Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet
Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet
Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In the brave new world<br />
of the other schools. Through our close exposure<br />
to individuals over time, we can think, heuristically<br />
at least, about what effects particular schools<br />
are having both ge<strong>ner</strong>ally and on particular types<br />
of students.<br />
2. Having to theorize ’class’ processes or categories<br />
from students’ subjectivities.<br />
Although a limitation of our study is that<br />
we are working only with what students tell us<br />
in interviews, this might also be seen as a virtue.<br />
Rather than having their ’class’ pre-categorized,<br />
we have to try to understand what their particular<br />
location (economic, family, cultural capital,<br />
etc) actually means to them, and how it is<br />
working for them as they go through school.<br />
(Here, we are of course drawing on and in dialogue<br />
with the existing literature on these issues.)<br />
Students begin secondary school with different<br />
family-based knowledge and resources,<br />
and this was reflected in some of the answers<br />
students gave about what they might do in the<br />
future (be a ’barrister’ as compared with ’get a<br />
job’), or how they spent their time out of school<br />
(’We used to have a computer, but it broke, so I<br />
just go down to my friend’s house and play her<br />
Sega’); and they differ in how articulate they are,<br />
and how self-confident in their interactions with<br />
adults such as teachers and researchers (Yates and<br />
McLeod, 1996; McLeod and Yates, 1997). What<br />
do schools (and different schools) do in interaction<br />
with these differences? In year 7 we were<br />
interested in asking students about how they saw<br />
their school; what they thought it valued; what<br />
they thought of the opportunities it gave them.<br />
The answers certainly begin to undermine any<br />
crude ’school effectiveness’ idea that school<br />
effects are simply an outcome of what the school<br />
does organisationally or pedagogically.<br />
In terms of curriculum, for example, we<br />
found in year 7 that across all four schools the<br />
students tended to be rather bored with the<br />
academic subjects they had done before, and<br />
enthusiastic about new subjects which had a<br />
practical skills component. Of the schools in our<br />
study, the school that had the largest range of<br />
such subjects, and was best equipped here, was<br />
Blacktown Secondary 14 , the school that would<br />
ge<strong>ner</strong>ally be described as the most disadvantaged<br />
of the four in our study. When they were asked<br />
to talk about specific subjects, the students at<br />
this school were notably more enthusiastic than<br />
the students at the other schools, whereas the<br />
students at the private school took no technical<br />
subjects other than one period a week of computer<br />
55<br />
Vignettes from<br />
work in progress:<br />
Interactions of class<br />
and schooling:<br />
What school does,<br />
compared with how<br />
it is positioned.