Rapport mars 2002, Om Internet och marknader i förändring.

Referenser
Ahlborn, C., D. S. Evans och A. J. Padilla (2001) ”Competition
Policy in the New Economy: Is European Competition Law up to
the Challenge?” European Competition Law Review. ff. 156-167.
Andersson, P. (red.), (2001), Den nya juridiken? Svenskt Näringsliv
Audretsch, D. B., W. J. Baumol och A. E. Burke (2001)
”Competition Policy in Dynamic Markets” International Journal of
Industrial Organization, ff.613-34.
Balto, D. och R. Pitofsky (1998) ”Antitrust and high-tech
industries: the new challenge” Antitrust Bulletin, ff. 583-607.
Baumol, W. J. (2001) ”When is interfirm coordination beneficial?
The case of innovation. International Journal of Industrial
Organization, ff. 665-693.
Bergman, M. (2001) ”The role of the essential facilities doctrine”
paper presented at Helsinki conference on Antitrust Issues in
Network Industries, August 3-4 th .
Carlsson, K., E. Söderlind och M. Ulriksson (1999)
Konkurrenslagen Norstedts Gula bibliotek, Stockholm.
Carstensen, P. C. (1999) ”Remedying the microsoft monopoly:
monopoly law, the rights of buyers, and the enclosure movement in
intellectual property” The Antitrust Bulletin. ff. 577-617.
Coase, R. (1972) ”Durability and Monopoly” Journal of Law and
Economics ff.143-149.
Cotter, T. F. (1999) ”Intellectual property and the essential facilities
doctrine” The Antitrust Bulletin. ff. 211-250.
Eizner, J. R. (1998) Innovation Markets and Automatic
Transmissions: a shift in the wrong direction?” Antitrust Bulletin,
ff. 297-349.
Katz, M. L. och C. Shapiro (1998) ”Antitrust in Software Markets”
i Eisenach, J. A. och T. M. Lenard red. Competition, innovation and
the microsoft monopoly: Antitrust in the digital marketplace
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Konkurrensverket (2001a) Konkurrensreglerna
177