Rapport mars 2002, Om Internet och marknader i förändring.

92
Gourlay, A.R. och E.J. Pentecost (2000) “The determinants of
technology diffusion: Evidence from the UK financial sector.”
Economic Research Paper No. 00/9. Department of Economics,
Loughborough University.
Götz, G. (1999) “Monopolistic Competition and the Diffusion of
New Technology“ RAND Journal of Economics, 30(4), sid. 679-93.
Hannan, T. och J. McDowell (1984) “The determinants of
technology adoption: The case of the banking firm.” Rand Journal
of Economics. 15, sid. 328-335.
Hicks, J. (1935) “Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of
monopoly.” Econometrica. 3, sid. 1-20.
Hoppe, H.C. (2000) “Second-Mover Advantages in the Strategic
Adoption of New Technology under Uncertainty“ International
Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(2), sid. 315-38.
“Internetindikatorn 2:a kvartalet 2001.” (2001) Stockholm: Svensk
Handel.
Kamien, M.I. och N.L. Schwartz (1994) Market structure and
innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, M.L. och C. Shapiro (1985) “Network Externalities,
Competition and Compatibility.” American Economic Review. 75,
sid. 424-440.
Katz, M.L. och C. Shapiro (1986a) “Technology adoption in the
presence of network externalities.” Journal of Political Economy.
94, sid. 822-841.
Katz, M.L. och C. Shapiro (1986b) “Product compatibility choice in
a market with technological progress.” Oxford Economic Papers.
38, sid. 146-165.
Katz, M.L. och C. Shapiro (1994) “Systems Competition and
Network Effects“ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2),
sid. 93-115.
Klein, B. (2001) “The Microsoft case: What can a dominant firm do
to defend its market position?“ Journal of Economic Perspective,
15(2), sid. 45-62.
Konkurrensen i Sverige under 90-talet - problem och förslag.
Konkurrensverkets rapportserie 2000:1, Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.’