En receptionsstudie om spelfilm, filmpublik och ... - Anpere
En receptionsstudie om spelfilm, filmpublik och ... - Anpere En receptionsstudie om spelfilm, filmpublik och ... - Anpere
Religious Change Secondly, I discuss religious change from a starting point in theoretical perspectives from the sociology of religion, where questions are asked about religious change in late modern society with different characteristics in various parts of the world. The American situation has its own peculiar traits with reasonably high levels of religious commitment (Bellah & Madsen et al. 1985, Roof 1999, Norris & Inglehart 2004). The European setting is different from this, displaying fewer obviously religious characteristics (Gill, D’Costa & King 1994, Woodhead, Heelas & Martin 2001, Davie 2002). The question of a more detraditionalized European situation is addressed, as well as slow shifts in late modern society towards weakened religious traditions, more individualized belief systems and a sacralisation of the self (Woodhead & Heelas 2000, Ahlin 2005, Sjöborg 2006). The question asked from this perspective is what kind of role media plays as a resource for shaping people’s personal worldviews. In this context I have defined what is considered to be an existential matter. These topics have been empirically investigated by a certain branch of scholars in Systematic Theology studying worldviews. It is difficult to find an adequate English term with which to translate the term – ‘livsåskådning’ – used among Swedish scholars, but a number of suggestions have been posited such as ‘worldviews’ or ‘life philosophy’ or ‘view of life’ (Morhed 2000). A view of life consists of a cognitive element encompassing the individual’s theoretical assumptions and comprehensive views about the world, an evaluative element with personal central values and finally a personal basic mood (Jeffner 1976). There are, on the one hand, examples of vague and abstract definitions of what is considered to be an existential matter addressing the profound questions of why we live, why we die and what the purpose of life is (Hartman & Pettersson 1980). On the other hand there are quite detailed definitions listing many topics such as race, sex, love, suffering, loneliness, freedom, human conflict, life and death, guilt, responsibility, human dignity, euthanasia and abortion (Ronnås 1969). I have revised 15 topics formulated by Bråkenhielm (2001), to create 10 defined existential matters to make use of in my analysis of thirteen individual interviews; 1, why we live and die; 2, purpose and meaning in life; 3, guilt and responsibility; 4, what is reality?; 5, what is a human being?; 6, what is love?; 7, the existence of God; 8, what is right?; 9, good and evil; 10, moral principles. Film Studies – Sujet and Fabula Third, I point to the notions used in film studies to distinguish between ‘sujet’ and ‘fabula’. This distinction highlights the hugely important recognition that spectators actively make meaning. We, as audience, create the fabula in our minds, fleshing out the plot to form the full story on the basis of cues in 238
the sujet (Bordwell & Thompson 1997). Bordwell (1985), states that whether called perceptual or cognitive, organized clusters of knowledge guide our hypothesis making in film viewing based on cues of sound, light, editing, camera angles and so forth in the sujet. The total fable is constructed through the basis of different schemata or cognitive maps, where the film’s sujet and style interact in the course of cueing and channelling the spectator’s construction of the fabula (Bordwell 1985). In his thesis the Swedish film scholar Per Persson argued that this approach should be tested empirically on what is going on when individuals watch films and how the viewer’s everyday life works as a cognitive background for inferences and construction of the fabula (Persson 2000). This does not come out of the blue, but relies on a wide range of basic assumptions and personal knowledge and “as an active perceiver, the spectator is constantly testing the work for a larger significance, for what it says or suggests” (Bordwell & Thompson 1997: 73). Within film studies not enough has been done with empirical ambitions to address how these processes could be understood (Persson 2000). Socio-Cognitive Theory Fourth, I frame the question about individuals’ personal beliefs within a theoretical paradigm of socio-cognitive structures of representations. Here cognitive psychology is developed in a social psychological direction. It is used to discuss cultural discourses and how they are comprehended and treated by individual subjects as a cognitive process in particular situations (Cole 1996, Hagen 1998, Höijer 1998c). Socio-cognitive theory brings forth a more nuanced comprehension of “how ordinary people create and use meaning to make sense of the world” (Augoustinous & Walker: 141). Within cognitive psychology I have adopted a theoretical perspective derived from schema-theory to make use of as an analytical tool for detecting meaning making processes in the dynamics of the mind. As an audience researcher I have tried to “identify what could be described as more general mental/cognitive frames or schemata involved in the process of media consumption” (Eriksson 2006: 41). I am following Birgitta Höijer’s approach by identifying interplay between culture and cognition in three contexts; 1, a socio-historic process, 2, a socio-cultural interaction with the world and 3, inner psychological processes (Höijer 1998c: 169). A Theoretical Tool Finally, I developed a theoretical model as a tool with which to analyse my interviews. For these interviews thirteen spectators chose their favourite film of all time and discussed its emotional and cognitive impact from their point of view. I adopted schema theory, inspired by Höijer’s use of six main schema-categories as basic cognitive structures through which people com- 239
- Page 188 and 189: akut situation. Samtalet med henne
- Page 190 and 191: Fråga 2: Tolkningsschema Genom vil
- Page 192 and 193: Tabell 35. Peters profil Existentie
- Page 194 and 195: Maria hade en välutvecklad medvete
- Page 196 and 197: hon tyckt och tänkt tidigare och v
- Page 198 and 199: Tabell 37. Respondenternas favoritf
- Page 200 and 201: närmast linjärt med graden av rel
- Page 202 and 203: mat då åtta av tretton respondent
- Page 204 and 205: Kritisk mot viss filmvetenskaplig t
- Page 206 and 207: själv och sina existentiella fråg
- Page 208 and 209: teman fanns med i samtalet om Fight
- Page 210 and 211: ande kyrkans belastade historia bet
- Page 212 and 213: Vilka existentiella frågor aktiver
- Page 214 and 215: KAPITEL 6 - RESULTAT I detta kapite
- Page 216 and 217: av enkätsvaren pekade på att en t
- Page 218 and 219: Fokusgruppintervjun har givit lite
- Page 220 and 221: Utöver att ge en del svar på huvu
- Page 222 and 223: Den frihet med vilken respondentern
- Page 224 and 225: 7.2.2. Centrala föreställningar e
- Page 226 and 227: De meningsskapande processer jag pr
- Page 228 and 229: 1997: 13). Olika forskare inom det
- Page 230 and 231: 230 [W]e claim that a more specific
- Page 232 and 233: 7.4. Tillbaka till utgångspunkten
- Page 234 and 235: För det tredje har jag komplettera
- Page 236 and 237: My aim as a sociologist of religion
- Page 240 and 241: prehend fiction narratives. They ar
- Page 242 and 243: 8.5. Interviews - focus-groups and
- Page 244 and 245: essed this mainly through story sch
- Page 246 and 247: individual purpose in life and the
- Page 248 and 249: Författarens tack Vid teologen i U
- Page 250 and 251: Tack till er som med gemensamma kra
- Page 252 and 253: Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard,
- Page 254 and 255: Fraser, Peter (1998). Images of the
- Page 256 and 257: Citizen Discourses. Theoretical and
- Page 258 and 259: Maia, Rousiley Celi Moriera (2001).
- Page 260 and 261: Ribrant, Gunnar (2006). “High-Tec
- Page 262 and 263: Thompson, John B. (1995). The Media
- Page 264 and 265: BILAGOR Enkät 86 264 Film och reli
- Page 266 and 267: Fråga 7: Film är underhållning.
- Page 268 and 269: Om ja, dvs, stämmer ganska bra ell
- Page 270 and 271: ( _ ) Någon annan kristen rörelse
- Page 272 and 273: ( _ ) Ungefär någon gång om åre
- Page 274 and 275: Fråga 50: I mitt barndomshem talad
- Page 276 and 277: INDEX Person- och sakregister abduk
- Page 278 and 279: Junus, Petra, 21, 256 Jörgensen, M
- Page 280 and 281: Sjöborg, Anders, 21, 25, 26, 32, 3
- Page 282 and 283: ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Psyc
- Page 284: SKRIFTER OM KULTUR OCH MEDIER HÖGS
Religious Change<br />
Secondly, I discuss religious change fr<strong>om</strong> a starting point in theoretical perspectives<br />
fr<strong>om</strong> the sociology of religion, where questions are asked about<br />
religious change in late modern society with different characteristics in<br />
various parts of the world. The American situation has its own peculiar traits<br />
with reasonably high levels of religious c<strong>om</strong>mitment (Bellah & Madsen et<br />
al. 1985, Roof 1999, Norris & Inglehart 2004). The European setting is different<br />
fr<strong>om</strong> this, displaying fewer obviously religious characteristics (Gill,<br />
D’Costa & King 1994, Woodhead, Heelas & Martin 2001, Davie 2002). The<br />
question of a more detraditionalized European situation is addressed, as well<br />
as slow shifts in late modern society towards weakened religious traditions,<br />
more individualized belief systems and a sacralisation of the self (Woodhead<br />
& Heelas 2000, Ahlin 2005, Sjöborg 2006). The question asked fr<strong>om</strong> this<br />
perspective is what kind of role media plays as a resource for shaping people’s<br />
personal worldviews.<br />
In this context I have defined what is considered to be an existential matter.<br />
These topics have been empirically investigated by a certain branch of<br />
scholars in Systematic Theology studying worldviews. It is difficult to find<br />
an adequate <strong>En</strong>glish term with which to translate the term – ‘livsåskådning’<br />
– used among Swedish scholars, but a number of suggestions have been<br />
posited such as ‘worldviews’ or ‘life philosophy’ or ‘view of life’ (Morhed<br />
2000). A view of life consists of a cognitive element enc<strong>om</strong>passing the individual’s<br />
theoretical assumptions and c<strong>om</strong>prehensive views about the world,<br />
an evaluative element with personal central values and finally a personal<br />
basic mood (Jeffner 1976).<br />
There are, on the one hand, examples of vague and abstract definitions of<br />
what is considered to be an existential matter addressing the profound questions<br />
of why we live, why we die and what the purpose of life is (Hartman &<br />
Pettersson 1980). On the other hand there are quite detailed definitions listing<br />
many topics such as race, sex, love, suffering, loneliness, freed<strong>om</strong>, human<br />
conflict, life and death, guilt, responsibility, human dignity, euthanasia<br />
and abortion (Ronnås 1969).<br />
I have revised 15 topics formulated by Bråkenhielm (2001), to create 10<br />
defined existential matters to make use of in my analysis of thirteen individual<br />
interviews; 1, why we live and die; 2, purpose and meaning in life; 3,<br />
guilt and responsibility; 4, what is reality?; 5, what is a human being?; 6,<br />
what is love?; 7, the existence of God; 8, what is right?; 9, good and evil; 10,<br />
moral principles.<br />
Film Studies – Sujet and Fabula<br />
Third, I point to the notions used in film studies to distinguish between ‘sujet’<br />
and ‘fabula’. This distinction highlights the hugely important recognition<br />
that spectators actively make meaning. We, as audience, create the fabula in<br />
our minds, fleshing out the plot to form the full story on the basis of cues in<br />
238