29.07.2013 Views

Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet

Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet

Ladda ner utgåvan. - Fakultet för lärarutbildning - Umeå universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The 12 to 18<br />

Project 13<br />

54<br />

In the brave new world<br />

questions about what is ’class’ in the contemporary<br />

economy. We can talk about class being gendered,<br />

or about gender taking classed forms, but we<br />

need to think about both the specificity of different<br />

groups, and also about what patterns and<br />

processes of power, privilege, disadvantage etc<br />

are being produced and recast here.<br />

The 12 to 18 Project was begun in 1993, and<br />

is investigating boys and girls at four different<br />

schools as they proceed through each year of<br />

their secondary schooling. We interview the students<br />

twice a year (and video-tape that), sometimes<br />

with friends, and are thus building up both<br />

a cross-sectional view of students at a particular<br />

age, as well as longitudinal evidence on how<br />

students with particular social characteristics and<br />

in particular schools change over time. There is<br />

no perfect study, and no one way to address the<br />

problems I’ve outlined above. In our study we<br />

do not observe the students in class or out of<br />

school; and we have information about their<br />

background and families only through what they<br />

tell us (see Yates and McLeod, 1996; McLeod<br />

and Yates, 1997). However, the study is set up<br />

to attempt to have some regard to the types of<br />

issues I have outlined.<br />

1. The selection of four schools and the ongoing<br />

comparative focus.<br />

In designing the study, we needed the scale to<br />

be sufficiently small for Julie and I to do all the<br />

interviews; but we were concerned about problems<br />

I have identified earlier: of focussing only<br />

on extremes; of conflating class and school; of<br />

taking a particular sub-group as archetypal of<br />

all. We therefore decided to base the ongoing<br />

study in four schools two of which do represent<br />

’extremes’ to some extent (an elite private school;<br />

and a technical school located in a poor area);<br />

but two of which are ’middle’ high schools,<br />

which draw on students from a range of backgrounds,<br />

and which do not preclude some<br />

students at least from being conventionally<br />

successful. Moreover, in terms of the students<br />

in our study, not all the students at the elite<br />

school are from a highly advantaged background<br />

(one has a father who teaches there, and lives in<br />

a distant and poorer part of the city); nor all the<br />

students at the ex-technical school from high<br />

disadvantage (one has a father who is an engineer,<br />

and has travelled overseas). Two of the schools are<br />

located in Melbourne, and two in a provincial<br />

city, enabling some differentiation in our study<br />

of how particular occupational and family<br />

backgrounds (categories) are worked out in<br />

practice and in particular contexts. All four of<br />

the school cohorts include at least one or two<br />

students who might potentially have gone to one

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!