critique of Afro-pessimism Professor John Sender emphasizesthat, (Sender 1999, p. 100 – 101);Thinking about de<strong>ve</strong>lopment in <strong>Africa</strong> requires holding at least two setsof ideas in one’s head at the same time. It is not sufficient to stress the ubiquityof failure, malnutrition, disease, predatory states <strong>and</strong> war, or to becomeo<strong>ve</strong>rwhelmed by revulsion in the face of misery still experienced by so many<strong>Africa</strong>ns. In addition, it must also be recognised that some important aspectsof the li<strong>ve</strong>s of millions of ordinary people ha<strong>ve</strong> been transformed o<strong>ve</strong>r the lastfi<strong>ve</strong> decades. It is on the basis of a clear perception of the complexity <strong>and</strong> une<strong>ve</strong>nnessof all these processes, as well as a critical analysis of the consequencesof economic policies in the past, that politically realistic de<strong>ve</strong>lopment strategiescan be formulated.John Sender’s criticisms provides a valid <strong>and</strong> important insight to the intellectualfailures of the policy makers. Their ability to hold “two different ideasspontaneously together in their head” is hindered mainly by the Afro-pessimistinterpretations of the <strong>Africa</strong>n experience. In fact, <strong>Africa</strong>’s story is morecomplex than the one suggested by the commonly used macro-economic indicators<strong>and</strong> the one interpreted simplistically by Afro-pessimism.Political economy of de<strong>ve</strong>lopment approach attempts to link human welfareimpro<strong>ve</strong>ments to the causal economic processes underlying such occurrence.This suggests that impro<strong>ve</strong>ments in human welfare ought to be capturedby a wealth of evidence emerging from changing class relations that arecrystallized around the increases in the numbers of wage earners. This kind ofde<strong>ve</strong>lopment signifies transformation of a society from a rural – agriculturalone to an industrial – urban one. Accompanying process is the impro<strong>ve</strong>mentof the use of skilled workers, technology <strong>and</strong> other forces of production. Thistype of transformation requires more dynamic relations of production. The viewthat present capitalist de<strong>ve</strong>lopment as the progressist dynamic in the historyof humanity is <strong>ve</strong>ry much underway in <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong> this process is led increasinglyby indigenous <strong>Africa</strong>n capitalist classes. This process anticipates a