taban arazi üzerindeki deÄiÅik toprak profillerinin oluÅumu ...
taban arazi üzerindeki deÄiÅik toprak profillerinin oluÅumu ... taban arazi üzerindeki deÄiÅik toprak profillerinin oluÅumu ...
iiiABSTRACTFORMATION, CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENTSOIL PROFILES ON BASELANDİsmail Fatih ORMANCIThe objectives of this study, carried out on baseland, were description andclassification of soils, interpretation of relationships among soil profilecharacteristics, soil environment and forming factors and processes. The Kumacıkplain is situated in Western Mediterrian Region and 15 km north of Isparta province.In this study, the planned analysis were made to soils on 30 disturbed andundisturbed soil samples taken from defined horisons of six soil profiles dug on soilindividuals which have significant morphological differences. Profile description,particle size disturbation analysis, spesific gravity, bulk density, field capacity,porosity, pH, lime content, cation Exchange capacity, exchangable cations, electricalconductivity, free Fe 2 O 3 and available phosporus values were used in differntiatingof soils.Soil profiles were classified according to soil taxonomy as fallows; First and 2 th.profiles as Typic Hydraquent sub group, 3 th. and 5 th. profiles as Typic Xerofluventsub group, 4 th. profile as Vertic Haploxerept sub group and 6 th. profile as VerticHaploxeroll sub group. These profiles were classified according to FAO/UNESCOsystem as follows; First and 2 th. profiles as Calcaric Gleysol group, 3 th. and 5 th.profiles as Calcaric Fluvisol group, 4 th. profile as Vertic Cambisol and 6 th. profileas Mollic Fluvisol group.KEYWORDS: Soil formation, soil profile, soil classification.
ivTEŞEKKÜRTez konumun seçiminden araştırmamın sonuçlandırılmasına kadar her türlükatkılarıyla çalışmalarımı yönlendiren, araştırmamın her aşamasında ilgi ve desteğinigördüğüm değerli hocam Prof. Dr. Mesut AKGÜL’e, araştırmamın her aşamasındaözellikle arazi çalışmalarında ilgi ve desteğini gördüğüm değerli hocam Dr. MetinMÜJDECİ’ye, Toprak bölümünün diğer öğretim üyeleri, çalışanları, öğrencileri vearaştırmayı mali yönden destekleyen Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi BilimselAraştırma Fonu (BAP 1281-YL-06 nolu proje)’na teşekkür ederim.Ayrıca tez çalışmam sırasında her türlü maddi ve manevi desteklerini esirgemeyen,babam Neşet ORMANCI, annem Nermin ORMANCI ve dayım Opr.Dr. MehmetŞENYÜZ’e teşekkür ederim.İsmail Fatih ORMANCIISPARTA - 2007
- Page 1 and 2: TABAN ARAZİ ÜZERİNDEKİDEĞİŞ
- Page 3: iiÖZETTABAN ARAZİ ÜZERİNDEKİ D
- Page 7 and 8: viÇİZELGELER DİZİNİSayfaÇizel
- Page 9 and 10: 2vardır. Zira toprağın sahip old
- Page 11 and 12: 4Alüviyal topraklar akarsular tara
- Page 13 and 14: 6artan bir şekilde ince tekstüre
- Page 15 and 16: 8yapılmıştır. Araştırma bölg
- Page 17 and 18: 103. MATERYAL VE METOT3.1. Materyal
- Page 19 and 20: 123.1.3. Jeolojik YapıIsparta ovas
- Page 21 and 22: 14Şekil 4. Çalışma Alanının T
- Page 23 and 24: 16Şekil 6. Landsat 7 ETM+ 6,4,1 Ba
- Page 25 and 26: 18Cg1 22-53 Yaş iken açık kahver
- Page 27 and 28: 202 Nolu ProfilÇalışma alanın o
- Page 29 and 30: 22Çizelge 4. 2 Nolu Profilin Fizik
- Page 31 and 32: 24C4 107+ Yaş iken koyu kahverengi
- Page 33 and 34: 264 Nolu ProfilBu Profil topraklar
- Page 35 and 36: 28Çizelge 8. 4 Nolu Profilin Fizik
- Page 37 and 38: 302C2 136+ Yaş iken koyu sarımsı
- Page 39 and 40: 326 Nolu ProfilDerin profilli topra
- Page 41 and 42: 34Çizelge 12. 6 Nolu Profilin Fizi
- Page 43 and 44: 363. Profil3 nolu profil A C horizo
- Page 45 and 46: 382. ProfilUzun yıllar su altında
- Page 47 and 48: 400,35 in üzerinde olmasından dol
- Page 49 and 50: 426. KAYNAKLARAkgül, M., Başayiğ
- Page 51 and 52: 44Sarı, M., 1998. Türkiye’deki
iiiABSTRACTFORMATION, CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENTSOIL PROFILES ON BASELANDİsmail Fatih ORMANCIThe objectives of this study, carried out on baseland, were description andclassification of soils, interpretation of relationships among soil profilecharacteristics, soil environment and forming factors and processes. The Kumacıkplain is situated in Western Mediterrian Region and 15 km north of Isparta province.In this study, the planned analysis were made to soils on 30 disturbed andundisturbed soil samples taken from defined horisons of six soil profiles dug on soilindividuals which have significant morphological differences. Profile description,particle size disturbation analysis, spesific gravity, bulk density, field capacity,porosity, pH, lime content, cation Exchange capacity, exchangable cations, electricalconductivity, free Fe 2 O 3 and available phosporus values were used in differntiatingof soils.Soil profiles were classified according to soil taxonomy as fallows; First and 2 th.profiles as Typic Hydraquent sub group, 3 th. and 5 th. profiles as Typic Xerofluventsub group, 4 th. profile as Vertic Haploxerept sub group and 6 th. profile as VerticHaploxeroll sub group. These profiles were classified according to FAO/UNESCOsystem as follows; First and 2 th. profiles as Calcaric Gleysol group, 3 th. and 5 th.profiles as Calcaric Fluvisol group, 4 th. profile as Vertic Cambisol and 6 th. profileas Mollic Fluvisol group.KEYWORDS: Soil formation, soil profile, soil classification.