Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet
Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet
MCLEOD, J. & YATES,L. (forthcoming 1997) ’Can we find out about girls and boys today - or must we settle for just talking about ourselves? Dilemmas of a feminist, qualitative, longitudinal research project’, Australian Educational Researcher. MAC AN GHAILL, M. (1996) ’Sociology of education, state schooling and social class: beyond critiques of the New Right hegemony’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17 (2), 163-176. REAY,D. (1996) ’Dealing with difficult differences: reflexivity and social class in feminist research’, Feminism and Psychology, 6 (3), 443-456. SKEGGS,.B (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: becoming respectable. (London, Sage). TEESE, R., DAVIES,M., CHARLTON,M. & POLESEL,J. (1995) Who wins at school? Girls and boys in Australian secondary education. (Melbourne University Dept of Education Policy and Management.) WALKERDINE, V. & LUCEY,H. (1989) Democracy in the Kitchen: regulating mothers and socialising daughters. (London, Virago). WATSON,I. (1993) ’Education, class and culture: the Birmingham ethnographic tradition and the problem of the new middle class’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14 (2), 179-197. WYN, J. (1997) ‘Transition and young women’, unpublished paper presented to La Trobe University faculty seminar. YATES,L. (1997a) ’Gender equity and the boys debate: what sort of challenge is it?’ British Journal of sociology of Education, 18 (3), 337-347. YATES, L. (1997b) ’Review of Education, Assessment and Society’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (3), 435-439. YATES, L. & LEDER,G.C. (1996) Student Pathways: a review and overview of national databases on gender equity. (Canberra, ACT Dept of Education and Training). YATES,L. & MCLEOD,J. (1996) ’”And how would you describe yourself?” Researchers and researched in the first stages of a longitudinal, qualitative research study’, Australian Journal of Education 40 (1), 88-103. 67
- Page 13 and 14: 16 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 15 and 16: 18 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 17 and 18: Professionella samtal 20 Fyra insti
- Page 19 and 20: 22 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 21 and 22: Institutionsövergripande arbete Pe
- Page 23 and 24: 26 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 25 and 26: 28 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 27 and 28: 30 Institutionen för matematik och
- Page 29 and 30: 32 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 31 and 32: 34 Institutionen för svenska och s
- Page 33 and 34: 36 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 35 and 36: 38 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 37 and 38: 40 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 39 and 40: 42 Fyra institutioner och en utveck
- Page 41 and 42: Samarbete med skolan 44 Fyra instit
- Page 43 and 44: Slutord Läromedelsframställning F
- Page 46 and 47: In the brave new world In the field
- Page 48 and 49: In the brave new world ment of iden
- Page 50 and 51: In the brave new world For example,
- Page 52 and 53: In the brave new world of the other
- Page 54 and 55: In the brave new world siderable dr
- Page 56 and 57: In the brave new world L: Yeah, the
- Page 58 and 59: In the brave new world middle-class
- Page 60 and 61: In the brave new world The school e
- Page 62 and 63: In the brave new world Again at thi
- Page 66 and 67: Recensioner Didaktikens carpe diem
- Page 68 and 69: Recension kursplanerna i allt väse
- Page 70 and 71: Recension av kreativitet och fantas
- Page 72 and 73: Recension Barn i skola och fritidsh
- Page 74 and 75: Recension fritidshem, när det gäl
- Page 76 and 77: Recension Det viktigaste är dock a
- Page 78 and 79: Recension Den forskning som ändå
- Page 80 and 81: Recension skola. Drygt två tredjed
- Page 82 and 83: Recension tureras, tolkas, analyser
- Page 84 and 85: hjälp med både struktur och förk
- Page 86 and 87: Författare Birgit Andersson, univ
- Page 88 and 89: i tyska skolor. Preliminära result
- Page 90 and 91: Ulla Johansson: Education and State
- Page 92: Tidskrift INNEHÅLL Redaktionellt A
MCLEOD, J. & YATES,L. (forthcoming 1997)<br />
’Can we find out about girls and boys today - or must<br />
we settle for just talking about ourselves? Dilemmas<br />
of a feminist, qualitative, longitudinal research project’,<br />
Australian Educational Researcher.<br />
MAC AN GHAILL, M. (1996)<br />
’Sociology of education, state schooling and social<br />
class: beyond critiques of the New Right hegemony’,<br />
British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17 (2), 163-176.<br />
REAY,D. (1996)<br />
’Dealing with difficult differences: reflexivity and social<br />
class in feminist research’, Feminism and Psychology,<br />
6 (3), 443-456.<br />
SKEGGS,.B (1997)<br />
Formations of Class and Gender: becoming respectable.<br />
(London, Sage).<br />
TEESE, R., DAVIES,M., CHARLTON,M. &<br />
POLESEL,J. (1995)<br />
Who wins at school? Girls and boys in Australian<br />
secondary education. (Melbourne University<br />
Dept of Education Policy and Management.)<br />
WALKERDINE, V. & LUCEY,H. (1989)<br />
Democracy in the Kitchen: regulating mothers and<br />
socialising daughters. (London, Virago).<br />
WATSON,I. (1993)<br />
’Education, class and culture: the Birmingham<br />
ethnographic tradition and the problem of the new<br />
middle class’, British Journal of Sociology of Education,<br />
14 (2), 179-197.<br />
WYN, J. (1997)<br />
‘Transition and young women’, unpublished paper<br />
presented to La Trobe University faculty seminar.<br />
YATES,L. (1997a)<br />
’Gender equity and the boys debate: what sort of<br />
challenge is it?’ British Journal of sociology of Education,<br />
18 (3), 337-347.<br />
YATES, L. (1997b)<br />
’Review of Education, Assessment and Society’, British<br />
Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (3), 435-439.<br />
YATES, L. & LEDER,G.C. (1996)<br />
Student Pathways: a review and overview of national<br />
databases on gender equity. (Canberra, ACT<br />
Dept of Education and Training).<br />
YATES,L. & MCLEOD,J. (1996)<br />
’”And how would you describe yourself?” Researchers<br />
and researched in the first stages of a longitudinal,<br />
qualitative research study’, Australian Journal of<br />
Education 40 (1), 88-103.<br />
67