22.06.2021 Views

skönsmässigt beslutsfattande i processrättsliga frågor

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ervo, Laura, Changing civil proceedings – court service or state economy.

I: Erecinski, Tadeusz, Ervo, Laura, Nekrosius, Vytautas och Vebraite,

Vigita (red.), Recent trends in economy and efficiency of civil procedure,

s. 51–71. Vilnius University Press 2013.

Fasching, Kommentar Zivilprozessordnung, Manz Online-Bibliothek.

Tillgänglig på www.rdb.at, senast besökt 2013-02-24.

Fitger, Peter, Några tankar om antalet paragrafer i RB. I: Höglund, Olle,

Bengtsson, Bertil, Heuman, Lars och Ragnemalm, Hans, Festskrift

till Lars Welamson, s. 153–172. Norstedts förlag 1987.

Fitger, Peter, Får en domare ändra sig? I: Andersson, Torbjörn och Lindell,

Bengt, Festskrift till Per Henrik Lindblom, s. 151–162. Iustus

2004.

Fitger, Peter med flera, Kommentar till rättegångsbalken. Norstedts förlag.

Lösbladssystem, uppdaterat t.o.m. suppl. 77 (cit. RBK).

Flynn, Leo, When national procedural autonomy meets the effectiveness

of Community law, can it survive the impact?, ERA-Forum 2008,

s. 245–258.

Flyvbjerg, Bent, Making Social Science Matter. Why social inquiry fails

and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press 2001.

Frank, Arthur W., The feel for power games: everyday phronesis and social

theory. I: Flyvbjerg, Bent, Landman, Todd och Sanford, Schram

(red.), Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis, s. 48–65. Cambridge

University Press 2012.

Freivalds, Laila, Inledningsanförande, Svensk Juristtidning 1999, s. 398–

399.

Frände, Dan, [Anmälan av] Katrin Lainpelto, Stödbevisning i brottmål

(ak.avh.), Jura Förlag, 2012, 336 s., Juridisk Tidskrift 2012/13

s. 470–477.

Galetta, Diana-Urania, Procedural Autonomy of EU Member States: Paradise

Lost? Springer 2010.

Galič, Aleš, (In)compatibility of Procedural Preclusions with the Goals of

Civil Justice: An Ongoing Debate in Slovenia. I: Uzelac, Alan (red.),

Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial

Systems, s. 221–243. Springer 2014.

Galič, Aleš, The Aversion Against Judicial Discretion in Civil Procedure in

Post-communist Countries: Can the Influence of EU Law Change It? I:

Bobek, Michal (red.), Central European Judges under the European

Influence: The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited. Hart,

kommande 2015.

Galligan, D.J., Discretionary Powers: a Legal Study of Official Discretion.

Clarendon Press 1986.

294

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!