23.02.2014 Views

Forskningsarbete pågår - Umeå universitet

Forskningsarbete pågår - Umeå universitet

Forskningsarbete pågår - Umeå universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘A Virtual Child’<br />

Liselotte Borgnon, Lärarhögskolan i Stockholm<br />

Introduction<br />

This article is written with the intention to trouble the notion of identity, and<br />

more specifically, the identity of the learning pre-school child. The argumentation<br />

is based on the theoretical perspective of the French philosophers Gilles Deleuze<br />

and Félix Guattari, and their notion of identity as a result of an ongoing process of<br />

subjugation. Identity from this perspective can never be seen as a natural feature<br />

of a living being, instead identity is a product of society’s will to control, code<br />

and normalize human behaviour. However, the control mechanisms at stake are<br />

not completely stable they find themselves in a constant condition of leakage.<br />

What Deleuze and Guattari call ‘free social energy’ constantly pours through the<br />

holes of the map of identity. ‘Lines of flight’ are constantly being constructed,<br />

away from predicted patterns and mappings of identity. In this article I am going<br />

to try to use experiences from the field of early childhood education to show<br />

how such a process of de- and re- territorialization, (eg. the deconstruction and<br />

reconstruction of new maps of identity) can function in relation to the identity<br />

of the learning pre-school child. I use two of Deleuze’s concepts; ‘a-lives’ and<br />

‘virtuality’ to propose, not a new identity of the learning pre-school child, but<br />

rather a position, or attitude, of careful, pragmatic experimentation in relation<br />

to the identity of the learning pre-school child.<br />

creation of identity<br />

The notion of identity is normally thought of as something psychologically<br />

natural or socially constructed. 1 However, with a Deleuzian perspective we can<br />

question these ideas. According to Deleuze and his colleague Felix Guattari,<br />

natural and social needs do not preceed the constitution of society’s institutions.<br />

It is rather the other way around. Institutions come forward, change and create<br />

natural needs and social demands.<br />

‘This break creates new or transformed institutions – schools, jails, hospitals-<br />

which in turn create ‘natural needs – that is, now incorporated<br />

344

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!