Hazar Raporu - Issue 02 - Winter 2012
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Abstratcs<br />
Prof. Dr Ercüment Tezcan – The Future of the EU: Myths and Realities (Page 31)<br />
Tezcan’s article focuses on the current economic and political crisis in European Union. He tries to evaluate possible<br />
scenarios regarding the political future of the union. The article acknowledges the precarious economic and<br />
political situation of the European Union. However the author mentions that such crises in the past have actually<br />
made the union more formidable.<br />
Prof. Dr Mesut Hakkı Caşin – Turkish Foreign Policy Towards Caspian and Central Asia (Page 52)<br />
Professor Caşin’s article examines the current state of relations between Turkey and the Caspian region. It provides<br />
historical background and the perspective regarding the future of the Turkey’s interaction with the region. The<br />
article underlines that the when Turkey’s engagement with the region started when the Soviet Union collapse,<br />
Turkey’s enthusiasm to project influence in the region was not welcomed by the other power brokers in the region.<br />
Turkey also lacked necessary political and economic means to compete in the region. However the author stresses<br />
that the current diplomatic and economic capacity of Turkey combined with the overall geostrategic changes in the<br />
region provide necessary conditions for Turkey and the region to advance their strategic partnership<br />
Dr. Şener Aktürk - Nationalism and Democratization in Turkey (Page 67)<br />
Şener Aktürk begins his discussion with the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and of Ottoman identity, while<br />
focusing on the origins and the nature of Turkish nationalism. He describes Ottoman identity as being based on<br />
four pillars: Muslim, Orthodox Christian, Armenian, and Jewish. With the founding of the Republic, the new<br />
nation-state aspired to transform the Muslim millet of the Ottoman identity into the Turkish nation. Against this<br />
background, the origins and the consequences of ethnically specific grievances of the Kurds and the Alevis, as<br />
well as the causes and results of the recent reforms also known as the Kurdish opening are explained. In discussing<br />
the future of the nascent Kurdish nation-state in northern Iraq, Aktürk finds implausible the fear of a greater<br />
Kurdistan, and compares it with the fear of a greater Turkistan in the early 20th century, which also proved to be<br />
unrealistic. He also argues that the European Union’s influence on identity-related reforms within Turkey has been<br />
far less than it is often assumed in the English-speaking media and academia, and certainly secondary to the role<br />
of domestic political actors and factors. Islamic multiculturalism has had a far greater and primary ideological role<br />
in justifying Turkish government’s implementation of the reforms also known as the Kurdish opening. Despite<br />
these democratic reforms, Aktürk is pessimistic about the prospects of a more inclusive national identity in a new<br />
constitution. He particularly highlights the fact that the current government, despite its success in major identityrelated<br />
reforms such as the Kurdish opening, has neither developed a new national identity emphasizing the unity<br />
of its citizens amidst ethnic diversity nor redefined “Turkishness” through a non-ethnic prism to allow for the<br />
expression of ethnic sub-identities while fostering a supraethnic Turkish patriotism. This failure is in part a result of<br />
the government’s lack of an intellectual and academic preparation for identity reforms.<br />
Prof. Dr Fuat Keyman – Turkish Foreign Policy (Page 85)<br />
Fuat Keyman evaluates last ten years of Turkish foreign policy and the changing landscape of the Middle East.<br />
Keyman considers that the has been notable success in Foreign Policy, however Turkey needs to be cautious<br />
regarding the changing dynamics in the region. Turkey’s position regarding the Arab revolutions is the right one<br />
with certain criticisms. He believes that the “zero problems with neighbors” policy was a right course for the past<br />
ten years, however the current strategic transformations in its neighborhood do necessitate a more realist approach<br />
in handling foreign policy.<br />
CASPIAN REPORT<br />
133 131