cykelvägars drift-och underhållsstandard –kommunenkät - VTI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

olyckor och om cyklisternas önskemål och värderingar av komfort, restidförluster, etc., samt kännedom om var i cykelvägnätet särskilda problemställen förekommer. Förutom god kunskap om systemet, gör noggrann planering och lång framförhållning att det går att spara på kostnaderna. 6 VTI rapport 558
Maintenance service levels of cycleways. Interviews with 13 Swedish municipalities with relatively high amount of bicycle traffic. by Anna Niska VTI (Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute) SE-581 95 Linköping Sweden Summary This study gives an insight into the routines and regulations for cycleway maintenance in Swedish municipalities with relatively high amount of bicycle traffic. The study is part of a larger project “Service levels of cycleways” with the purpose of finding the characteristics of an attractive cycleway, and specifying how to maintain cycleways in order to promote cycling. The study is based on interviews with employees in 13 Swedish municipalities supplemented with relevant documentation provided by them. In general, for cycleway construction, Swedish municipalities follow the technical description of road constructions from the Swedish Road Administration (SRA). However, for maintenance and operation of cycle ways, the municipalities have their own requirements. The local conditions are considered to vary to a degree demanding specific requirements for each municipality. Usually, budget restraints are determining maintenance requirements and when measures are taken. In a majority of the municipalities interviewed, cycle ways are given priority and are maintained at the highest service level. Maintenance measures are performed by the municipalities them selves or by contractors. Thawing and freezing, resulting in slush followed, alternately, by icy ruts and slipperiness, is considered to be the most difficult condition to handle in cycleway maintenance. Providing good quality surfaces in view of cyclists’ sensitivity to even minor defects, is also considered to be difficult. Many of the interviewed emphasized that limited means is the largest problem making it increasingly difficult to provide a high maintenance service level. In general, cycleway surface conditions are monitored through visual inspections only. The public is considered to be an important resource in detecting and reporting potholes, cracks and other cycleway defects, and the municipalities systematically register remarks from the public. The most common complaints from the public concerning cycleway maintenance, regard broken glass or slipperiness. Other concerns are also reflected such as requests for new cycle paths, unclear traffic regulations and traffic behaviour where different groups of road-users are complaining about the behaviour of others. A continuous cycleway network separated from car traffic and a high maintenance service level are considered to be the most important measures in order to promote cycling and simultaneously improve cycling safety. It is also considered important to raise the status of the bicycle as a means of transport, to elucidate traffic regulations including cyclists, and to increase the respect among road-users. It is the overall resolution combining several measures that is important when improving the situation of cyclists. It is important to support the municipal road administrators with cost-benefit arguments presenting the total cost of bicycle accidents, travelling time, etc., in order to get funding for maintenance measures. On the other hand, it is possible to improve the VTI rapport 558 7
Page 1: VTI rapport 558 Utgivningsår 2006
Page 4 and 5: Publisher: Publication: VTI rapport
Page 6 and 7: Kvalitetsgranskning Intern peer rev
Page 8 and 9: Kristianstad.......................
Page 12 and 13: maintenance service level with limi
Page 14 and 15: 1.2 Syfte Syftet med denna studie
Page 16 and 17: 2 Metod Innehållet i denna rapport
Page 18 and 19: 3.4 Upphandling av entreprenörer 3
Page 20 and 21: 4 Standardkrav och riktlinjer 4.1 A
Page 22 and 23: Umeå och Örebro nämner att de of
Page 24 and 25: 4.4 Vinterdrift 4.4.1 Standardkrav
Page 26 and 27: 4.4.2 Omhändertagande av vintersan
Page 28 and 29: Flera av de intervjuade framhåller
Page 30 and 31: 6 Egna studier och uppföljningar 6
Page 32 and 33: årliga sammanställningar av de in
Page 34 and 35: av brister i vägytan. Enligt Malm
Page 36 and 37: 7 Planerade åtgärder för en öka
Page 38 and 39: 8 Längder och kostnader 8.1 Längd
Page 40 and 41: Tabell 8 Årliga genomsnittskostnad
Page 42 and 43: person- och organisationsberoende o
Page 44 and 45: för drift och underhåll, etc. Det
Page 46 and 47: 42 VTI rapport 558
Page 48 and 49: Bilaga 1 Sid 2 (8) Vilken ersättni
Page 50 and 51: Bilaga 1 Sid 4 (8) Anser du att de
Page 52 and 53: Bilaga 1 Sid 6 (8) Har eventuella b
Page 54 and 55: Bilaga 1 Sid 8 (8) 6. LÄNGDER OCH
Page 56 and 57: Bilaga 2 Sid 2 (99) VTI rapport 558
Page 58 and 59: Bilaga 2 Sid 4 (99) Hur kontrollera
Page 60 and 61:
Bilaga 2 Sid 6 (99) Finns statistik
Page 62 and 63:
Bilaga 2 Sid 8 (99) Under åren 200
Page 64 and 65:
Bilaga 2 - Gävle Sid 10 (99) ett h
Page 66 and 67:
Bilaga 2 - Gävle Sid 12 (99) Glask
Page 68 and 69:
Bilaga 2 - Gävle Sid 14 (99) Hur v
Page 70 and 71:
Bilaga 2 - Gävle Sid 16 (99) VTI r
Page 72 and 73:
Bilaga 2 - Göteborg Sid 18 (99) me
Page 74 and 75:
Bilaga 2 - Göteborg Sid 20 (99) Vi
Page 76 and 77:
Bilaga 2 - Göteborg Sid 22 (99) Ha
Page 78 and 79:
Bilaga 2 - Göteborg Sid 24 (99) Mi
Page 80 and 81:
Bilaga 2 - Helsingborg Sid 26 (99)
Page 82 and 83:
3. Samarbete/utbyte av erfarenheter
Page 84 and 85:
Bilaga 2 - Helsingborg Sid 30 (99)
Page 86 and 87:
Bilaga 2 - Kristianstad Sid 32 (99)
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Bilaga 2 - Linköping Sid 38 (99) b
Page 94 and 95:
Bilaga 2 - Linköping Sid 40 (99) E
Page 96 and 97:
Bilaga 2 - Linköping Sid 42 (99) O
Page 98 and 99:
Bilaga 2 - Linköping Sid 44 (99) I
Page 100 and 101:
Bilaga 2 - Linköping Sid 46 (99) V
Page 102 and 103:
Bilaga 2 - Luleå Sid 48 (99) entre
Page 104 and 105:
Bilaga 2 - Luleå Sid 50 (99) Däre
Page 106 and 107:
Bilaga 2 - Luleå Sid 52 (99) för
Page 108 and 109:
Bilaga 2 - Lund Sid 54 (99) Det är
Page 110 and 111:
Bilaga 2 - Lund Sid 56 (99) Anser d
Page 112 and 113:
Bilaga 2 - Lund Sid 58 (99) I andra
Page 114 and 115:
VTI rapport 558
Page 116 and 117:
Bilaga 2 - Malmö Sid 62 (99) 2. St
Page 118 and 119:
3. Samarbete/utbyte av erfarenheter
Page 120 and 121:
Bilaga 2 - Malmö Sid 66 (99) I kon
Page 122 and 123:
VTI rapport 558
Page 124 and 125:
Bilaga 2 - Umeå Sid 70 (99) att de
Page 126 and 127:
Bilaga 2 - Umeå Sid 72 (99) Enligt
Page 128 and 129:
Bilaga 2 - Umeå Sid 74 (99) Tycker
Page 130 and 131:
Bilaga 2 - Umeå Sid 76 (99) utför
Page 132 and 133:
VTI rapport 558
Page 134 and 135:
Bilaga 2 - Västerås Sid 80 (99) f
Page 136 and 137:
Bilaga 2 - Västerås Sid 82 (99) E
Page 138 and 139:
Bilaga 2 - Västerås Sid 84 (99) H
Page 140 and 141:
Bilaga 2 - Västerås Sid 86 (99) V
Page 142 and 143:
Bilaga 2 - Växjö Sid 88 (99) Anse
Page 144 and 145:
Bilaga 2 - Växjö Sid 90 (99) Vilk
Page 146 and 147:
Bilaga 2 - Örebro Sid 92 (99) Vint
Page 148 and 149:
Bilaga 2 - Örebro Sid 94 (99) så
Page 150 and 151:
Bilaga 2 - Örebro Sid 96 (99) rela
Page 152 and 153:
Bilaga 2 - Örebro Sid 98 (99) 5. P
Page 154:
VTI är ett oberoende och internati
show all

cykelvägars drift-och underhållsstandard –kommunenkät - VTI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?