03.07.2013 Views

Reliabilitet och validitet hos Acceptance Symptom Assessment Scale

Reliabilitet och validitet hos Acceptance Symptom Assessment Scale

Reliabilitet och validitet hos Acceptance Symptom Assessment Scale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ludington, E., & Dester, F. (1998). Statistical analysis of total labor pain using the visual<br />

analog scale and application to studies of analgesic effectiveness during childbirth.<br />

Anesthesia & Analgesia, 87 (3), 723-727.<br />

Lundeberg, T., Lund, I., Dahlin, L., Borg, E., Gustafsson, C., & Sandin, L., et.al. (2001).<br />

Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessements. Journal of<br />

Rehabilitation Medicine, 33, 279-283.<br />

Lundeberg, T., & Norrbrink, C. (2010). Om smärta - ett fysiologiskt perspektiv. Lund:<br />

Studentlitteratur AB.<br />

Matamalas, A., Ramírez, M., Mojal, S., García De Frutos, A., Molina, A., Saló, G.,<br />

Llado, A., & Cáceres, E. (2010). The Visual <strong>Scale</strong> and a Five-Item Verbal Rating <strong>Scale</strong><br />

Are Not Interchangeable for Back Pain <strong>Assessment</strong> in Lumbar Spine Disorders. Spine, 35,<br />

(21), 1115-1119. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.<br />

Melzack, R., & Katz, J. (1992). The McGill Pain Questionnere: Appraisal and Current<br />

Status. In Turk, D.C., & Melzack, R. Handbook of pain assessment. Second edition. New<br />

York: The Guilford press.<br />

Moore, S. (1997). Understanding Pain and its Relief in Labour. Pearson Professional<br />

Limited.<br />

Myles, P.S., & Urquhart, N. (2005). The linearity of the visual analogue scale in patients<br />

with severe acute pain. Anaesth intensive care, 33 (1), 54-58.<br />

Mårtensson, L., Stener- Victorin, E., & Wallin, G. (2008). Acupuncture versus<br />

subcutaneous injections of steril water as treatment for labour pain. Acta Obstetrica et<br />

Gynecologia Scandinavica, 87 (2), 171-177.<br />

Medicinska forskningsrådet (1996). MFR-rapport 2. Riktlinjer för etisk värdering av<br />

medicinsk humanforskning. Stockholm: Medicinska forskningsrådet.<br />

Nakamura, Y., & Chapman C.R. (2002). Measuring pain: an introspective look at<br />

introspection. Consciousness and Cognition, 11 (4), 582-592.<br />

Neuman L.W. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.<br />

Vol. Third edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.<br />

Nizard, J., Haberman, S., Paltieli, Y., Gonen, R., Ohel, G., Nicholson, D., & Ville, Y.<br />

(2009). How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal<br />

examination with spatial position-tracking ruler. American Journal of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynecology, 200, 402.e1-402.e4.<br />

Northern Nurses Federation (NNF). (2003). Etiska riktlinjer för omvårdnadsforskning i<br />

Norden: Hämtad på: http://www.sykepleien.no/ikbViewer/Content/337889/SSN<br />

s%20etiske%retningslinjer.pdf, 2010-10-11.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!