skönsmässigt beslutsfattande i processrättsliga frågor
Bylander, Eric, Modernare rättegång – och bättre? Svensk Juristtidning2007, s. 516–526.Bylander, Eric, Om jävsprövningen i TPB-målet, Juridisk Publikation2009, s. 175–198.Bylund, Torleif, Repetitionskompendium i processrätt (8 uppl.). Iustus2010.van Calster, Geert, The EU’s Tower of Babel – The Interpretation by theEuropean Court of Justice of Equally Authentic Texts Drafted in morethan one Official Language, Yearbook of European Law 1997, s. 363–394.Cappelletti, Mauro, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective.Clarendon Press 1989.Caranta, Roberto, [Anmälan av] C-2/06 Willy Kempter KG mot HauptzollamtHamburg-Jonas, Common Market Law Review 2005,s. 179–188.Caranta, Roberto, On Discretion. I: Prechal, Sacha och van Roermund,Bert (red.), The Coherence of EU Law: The Search for Unity inDivergent Concepts, s. 185–216. Oxford University Press 2008.Chase, Oscar G., Discretion in cultural context. I: Storme, Marcel ochHess, Burkhard (red.), Discretionary power of the judge: limits andcontrol, s. 315–335. Kluwer 2003.van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter, The Confusing Constitutional Status of PositiveProcedural Obligations in EU Law, Review of European AdministrativeLaw 2012, s. 81–100.Consolo, Claudio, Discretionary powers and hierarchy of judges: variationson four recent issues arising from case law and legislation (in the threemain civil law systems: France, Germany, Italy). I: Storme, Marcel ochHess, Burkhard (red.), Discretionary power of the judge: limits andcontrol, s. 285–298. Kluwer 2003.Constantinesco, Vlad, L’article 5 CEE, de la bonne foi à la loyauté communautaire.I: Capotorti, Francesco, Ehlermann, Claus-Dietrich,Frowein, Jochen Abr., Jacobs, Francis G., Joliet, R., Koopmans,Thijmen och Kovar, Robert (red.), Du droit international au droit del’intégration: Liber Amicorum Pierre Pescatore, s. 97–115. NomosVerlagsgesellschaft 1987.Craig, Paul P., Directives: direct effect, indirect effect and the constructionof national legislation, European Law Review 1997, s. 519–538.Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law (2 uppl.). Oxford University Press2012.Craig, Paul och de Búrca, Grainne, EU Law: Texts, Cases and Materials(5 uppl.). Oxford University Press 2011.290
Da Cruz Vilaça, José Luís, Le principe de l’effet utile du droit de L’Uniondans la jurisprudence de la Cour: I: Rosas, Allan, Levits, Egils och Bot,Yves (red.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe:Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law, s. 279–306.Asser Press 2013.Damaška, Mirjan R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A ComparativeApproach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press 1986.Dashwood, Alan, The Relationship between the Member States and theEuropean Union/European Community, Common Market Law Review2004, s. 355–381.Dashwood, Alan, Dougan, Michael, Rodger, Barry, Spaventa, Eleanoroch Wyatt, Derrick, Wyatt & Dashwood’s European Union Law(6 uppl.). Hart Publishing 2011.Davis, Kenneth Culp, Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. LouisianaState University Press 1969.Delicostopoulos, John, Towards European Procedural Primacy in NationalLegal Systems, European Law Journal 2003, s. 599–613.Derlén, Mattias, A castle in the air: the complexity of the multilingualinterpretation of European community law. Department of Law, UmeåUniversity 2007.Derlén, Mattias, In Defense of (Limited) Multilingualism: Problems andPossibilities of the Multilingual Interpretation of European Union Lawin National Courts. I: Kjær, Anne Lise och Adamo, Silvia (red.),Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy, s. 143–167. Ashgate2011.Derlén, Mattias, Multilingual interpretation of CJEU case law: rule andreality, European Law Review 2014, s. 295–315.Derrida, Jaques, Lagens kraft. Brutus Östlings bokförlag 2005.Dougan, Michael, National Remedies Before the Court of Justice: Issues ofHarmonisation and Differentiation. Hart Publishing 2004.Dougan, Michael, When Worlds Collide! Competing Visions of the RelationshipBetweeen Direct Effect and Supremacy, Common Market LawReview 2007, s. 931–963.Dougan, Michael, In defense of Mangold? I: Arnull, Anthony, Barnard,Christine, Dougan, Michael och Spaventa, Eleanor (red.), A ConstitutionalOrder of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour of AlanDashwood, s. 219–244. Hart Publishing 2011 (cit. A ConstitutionalOrder of States?).Dougan, Michael, The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remediesand Procedures for Enforcing Union Law Before National Courts. I:Craig, Paul och de Búrca, Grainne (red.), The Evolution of EU Law291
- Page 240 and 241: fallet. De tolkningsfakultativa reg
- Page 242 and 243: stolens praxis visar dessa fall sam
- Page 244 and 245: kringskärs eller helt bortfaller.
- Page 246 and 247: och kanske också beslutets innehå
- Page 248 and 249: Samma eller motsvarande kritik kan
- Page 250 and 251: mål finns ingen strid för genomsl
- Page 252 and 253: anpassning av nationell rätt till
- Page 254 and 255: kompetens och omdömesgillhet tas t
- Page 256 and 257: tiska beslut, som definitionsmässi
- Page 258 and 259: man vill uppnå med den eftersträv
- Page 260 and 261: trasted to mandatory rules. Its aim
- Page 262 and 263: The effect of EU law on the exercis
- Page 264 and 265: conditions in Kühne & Heitz, and u
- Page 266 and 267: thereby been handed out to a multip
- Page 268 and 269: of EU law, which outweighs all legi
- Page 270 and 271: This thesis argues that the existen
- Page 272 and 273: Proposition 2005/06:77 Genomförand
- Page 274 and 275: NJA 2006 s. 326NJA 2007 s. 108NJA 2
- Page 276 and 277: Mål 33/76 Rewe-Zentralfinanz eG oc
- Page 278 and 279: Mål C-72/95 Aannemersbedrijf P.K.
- Page 280 and 281: Mål C-144/04 Werner Mangold mot R
- Page 282 and 283: Förenade målen C-128/09, C-129/09
- Page 284 and 285: Förslag till avgörandeFörslag ti
- Page 286 and 287: Adinolfi, Adelina, The “Procedura
- Page 288 and 289: Bernitz, Ulf, Förhandsavgöranden
- Page 292 and 293: (2 uppl.), s. 407-438. Oxford Unive
- Page 294 and 295: Ervo, Laura, Changing civil proceed
- Page 296 and 297: Hagerup, Francis, Forelæsninger ov
- Page 298 and 299: Jans, Jan H. och Prinssen, Jolande
- Page 300 and 301: England, Danmark, Finland, Norge oc
- Page 302 and 303: Paunio, Elina och Lindroos-Hovinhei
- Page 304 and 305: Stein, P.A., Civil Procedure. I: Ch
- Page 306 and 307: Wallerman, Anna, Likvärdighetsprin
- Page 308 and 309: Zuckerman, Adrian, Zuckerman on Civ
- Page 310 and 311: RättsfallEU-domstolenAgrokonsultin
- Page 312 and 313: N.S., C-411/10 och C-493/10 167,215
- Page 314 and 315: SakregisterAAvvägningsrekvisit 59,
- Page 316: R mod 197 ff., 213 f., 224Rättegå
Bylander, Eric, Modernare rättegång – och bättre? Svensk Juristtidning
2007, s. 516–526.
Bylander, Eric, Om jävsprövningen i TPB-målet, Juridisk Publikation
2009, s. 175–198.
Bylund, Torleif, Repetitionskompendium i processrätt (8 uppl.). Iustus
2010.
van Calster, Geert, The EU’s Tower of Babel – The Interpretation by the
European Court of Justice of Equally Authentic Texts Drafted in more
than one Official Language, Yearbook of European Law 1997, s. 363–
394.
Cappelletti, Mauro, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective.
Clarendon Press 1989.
Caranta, Roberto, [Anmälan av] C-2/06 Willy Kempter KG mot Hauptzollamt
Hamburg-Jonas, Common Market Law Review 2005,
s. 179–188.
Caranta, Roberto, On Discretion. I: Prechal, Sacha och van Roermund,
Bert (red.), The Coherence of EU Law: The Search for Unity in
Divergent Concepts, s. 185–216. Oxford University Press 2008.
Chase, Oscar G., Discretion in cultural context. I: Storme, Marcel och
Hess, Burkhard (red.), Discretionary power of the judge: limits and
control, s. 315–335. Kluwer 2003.
van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter, The Confusing Constitutional Status of Positive
Procedural Obligations in EU Law, Review of European Administrative
Law 2012, s. 81–100.
Consolo, Claudio, Discretionary powers and hierarchy of judges: variations
on four recent issues arising from case law and legislation (in the three
main civil law systems: France, Germany, Italy). I: Storme, Marcel och
Hess, Burkhard (red.), Discretionary power of the judge: limits and
control, s. 285–298. Kluwer 2003.
Constantinesco, Vlad, L’article 5 CEE, de la bonne foi à la loyauté communautaire.
I: Capotorti, Francesco, Ehlermann, Claus-Dietrich,
Frowein, Jochen Abr., Jacobs, Francis G., Joliet, R., Koopmans,
Thijmen och Kovar, Robert (red.), Du droit international au droit de
l’intégration: Liber Amicorum Pierre Pescatore, s. 97–115. Nomos
Verlagsgesellschaft 1987.
Craig, Paul P., Directives: direct effect, indirect effect and the construction
of national legislation, European Law Review 1997, s. 519–538.
Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law (2 uppl.). Oxford University Press
2012.
Craig, Paul och de Búrca, Grainne, EU Law: Texts, Cases and Materials
(5 uppl.). Oxford University Press 2011.
290