11.07.2015 Views

10. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

10. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

10. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı - Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ha<strong>ve</strong> accumulated in subsequent centuries, but winter storms and the effectsof coastal erosion in recent years, as well as limited archaeologicalsondages, ha<strong>ve</strong> exposed portions of this structure in se<strong>ve</strong>ral places, Althoughit varies a little in its details, the wall's basic character, composedof a tough coııcrete aggregate of nıbble and occasional terracotta fragments,remains largely uniform throughout its length. The full height ofthe structure remairıs unknown, but as muclı as three metres of the heightof its seaward (east face) ha<strong>ve</strong> been exposed at se<strong>ve</strong>ral points (Figs. 5and 6). In alater phase of the.city's history the structure provided a basefor the new city-wall erected in the Iate fourth century where it frontedthe sea, but there can be no doubt that its original functiorı was to protecrthe city's waterfront from heavy seas at a time when there was no shinglebeach to obstruct the sea's encroachment.The presence of the sea can best be demonstrated at the southerrı extremityof the sea-wall where it turns sharply westwards to disappear intothe earth fill that has accumulated between the sea-wall's southeast cornerand the steep slope of the promontory to the south (Fig. 6). A remarkablefeature in the scarp of this fill is the total absence, except nearthe surface, of any sigrı of construction or of artificial floors. Pottery andother aıtefaers are also <strong>ve</strong>ry scarce, in contrast to the o<strong>ve</strong>rburden in otherparts of the city, This suggests that there was once a smail natural bay enclosedby higher ground at this point which would ha<strong>ve</strong> seı<strong>ve</strong>d as a modestharbour. Its entrance ınay be identified in the 25 metre gap that separaresthe southeast corner of the sea-wall from the remains of an ancientstructure built into a massi<strong>ve</strong> rock at the southern extremity of the modernbeach, The harbour was subsequently concealed by earth depositswashed down from the hill abo<strong>ve</strong> and by the formation of the gra<strong>ve</strong>lbeach to a considerable depth along the front of the ancient city-.The most striking eviderice that the sea orıce penetrated as far as thesea-front wall, howe<strong>ve</strong>r, is provided by the mouth of a large vaulted passage2.60 m in width running through the wall at apoint 65 m south ofthe noıthernmost extremity of the longest existing stretch of the wall(Figs. 4 and 7). This is in fact the outlet of a major drain that ıra<strong>ve</strong>rses thefuJi breadth of the city from west to east. For a considerable portian of itscourse it ıı.ıns underneath and supports the mosaic pa<strong>ve</strong>ment of the city'slarge palaestra, Since this building was ncaring completion around(2) The presence of a sccondary port may alsc be notcd. Stil! employed as an anehorage forsmaIl fishing boats, it nestlcs in a small bay Iocatcd on the cast llank of the outcnncst rockyspur of the promontory. Eviderice for its use in antiquity appears in rock cut steps Icadingfrom it Hud in a sınall building situated on a Ilat ledgc immediutely nbovc the harbor. Fordetails.see Russell, 1987.34-36.137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!