16.07.2015 Views

EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3

EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3

EN - FR - Yükselen Afrika ve Türkiye / Rising Africa and Turkey 3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Role <strong>and</strong> Effeciency of Foreign Aid in <strong>Africa</strong>’s De<strong>ve</strong>lopment 217with the greatest MDG in<strong>ve</strong>stment needs <strong>and</strong> most vulnerable in the world toa persistent po<strong>ve</strong>rty trap. There are fi<strong>ve</strong> structural reasons gi<strong>ve</strong>n by theMillennium Project: <strong>ve</strong>ry high transport costs <strong>and</strong> small markets (this situationis e<strong>ve</strong>n more dire in the l<strong>and</strong>locked countries), low-productivity agriculture,<strong>ve</strong>ry high disease burden, a history of ad<strong>ve</strong>rse geopolitics <strong>and</strong> <strong>ve</strong>ry slow diffusionof technology from abroad. Aid has to take into account these realitiesas well as their underlying causes. Constraints which could hamper the effecti<strong>ve</strong>nessof assistance (including lack of various capacities <strong>and</strong> sustainability)should be addressed in practical ways, factoring in past experience <strong>and</strong> opinionof a broad spectrum of stakeholders.As an example of targeted aid that has had substantial impact, is ODA toAsia from Japan that created support to transformed economies of partnercountries <strong>and</strong> raised their status to middle income <strong>and</strong> provided the East AsianMiracle. Japan was the largest donor from 1991 to 2000, its ODA between1990 to 2003 was US$153.3 billion, which represents nearly one-fifth of totalODA provided during that period <strong>and</strong> largest among DAC member countries.For current volume, in 2003 Japan provided US $8.9 billion (net disbursement)<strong>and</strong> US$13.0 billion (gross disbursement) while the DAC a<strong>ve</strong>rage wasUS$3.1 billion (net disbursement). Asia recei<strong>ve</strong>d 53.6% of its total bilateralODA-US$3.2 billion out of US$6.0 billion in 2003 (according to the OECDIDS Online 4 CRS 2005). With regard to <strong>Africa</strong> Japan has provided bilateralassistance <strong>and</strong> de<strong>ve</strong>lopment assistance through the TICAD process amountingto more than US$12.7 billion in areas such as basic human needs, infrastructure,<strong>and</strong> agriculture.The rise in aid has been significant <strong>and</strong> ODA increased by US$12 billionfrom 2002 to 2004. The world’s largest donor, the United States hasannounced the biggest increases in its national aid programmes since 1960s.Their increase in de<strong>ve</strong>lopment assistance accounts to US$8 billion, althoughthe increase has been from a low base measured in terms of aid as a share ofnational income, it includes large aid transfers for Afghanistan (which is anLDC), <strong>and</strong> Iraq.The Group of Eight (G 8 industrial Countries) summit in 2005 provideda boost to de<strong>ve</strong>lopment assistance in the form of additional debt relief <strong>and</strong> newcommitments on aid. The United Kingdom through its support to theCommission for <strong>Africa</strong> is urging their European Union colleagues to assist<strong>Africa</strong> through a new “Marshal Plan” for <strong>Africa</strong>’s revival advocating the doublingof aid <strong>and</strong> total debt write off. This initiati<strong>ve</strong> has been welcomed <strong>and</strong>endorsed by <strong>Africa</strong>n Ministers at the Cape Town meeting of the Commissionfor <strong>Africa</strong>. A number of European Union members ha<strong>ve</strong> pledged support to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!