Bortom_Big_Five_28_nov_noc _pm_metod.pdf - Från One.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[101]. Hofstee, W. K. B., Kiers, H. A., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1997). A comparison of Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15-31. [102]. Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 55-89. [103]. Hogan, R. (1992). Hogan Personality Inventory. Psychological Test Bulletin, 5, 130- 136. [104]. Hogan, R. (1994). Trouble at the top. Causes and consequences of managerial incompetence. Consulting Psychology Journal, 46, 9-15. [105]. Hogan, R. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah. [106]. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan Development Survey.: Hogan Assessment Systems. [107]. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2005). The Hogan Personality Inventory. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 329-351). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber. [108]. Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [109]. Hogan, R., Roberts, B. W., Walsh, W. B., Craik, K. H., & Price, R. H. (2000). A socioanalytic perspective on person-environment interaction. In K. H. Craik & R. H. Price (Eds.), Person-environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. [110]. Hogan, R., & Stokes, L. W. (2006). Business susceptibility to consulting fads: The case of emotional intelligence. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), A critique of emotional intelligence. What are the problems and how can they be fixed? (pp. 263-280). New York: Erlbaum. [111]. Hogan, R., & Wiggins, J. S. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 163-179). New York: Guilford. [112]. Hough, L. M. (1998). The millennium for personality psychology: New horizons or good ole daze. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 233-261. [113]. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future- -Remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664. [114]. Huang, H. M. (2006). Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 334-350. [115]. Husén, T. (1946). Psykologiska undersökningar av flygaspiranter. Tidskrift i Militär Hälsovård, 71, 51-98. [116]. Isen, A. M. (2003). Positive affect as a source of human strength. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 179-195). Washington, DC, US: APA. [117]. Jang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1556- 1565. [118]. Jensen, A. R. (1992). Spearman's Hypothesis: Methodology and Evidence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 225-233. [119]. Johnson, J. A. (2000). Developing a short form of the IPIP-NEO: A report to HGW Consulting. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, DuBois, PA. [120]. Johnson, J. A. (2005). Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Webbased personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 103-129. 154
[121]. Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1-19. [122]. Johnson, J. W. (2004). Factors Affecting Relative Weights: The Influence of Sampling and Measurement Error. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 283-299. [123]. Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238-257. [124]. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits - self esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability - with job satisfaction and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80- 92. [125]. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., Locke, E. A., Thoresen, C. J., Brett, J. M., & Drasgow, F. (2002). The scientific merit of valid measures of general concepts: Personality research and core self-evaluations. In J. M. Brett & F. Drasgow (Eds.), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research. (pp. 55-77): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah. [126]. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765- 780. [127]. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652. [128]. Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797-807. [129]. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfactionjob performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407. [130]. Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17, 325-346. [131]. Jung, C. G. (1921/1971). Psychological types. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. [132]. Jussim, L., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). Accuracy in Social Perception: Criticisms, Controversies, Criteria, Components, and Cognitive Processes. Advances in experimental social psychology, 37, 1-93. [133]. Kaiser, R. B., Hogan, R., & Craig, S. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63, 96-110. [134]. Kantor, M. (2002). Passive-aggression: A guide for the therapist, the patient and the victim: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group: Westport. [135]. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2000). Social intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 380-395). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [136]. Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1-11. [137]. Krosnick, J. A., Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Maximizing questionnaire quality. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes. (pp. 37-57): Academic Press: San Diego. [138]. Landy, F. J. (2006). The long, frustrating, and fruitless search for social intelligence: A cautionary tale. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), A critique of emotional intelligence. What are the problems and how can they be fixed? (pp. 81-123). New York: Erlbaum. 155
Page 1 and 2:
PSYKOLOGISK METOD AB Bortom Big Fiv
Page 3 and 4:
Innehåll Förord..................
Page 5:
Jagstyrka..........................
Page 8 and 9:
• Professor Robert McCrae, Nation
Page 11 and 12:
1. Inledning Syfte och bakgrund Syf
Page 13 and 14:
Betyder personligheten något som p
Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 1.1. Genomsnittliga regression
Page 17 and 18:
Exempel på testuppgifter i självr
Page 19 and 20:
• ”Det kanske finns flera över
Page 21 and 22:
Teoretisk vidareutveckling av FFM H
Page 23 and 24:
FFT antar att människor är relati
Page 25 and 26:
Cattells test 16 pf är från 1949.
Page 27 and 28:
Tabell 1.1. HPI-testets 7 dimension
Page 29 and 30:
Frekvens 20 15 10 5 0 -0,60 -0,40 -
Page 31 and 32:
Ett annat exempel från ännu en
Page 33:
Men låt oss återvända till anst
Page 36 and 37:
som en negativ prognosfaktor [208].
Page 38 and 39:
350 300 250 200 150 100 Antal 50 0
Page 40 and 41:
Balance work/life 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3
Page 42 and 43:
högt med ett självrapporttest av
Page 44 and 45:
- Avvisande av auktoriteter - Dölj
Page 46 and 47:
alltså en parallell till g-faktorn
Page 48 and 49:
Bedömt arbetsresultat 8 6 4 2 2 4
Page 50 and 51:
”Jag har aldrig kastat skräp på
Page 52 and 53:
Samarbetsvilja 5,5 5,0 4,5 4,0 3,5
Page 54 and 55:
Det är möjligt att validiteten ho
Page 57 and 58:
4. Studie 1 Syfte och uppläggning
Page 59 and 60:
Resultat Frekvens Taktikskalor 12 1
Page 61 and 62:
Tabell 4.4. Partialkorrelationer me
Page 63 and 64:
Första komponenten, korrigerade da
Page 65 and 66:
Antag att de 159 testade personerna
Page 67 and 68:
Tabell 4.7. Validitetskoefficienter
Page 69:
150 testuppgifter, inte bara en han
Page 72 and 73:
Frekvens 25 20 15 10 5 0 0,50 0,75
Page 74 and 75:
Tabell 5.3. Hierarkiska regressions
Page 76 and 77:
Tabell 6.3. Korrelationer mellan te
Page 78 and 79:
Tabell 6.5. Valideringar mot arbets
Page 80 and 81:
Slutsatser Studie 3 visade: • God
Page 82 and 83:
• Kreativitet är en mycket vikti
Page 84 and 85:
Begreppsvalidering Sambanden mellan
Page 86 and 87:
Tabell 7.5. Partialkorrelationer me
Page 88 and 89:
Figuren visar: Samarbetsvilja Arbet
Page 91 and 92:
8. Studie 5 och 6 Syfte och uppläg
Page 93 and 94:
Tabell 8.1. Åldersfördelning, Stu
Page 95 and 96:
Data från Studie 6 1,0 0,9 0,8 0,7
Page 97 and 98:
Utbildningsnivå förklarade bara e
Page 99 and 100:
Jagstyrka Korrelationer mellan de 1
Page 101 and 102:
Diskussion av Studie 5 och 6 De res
Page 103 and 104: 9. Studie 7 Syfte och uppläggning
Page 105 and 106: Tabell 9.2 Korrelationer mellan tre
Page 107 and 108: lan könen i balans på att kvinnor
Page 113 and 114: 12. Studie 10 Syfte och uppläggnin
Page 115 and 116: Tabell 12.2 Okorrigerade och korrig
Page 117 and 118: 13 Studie 11. Normdata, fortsatt va
Page 119 and 120: Korrelation med skönmålning efter
Page 121 and 122: En övervikt av positivt formulerad
Page 123 and 124: Korrelation index - jasägartendens
Page 125 and 126: Emotionell intelligens 0,3 0,2 0,1
Page 127 and 128: Tabell 13.5. Korrelationer mellan p
Page 129 and 130: Tabell 13.7. Relativa vikter för t
Page 131 and 132: Tabell 13.8. Medelvärden i personl
Page 133 and 134: Tabell 13.10. Korrelation mellan no
Page 135 and 136: angsteg, kvinnorna 1,5. Dessa resul
Page 137 and 138: hennes speciella idéer kan färga
Page 139 and 140: 14. Testets roll i beslutsfattandet
Page 141 and 142: 15. Personalekonomisk analys Hur st
Page 143 and 144: 16. Sammanfattning av resultat och
Page 145 and 146: Tabell 16.2. Sammanställning av be
Page 147 and 148: men valda för att de skulle vara r
Page 149 and 150: Litteraturförteckning [1]. Ahern,
Page 151 and 152: [40]. Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachs
Page 153: [82]. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P.
Page 157 and 158: [161]. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P.
Page 159 and 160: [197]. Passer, M. W., & Smith, R. E
Page 161 and 162: [235]. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J.
Page 163 and 164: [272]. Sjöberg, L., Littorin, P.,
Page 165 and 166: Bilaga 1. Kriterie- och bakgrundsfr
Page 167 and 168: 29. Beskriver företaget på ett f
Page 169 and 170: Bilaga 2. Skalornas psykometriska e
Page 171 and 172: Tabell 6.1. Grundläggande data fö
Page 173 and 174: Tabell 7.1. Grundläggande data fö
Page 175 and 176: Tabell 8. 5. Skalornas reliabilitet
Page 177 and 178: Tabell 8. 8. Könsskillnader, Studi
Page 179 and 180: Tabell 8. 10. Medelvärden i person
Page 181 and 182: Tabell 13.2. Resultat av analyser a
Page 183 and 184: Bilaga 3. Ipsativa och normativa fo
Page 185 and 186: Figur 2 visar en mycket stor förde
Page 187 and 188: formatet är känsligt för ”faki
Page 189 and 190: Bilaga 4. Exempel på utlåtanden s
Page 191 and 192: Hon är ganska intresserad av att a
Page 193 and 194: taget goda erfarenheter av dem. Hon
Page 195: 195
show all

Bortom_Big_Five_28_nov_noc _pm_metod.pdf - Från One.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?