Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586
C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v e P r o p a g a t i o n 45 Ionospheric Propagation Following on the heels of seminal discoveries by Hertz, Marconi, and other pioneering radio scientists of the late 1800s, the early 1900s found experimenters from all walks of life constructing simple radio transmitting and receiving equipment. By 1909, radio clubs had been formed at a few colleges around the United States, and by 1914 the American Radio Relay League (ARRL), dedicated to these amateur experimenters, had been founded. Commercial, government, and amateur stations shared the airwaves in willy-nilly fashion until around 1912 when the United States began to regulate radio. In those days, “good DX” might mean the ability to communicate between, say, Boston and New York City, and the prevalent assumption was that the longer wavelengths were superior for extending those distances. Forced to shift from wavelengths as long as 1000 m (well below the bottom of today’s AM broadcast band) to 200 m (roughly around 1500 kHz, near the top of the AM broadcast band) by the new regulations, amateurs grumbled a bit but dug in and went back to figuring out how to attain better and better DX distances. As the distances increased, however, the experts were finding it harder and harder to explain how it was possible. World War I brought a halt to all amateur transmissions, and when the war was over the U.S. government was inclined to keep it that way forever. But the ARRL convinced Congress and various federal agencies of the merits of radio amateurs, and in the fall of 1919 amateurs returned to the airwaves. In 1921 and again in 1922, the ARRL sponsored transatlantic receiving tests, and in both events too many stations were heard for it to be a fluke: 30 or so the first year and 10 times that number the following year! Spurred on by these encouraging results, the ARRL and others began to investigate what it would take to convert these successes into two-way communication across the ocean. Despite the almost unanimous opinion of the best scientists of the day that the shorter wavelengths would prove to be useless, some hardy experimenters plunged below 200 m and, within a year, had shown that the shorter the wavelength, the better the DX results! Textbooks and magazines of the era were rife with theories to explain these totally unexpected results. Ultimately, the “correct” theory turned out to be one originally advanced in 1901, when Arthur Kennelly of the United States and Oliver Heaviside of England independently proposed the existence of a “reflecting” layer circling the earth some miles above it. Soon named the Kennelly-Heaviside layer, it is now known as the E layer (Fig. 2.26) of the ionosphere. Thus, it is the ionosphere that makes intercontinental radio communications possible on the MF, HF, and lower VHF bands (between roughly 0.3 and 70 MHz). Included in the range of frequencies for which ionospheric propagation is possible are the AM broadcast band, many traditional maritime frequencies, amateur bands from 160 to 6 m, and the first few channels (2, 3, and 4) of the analog broadcast television spectrum. True, in some cases (especially at the upper end of the range) “possible” does not mean “probable”, but the potential is there during sunspot maxima or during brief periods of unusual solar activity. The author recalls the winter of 1957–58, when he saw firsthand a neighboring amateur make two-way contact with six continents in one evening on the 6-m band (50 MHz), using a 5-W AM transceiver and a three-element 6-m beam dangling from the I-beam running through his basement! Kennelly and Heaviside described the unseen layer as a reflecting layer; in truth, the sparseness of the ionization and the variation of ionization with altitude make
46 p a r t I I : F u n d a m e n t a l s Figure 2.26 Classification of the earth’s atmosphere for radio propagation.
- Page 12 and 13: Preface My paternal grandfather was
- Page 14 and 15: P r e f a c e xiii this book repres
- Page 16 and 17: Acknowledgments As with other field
- Page 18 and 19: Background and History Part I Chapt
- Page 20 and 21: CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Radio Com
- Page 22 and 23: C h a p t e r 1 : I n t r o d u c t
- Page 24 and 25: Fundamentals Part II Chapter 2 Radi
- Page 26 and 27: CHAPTER 2 Radio-Wave Propagation To
- Page 28 and 29: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 30 and 31: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 32 and 33: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 34 and 35: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 36 and 37: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 38 and 39: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 40 and 41: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 42 and 43: R N-1 C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o -
- Page 44 and 45: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 46 and 47: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 48 and 49: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 50 and 51: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 52 and 53: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 54 and 55: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 56 and 57: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 58 and 59: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 60 and 61: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 64 and 65: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 66 and 67: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 2.29C Monthly averaged sunsp
- Page 70 and 71: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 72 and 73: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 74 and 75: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 76 and 77: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 78 and 79: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 80 and 81: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 82 and 83: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 84 and 85: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 86 and 87: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 88 and 89: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 90 and 91: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 92 and 93: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 94 and 95: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 96 and 97: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 98 and 99: CHAPTER 3 Antenna Basics An antenna
- Page 100 and 101: C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a
- Page 102 and 103: C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a
- Page 104 and 105: C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a
- Page 106 and 107: C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a
- Page 108 and 109: C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a
- Page 110 and 111: C h a p t e r 3 : A n t e n n a B a
C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v e P r o p a g a t i o n 45<br />
Ionospheric Propagation<br />
Following on the heels of seminal discoveries by Hertz, Marconi, and other pioneering<br />
radio scientists of the late 1800s, the early 1900s found experimenters from all walks of<br />
life constructing simple radio transmitting and receiving equipment. By 1909, radio<br />
clubs had been formed at a few colleges around the United States, and by 1914 the<br />
American Radio Relay League (ARRL), dedicated to these amateur experimenters, had<br />
been founded. Commercial, government, and amateur stations shared the airwaves in<br />
willy-nilly fashion until around 1912 when the United States began to regulate radio. In<br />
those days, “good DX” might mean the ability to communicate between, say, Boston<br />
and New York City, and the prevalent assumption was that the longer wavelengths<br />
were superior for extending those distances. Forced to shift from wavelengths as long<br />
as 1000 m (well below the bottom of today’s AM broadcast band) to 200 m (roughly<br />
around 1500 kHz, near the top of the AM broadcast band) by the new regulations, amateurs<br />
grumbled a bit but dug in and went back to figuring out how to attain better and<br />
better DX distances. As the distances increased, however, the experts were finding it<br />
harder and harder to explain how it was possible.<br />
World War I brought a halt to all amateur transmissions, and when the war was<br />
over the U.S. government was inclined to keep it that way forever. But the ARRL convinced<br />
Congress and various federal agencies of the merits of radio amateurs, and in<br />
the fall of 1919 amateurs returned to the airwaves. In 1921 and again in 1922, the ARRL<br />
sponsored transatlantic receiving tests, and in both events too many stations were heard<br />
for it to be a fluke: 30 or so the first year and 10 times that number the following year!<br />
Spurred on by these encouraging results, the ARRL and others began to investigate<br />
what it would take to convert these successes into two-way communication across the<br />
ocean. Despite the almost unanimous opinion of the best scientists of the day that the<br />
shorter wavelengths would prove to be useless, some hardy experimenters plunged<br />
below 200 m and, within a year, had shown that the shorter the wavelength, the better<br />
the DX results!<br />
Textbooks and magazines of the era were rife with theories to explain these totally<br />
unexpected results. Ultimately, the “correct” theory turned out to be one originally advanced<br />
in 1901, when Arthur Kennelly of the United States and Oliver Heaviside of<br />
England independently proposed the existence of a “reflecting” layer circling the earth<br />
some miles above it. Soon named the Kennelly-Heaviside layer, it is now known as the<br />
E layer (Fig. 2.26) of the ionosphere.<br />
Thus, it is the ionosphere that makes intercontinental radio communications possible<br />
on the MF, HF, and lower VHF bands (between roughly 0.3 and 70 MHz). Included<br />
in the range of frequencies for which ionospheric propagation is possible are the AM<br />
broadcast band, many traditional maritime frequencies, amateur bands from 160 to 6 m,<br />
and the first few channels (2, 3, and 4) of the analog broadcast television spectrum. True,<br />
in some cases (especially at the upper end of the range) “possible” does not mean<br />
“probable”, but the potential is there during sunspot maxima or during brief periods of<br />
unusual solar activity. The author recalls the winter of 1957–58, when he saw firsthand<br />
a neighboring amateur make two-way contact with six continents in one evening on the<br />
6-m band (50 MHz), using a 5-W AM transceiver and a three-element 6-m beam dangling<br />
from the I-beam running through his basement!<br />
Kennelly and Heaviside described the unseen layer as a reflecting layer; in truth,<br />
the sparseness of the ionization and the variation of ionization with altitude make