24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C h a p t e r 2 9 : T o w e r s 657<br />

But the force is nothing more than the wind pressure multiplied by the total effective<br />

projected surface area (A) of the antenna exposed to that pressure:<br />

FANT = PWIND × A<br />

(29.2)<br />

ANT<br />

The reason for the term “effective projected” is that different surface contours having<br />

the same area develop different resistance, or drag, in response to identical wind<br />

speeds. It should be obvious, for instance, that the force on a flat plate squarely facing a<br />

30 mph breeze is greater than the force on a long piece of cylindrical tubing in the same<br />

breeze. Surface areas for tower-Âmounted antennas manufactured in the United States<br />

are usually given in equivalent or effective square feet. The “e-Âword” qualifier is included<br />

because most antenna elements and booms are cylindrical and the force on them for a<br />

given wind speed is less than if they were flat plates. But read the manufacturer’s literature<br />

very carefully to be sure you understand how (or “if”) the cylindrical nature of<br />

the antenna elements and tower members has been accounted for. Common convention<br />

is to convert the actual area of one face of each cylinder into an equivalent flat plate<br />

area—often by multiplying the cylindrical surface area by 0.6—to account for the reduced<br />

drag when air flows past a cylindrical tube, as compared to a flat plate.<br />

For most types of antenna, the equivalent area that directly faces the wind varies<br />

with the wind direction (and with the compass orientation of the antenna). In general,<br />

the only number of interest is the worst case, or maximum equivalent area. For a multielement<br />

Yagi, for instance, that may occur when the beam is facing the wind or when it<br />

is broadside to the wind; most likely, however, it will occur when it is turned at some<br />

angle in between those two extremes.<br />

The “raw” pressure resulting from wind is given by:<br />

2<br />

P = K × v<br />

(29.3)<br />

WIND<br />

WIND<br />

where (in the U.S., at least) P WIND = pounds per square foot (psf)<br />

v WIND = miles per hour (mph)<br />

K = constant equal to 0.00256 when using mph and psf<br />

Of more interest to us is something called flat plate impact pressure (P FLAT ). This is the<br />

net pressure increase experienced by a flat plate squarely facing into a steady wind at a<br />

given speed (v). P FLAT is also proportional to the square of wind speed, but the constant<br />

is different from the K of Eq. (29.3) and depends on a number of geometrical characteristics—not<br />

just of the plate but of the environment around the plate. Thus, the equation<br />

for P FLAT may vary with the underlying assumptions embedded in a particular analysis.<br />

For some years, curves relating the flat plate impact pressure of flat microwave antenna<br />

panels to true wind speed often used a K FLAT = 0.004. (See Fig. 29.2.) Today the determination<br />

of the K-Âfactor to be used may be conducted on an installation-Âby-Âinstallation basis.<br />

(See the nearby Note regarding Revision G of TIA-Â222.) Nonetheless, the single most<br />

important fact to take away from Eq. (29.3) or Fig. 29.2 is that pressure on an antenna—<br />

hence, horizontal force on a tower—is directly proportional to the square of the wind<br />

speed!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!