Bortom_Big_Five_28_nov_noc _pm_metod.pdf - Från One.com
Bortom_Big_Five_28_nov_noc _pm_metod.pdf - Från One.com
Bortom_Big_Five_28_nov_noc _pm_metod.pdf - Från One.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[293]. Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., & West,<br />
M. (2004). On the Validity of Subjective Measures of Company Performance. Personnel<br />
Psychology, 57, 95-118.<br />
[294]. van Dam, K. (2003). Trait perception in the employment interview: A five-factor model<br />
perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 43-55.<br />
[295]. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., Eidson, C. E., & Attenweiler, W. J. (2004).<br />
What do structured selection interviews really measure? The construct validity of behavior<br />
description interviews. Human Performance, 17, 71-93.<br />
[296]. Van Rooy, D. L., Alonso, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Group differences in emotional<br />
intelligence scores: Theoretical and practical implications. Personality and Individual<br />
Differences, 38, 689-700.<br />
[297]. Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic<br />
investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational Behavior,<br />
65, 71-95.<br />
[298]. Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution:<br />
Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182-196.<br />
[299]. Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Dyomina, N. V., Morewitz, C. L., & Reilly, R. R.<br />
(2006). Forced-Choice Personality Tests: A Measure of Personality and Cognitive<br />
Ability? Human Performance, 19, 175-199.<br />
[300]. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Develo<strong>pm</strong>ent and validation of brief<br />
measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality<br />
and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.<br />
[301]. Webb, E. (1915). Character and Intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 99.<br />
[302]. Weis, S., & Sűss, H.-M. (2007). Reviving the search for social intelligence - A multitrait-multimethod<br />
study of its structure and construct validity. Personality and Individual<br />
Differences, 42, 3-14.<br />
[303]. Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity. Understanding in<strong>nov</strong>ation in problem solving,<br />
science, invention, and the arts. New York: Wiley.<br />
[304]. Wetzler, S. (1992). Living with the passive-aggressive man. New York: Simon &<br />
Schuster.<br />
[305]. Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1996). A dyadic-interactional perspective<br />
on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality:<br />
Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88-162). New York: Guilford Press.<br />
[306]. Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & <strong>One</strong>s, D. S. (2005). Is There a General Factor in<br />
Ratings of Job Performance? A Meta-Analytic Framework for Disentangling Substantive<br />
and Error Influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108-131.<br />
[307]. Voda<strong>nov</strong>ich, S. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature.<br />
Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137, 569-595.<br />
[308]. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Garb, H. N. (2003). What's wrong<br />
with the Rorschach?: Science confronts the controversial inkblot test. San Francisco,<br />
CA, US: Jossey-Bass.<br />
[309]. Wright, P. M., Lichtenfels, P. A., & Pursell, E. (1989). The structured interview: additional<br />
studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 191-199.<br />
[310]. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. New York: Wiley.<br />
[311]. Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-Based Perspectives of Leadership. American Psychologist,<br />
62, 6-16.<br />
[312]. Zickar, M. J. (2000). Modeling faking on personality tests. In D. R. Ilgen & C. L. Hulin<br />
(Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline<br />
(pp. 95-113). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.<br />
164