EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3
EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3 EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3
170 Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkeypromote a more publicly responsible and transparent government in the region.The other fundamental reason is the rise of South-South trade and increaseddemand for African primary sector goods both by Turkey and other fastgrowing economies of Asia which will be explained in detail later on in thisstudy.This paper focuses on Turkey’s recent interaction with sub-Saharan Africa.It draws on the seminal study by Professor John Sender (1999) and warnsabout the limits of Afro-pessimism, the perspective that presupposes Africanexperience as a tragedy. In the Western milieu, journalists, politicians and academicsacross the spectrum appear to agree on a pessimistic prognosis of Africa.In the words of a South African academic John Sender (1999) “they commonlyuse a language that evokes disappointment, moralistic outrage, repugnanceand a barely concealed, if not overt, contempt for African ‘barbarism’.The predominant and stomach churning metaphors are medical/biological:blood, rot, scars, mutilation, plagues, deterioration, starvation, and pathologicalcrises are said to be endemic.” The pessimist interpretation of Africa’s experienceis prevalent in the West. Most Western governments, Bretton-WoodsInstitutions (BWIs) and International Financial Institutions (IFSs) adopt suchunderstanding. Unfortunately, Afro-pessimism is also prevalent in AfricaUndoubtedly Africa has its own problems and turning a blind eye onthem helps no one. Corruption, civil wars, mismanagement, disease and crookedleaders exists in some countries across the continent. History of the continenttells us that, Africa and Africans are not the sole causes of these problems.In fact the problem lies somewhere else as is the case with debt. For theproblem of debt to become this severe requires not only crooked leaders butalso lending at enormous magnitude for some vile reasons.This paper argues that influence of Afro-pessimism in Turkey can be damagingto the fledgling relations with Africa. Here, following Professor Sender’sapproach, I argue that Afro-pessimist view is an inadequate starting pointto develop a serious economic relationship. This warning is timely and necessary.Although Turkish literature can be viewed mainly as realistic and objectiveas highlighted later on in this paper there also exist the use of some malevolentvocalizations with reference to Africa.It would be erroneous for Turkey to begin understanding African development,performance and economic potential through the prism of Afro-pessimism.Sender (1999, p. 90) warns us that “the simplicity of this approach failsto appreciate the complexity of processes of social and economic change byfocusing too exclusively on only unappealing dynamics of capitalist develop-
The New Turkish-African Economic Relations 171ment while other important features of the recent economic history of Africathat have been neglected by the protagonists of nausea, marginalization anddisdain”. For Sender, any critical view of such rushed judgments will serve usto understand Africa’s real economic potential.This paper is organised as follows; the next section establishes the dimensionsof Turkey’s trade relations with sub-Saharan Africa. Section 3 then beginsto highlight the underpinnings of the Afro-pessimist view and its dangerousreverberations on the Turkish milieu. That section suggested avoidance ofAfro-pessimism not only because it is offensive but also because it is scientificallyflawed, particularly when analysed through the prism of a historicalperspective grounded on the solid foundation of political economy framework.Then the following section 4 reports on the historical findings particularly thoserelating to human progress, agricultural development and economic growth.In this section it is shown that African development since independence during1950s and 1960s has been very rapid. Despite damaging impacts of the colonialperiod and despite being a late starter, when compared to the other regions,development of forces of production in Africa have been impressive. Thisline of reasoning sheds a different light to the African experience, as a whole.Hence, it helps interrogating the policy prescriptions by international organizationsprepared on the basis of Afro-pessimist view. The last section drawssome lessons and concludes.II. Africa - Turkey trade relationsLarge number of publicly available evidence indicate a recent surge ineconomic interaction between Turkey and Africa (Çak›ro¤lu 2005, K›rbafll›2005, Kara 2005). This recent economic interaction demonstrates itself mainlyin the volumes of trade. Investigating trade relations help establishing the degreeand intensity of any economic collaboration between countries and regions.In this respect, one needs to analyze the differences in influence of the recentand ongoing changes on both product composition and direction of tradein Turkey and in Africa 1 .In this section trade statistics are studied to establish the level of economicinteraction between Turkey and Africa.The rise in economic interaction largely comes from current economiccycle in the world trade. During recent years, importance of South - South tradehas increased considerably due to output growth in some large developingeconomies, particularly China and India. The rise of South - South trade hasallowed Africa to recoup some of its market shares in primary products. UNC-TAD (2005) report insinuates that the rise in South - South exports of primary
- Page 11 and 12: 11 Eylül, Dünya Siyaseti ve Afrik
- Page 13 and 14: 11 Eylül, Dünya Siyaseti ve Afrik
- Page 15 and 16: 11 Eylül, Dünya Siyaseti ve Afrik
- Page 17 and 18: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 19 and 20: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 21 and 22: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 23 and 24: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 25 and 26: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 27 and 28: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 29 and 30: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 31 and 32: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 33 and 34: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 35 and 36: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 37 and 38: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 39 and 40: Afrika Birli¤i ve Libya’n›n Af
- Page 41 and 42: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 43 and 44: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 45 and 46: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 47 and 48: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 49 and 50: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 51 and 52: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 53 and 54: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 55 and 56: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 57 and 58: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 59 and 60: Yeni Türk-Afrika Ekonomik ‹liflk
- Page 61: The New Turkish - African Economic
- Page 65 and 66: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 67 and 68: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 69 and 70: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 71 and 72: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 73 and 74: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 75 and 76: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 77 and 78: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 79 and 80: The New Turkish-African Economic Re
- Page 81 and 82: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 83 and 84: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 85 and 86: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 87 and 88: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 89 and 90: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 91 and 92: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 93 and 94: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 95 and 96: Afrika’n›n Kalk›nmas›nda D
- Page 97 and 98: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 99 and 100: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 101 and 102: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 103 and 104: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 105 and 106: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 107 and 108: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 109 and 110: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
- Page 111 and 112: The Role and Effeciency of Foreign
170 Yükselen <strong>Afrika</strong> <strong>ve</strong> Türkiye / <strong>Rising</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Turkey</strong>promote a more publicly responsible <strong>and</strong> transparent go<strong>ve</strong>rnment in the region.The other fundamental reason is the rise of South-South trade <strong>and</strong> increaseddem<strong>and</strong> for <strong>Africa</strong>n primary sector goods both by <strong>Turkey</strong> <strong>and</strong> other fastgrowing economies of Asia which will be explained in detail later on in thisstudy.This paper focuses on <strong>Turkey</strong>’s recent interaction with sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong>.It draws on the seminal study by Professor John Sender (1999) <strong>and</strong> warnsabout the limits of Afro-pessimism, the perspecti<strong>ve</strong> that presupposes <strong>Africa</strong>nexperience as a tragedy. In the Western milieu, journalists, politicians <strong>and</strong> academicsacross the spectrum appear to agree on a pessimistic prognosis of <strong>Africa</strong>.In the words of a South <strong>Africa</strong>n academic John Sender (1999) “they commonlyuse a language that evokes disappointment, moralistic outrage, repugnance<strong>and</strong> a barely concealed, if not o<strong>ve</strong>rt, contempt for <strong>Africa</strong>n ‘barbarism’.The predominant <strong>and</strong> stomach churning metaphors are medical/biological:blood, rot, scars, mutilation, plagues, deterioration, starvation, <strong>and</strong> pathologicalcrises are said to be endemic.” The pessimist interpretation of <strong>Africa</strong>’s experienceis prevalent in the West. Most Western go<strong>ve</strong>rnments, Bretton-WoodsInstitutions (BWIs) <strong>and</strong> International Financial Institutions (IFSs) adopt suchunderst<strong>and</strong>ing. Unfortunately, Afro-pessimism is also prevalent in <strong>Africa</strong>Undoubtedly <strong>Africa</strong> has its own problems <strong>and</strong> turning a blind eye onthem helps no one. Corruption, civil wars, mismanagement, disease <strong>and</strong> crookedleaders exists in some countries across the continent. History of the continenttells us that, <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>ns are not the sole causes of these problems.In fact the problem lies somewhere else as is the case with debt. For theproblem of debt to become this se<strong>ve</strong>re requires not only crooked leaders butalso lending at enormous magnitude for some vile reasons.This paper argues that influence of Afro-pessimism in <strong>Turkey</strong> can be damagingto the fledgling relations with <strong>Africa</strong>. Here, following Professor Sender’sapproach, I argue that Afro-pessimist view is an inadequate starting pointto de<strong>ve</strong>lop a serious economic relationship. This warning is timely <strong>and</strong> necessary.Although Turkish literature can be viewed mainly as realistic <strong>and</strong> objecti<strong>ve</strong>as highlighted later on in this paper there also exist the use of some malevolentvocalizations with reference to <strong>Africa</strong>.It would be erroneous for <strong>Turkey</strong> to begin underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>Africa</strong>n de<strong>ve</strong>lopment,performance <strong>and</strong> economic potential through the prism of Afro-pessimism.Sender (1999, p. 90) warns us that “the simplicity of this approach failsto appreciate the complexity of processes of social <strong>and</strong> economic change byfocusing too exclusi<strong>ve</strong>ly on only unappealing dynamics of capitalist de<strong>ve</strong>lop-