16.07.2015 Views

EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3

EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3

EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 Yükselen <strong>Afrika</strong> <strong>ve</strong> Türkiye / <strong>Rising</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Turkey</strong>tions—the WB <strong>and</strong> the IMF through the Bretton Woods Agreement underAmerican supervision in 1944, <strong>and</strong> the General Agreement on Tariffs <strong>and</strong>Trade (GATT) in 1947.O<strong>ve</strong>rseas aid as a process within the context of international politicalpower struggles (including the Cold War <strong>and</strong> the division of the world intothree worlds) became the major economic instrument o<strong>ve</strong>r the third worldcountries to the contending ideological sides in the post World War II period.It became an instrument of foreign policy as an extension of the internal politicsof the donor countries. It was first introduced as a programme to facilitateshort-term war reco<strong>ve</strong>ry (rehabilitation of economies temporarily damaged bythe War) of both Western <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe. This was the spirit of the 1948-1952 Marshall Plan. This Marshall Plan was subsequently extended to a secondphase in the early 1950s. The international aid regime began to focus ontechnical, military <strong>and</strong> economic packages, which this time included poorregions such as Greece, <strong>Turkey</strong> <strong>and</strong> later Korea in a bid to counter communism<strong>and</strong> impro<strong>ve</strong> the economic st<strong>and</strong>ards of these countries. The latter was supposedto demonstrate the superiority of the virtues of non-communist, democraticmarket economies.This need to transfer money in the form of aid for economic gains inWestern countries became more pronounced after the Second World War, <strong>and</strong>more so with the gaining of independence of many colonies in the 1960s. Thedemise of the colonial empires in <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong> Asia was to mark the third phaseof the aid regime. Fundamentally, it was an extension of the same moti<strong>ve</strong>s aspreviously. Here efforts were geared towards establishment of militaryalliances <strong>and</strong> diplomatic alignments with former colonial masters <strong>and</strong> hence,the de<strong>ve</strong>lopment of bilateral aid programmes. This was at a time when independent<strong>Africa</strong>n states where groping for ways to unite the continent as theonly way to enable de<strong>ve</strong>lopment to take place. Within this context, o<strong>ve</strong>rseasaid was being viewed as an obstacle to the unification <strong>and</strong> transformation ofthe continent. Progressi<strong>ve</strong> leaders such as Nyerere, Nkrumah, Sekou Toure,Senghor, <strong>and</strong> others regarded aid, e<strong>ve</strong>n though needed, as part of neo-colonialmachination.Nyerere, for example, was to point out in 1960 that the West was for thefurther balkanization of <strong>Africa</strong> rather than its unity, since it was easier tomanipulate a divided <strong>Africa</strong>: “They will flatter <strong>and</strong> bribe us <strong>and</strong> produce e<strong>ve</strong>ngreater arguments for the perpetuation of the balkanization of East <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>and</strong>exploit our need for technical assistance to keep us divided.” Furthermore,“The flattery <strong>and</strong> corruption of <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders in order to keep them separat-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!