04.04.2013 Views

NORNA-RAPPORTER 88 Binamn. Uppkomst, bildning, terminologi ...

NORNA-RAPPORTER 88 Binamn. Uppkomst, bildning, terminologi ...

NORNA-RAPPORTER 88 Binamn. Uppkomst, bildning, terminologi ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Coming to grips with the multifacetedness of bynames 45<br />

(11) classification of names,<br />

(12) statistical onomastics and<br />

(13) lexicography of names.<br />

This selection of onomastic subdisciplines illustrates that onomastics, including<br />

the study of bynames, has not only the potential to meet challenges in collaboration<br />

with other disciplines but also to embrace a holistic approach.<br />

4. Which is the most essential facet?<br />

In view of the multifacetedness of bynames, the question arises which of the<br />

facets is the most essential. The answer, which complies with my third thesis,<br />

is simple if somewhat unsurprising – none. Integrated with the whole, each facet<br />

of the gem is important and interesting. A particular facet of the gem can,<br />

however, be the most essential one to look at for one’s present purposes. Looking<br />

at one facet after the other is as valid an approach as looking at the whole<br />

gem.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

What does all that come down to? – The multifacetedness of bynames can<br />

neither be taken for granted nor as given. That is the reason why I have suggested<br />

that studying bynames is like gem cutting. Byname students take an active<br />

part in what they see and how they see it. They are gem cutters who cut and<br />

polish, that is, facet, rough gems. Now, that is the reason why I have suggested<br />

that there are no facets without faceting. If bynames students have focused on<br />

individual facets, this is at least in part do to with the fact that «the discrete exactness<br />

of parts is more important than the supposed vagueness of the whole»<br />

(Koch 1989, p. 239). Even though I have tried to sketch a picture of the whole,<br />

I do not consider the whole more important than its parts. Instead what is being<br />

propounded here is this: Byname students need to carry out more synthesising<br />

research to view their findings less in isolation and to position the study of bynames<br />

in the system of sciences. That is the reason why I have suggested that<br />

we cannot see the whole gem if we focus on the individual facets and that, on<br />

the other hand, there is no facet without a gem. That is what coming to grips<br />

with the multifacetedness of bynames is all about.<br />

References<br />

Bach, Adolf, 1952–53: Deutsche Namenkunde 1. Die deutschen Personennamen. 2<br />

vols. 2nd ed. Heidelberg.<br />

Brendler, Silvio, 2006: Grundlagen der englischen Zunamenforschung. CD-ROM.<br />

Hamburg.<br />

— 2007: Deskriptive Konnotationen versus motivationale Konnotationen. Zu zwei zentralen<br />

Komponenten der Wortbildungssemantik der Zunamen. In: Zunamen. Zeitschrift<br />

für Namenforschung/Surnames. Journal of name studies 2. Pp. 21–43.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!