Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586
544 p a r t V I I : t u n i n g , T r o u b l e s h o o t i n g , a n d D e s i g n A i d s Example 24.1 Calculate the number of turns required to make a 5-ÂmH inductor on a T-Â50-Â6 core. The A L factor for the core is 40. Solution N = 100 = 100 = 100 L A L 5 40 0.125 = (100) (0.35) = 35 Don’t take the value obtained from the equation too seriously, however, because a wide tolerance exists on amateur-Âgrade ferrite cores. Although it isn’t too much of a problem when building baluns and other transformers, it can be a concern when making fixed inductors for a tuned circuit. If the tuned circuit requires considerably more (or less) capacitance than called for in the standard equation, and all of the stray capacitance is properly taken into consideration, the actual A L value of your particular core may be different from the table value. Ferrite Rods Another form of ferrite core available on the market is the rod, shown in Fig. 24.10. Often used as a high-Âcurrent RF choke for the vacuum tube filaments of grounded-Âgrid linear amplifiers, the rod can be pressed into service as a balun, as well. Primary and secondary windings are wound in a bifilar manner over the ferrite rod. Ferrite rods are also used in receiving antennas—especially when high inductance in a small space is required. Although the amateur use is not extensive, the ferrite rod antenna (or loopstick) is popular in small receivers for MF and below, and in portable radio direction-Âfinding equipment. Some amateurs use sharp nulls of loopstick receiving antennas to null out interfering signals on the crowded HF bands. Of course, you would not want to use a small loopstick rod in a transmitting application. Ferrite rods are light enough to be suspended from their own wires or to be glued or cemented to a panel or printed circuit board inside the receiver. In place of the simple nylon screws that hold toroids in place, we can use insulating cable clamps to secure the ends of the rod to the board. A Figure 24.10 Ferrite rod inductor construction.
CHAPTER 25 Antenna Modeling Software One of the significant contributions of computer technology to the field of antennas is the availability of modeling and simulation tools that eliminate most of the drudgery associated with the complex calculations involved in analyzing and optimizing antenna designs. For most readers of this book, the best part of this is the extension of those tools to personal computers at very modest prices and even for free! Today, any individual interested in experimenting with novel antenna configurations can do so, and in the process spend little or nothing on modeling software. Modeling and simulation are used in a wide variety of applications, including management, science, and engineering. We can now model just about any process, any device, or any circuit that can be described mathematically. The purpose of modeling, at least in engineering, is to validate the design quickly and cheaply on the computer before “bending metal”. Modeling and simulation make it possible to look at alternatives and gauge the effect of a proposed design change before the change is actually implemented. The old “cut and try” method works, to be sure, but it is costly in both time and money—two resources perpetually in short supply. If performance issues and problems can be solved on a computer, then we are time and money ahead of the game. Nowhere is this more true than in the field of antennas, where each design iteration historically involved lowering the antenna from its support, adjusting its dimensions, reinstalling it many feet up in the air, and conducting a new round of test measurements. Alternatively, towers with sizeable nonconducting work platforms were utilized, and all the physical adjustments and fine-Âtuning accomplished “up topside”—in situ, as it were. A half-Âcentury ago or less, antenna test ranges with these capabilities were found only at government research centers and commercial antenna manufacturers’ facilities. Under the Hood Virtually all commonly available antenna modeling software for personal computers is based on a numerical analysis technique known as the “method of moments”, in which each wire or antenna element in the system is broken into many short segments, and the current in each segment is calculated based on the rules of electromagnetism and the boundary conditions seen by each segment. The fields generated by the antenna are determined by summing the contributions of all wire segments throughout model space, varying both azimuth and elevation angle to compute, tabulate, and graphically plot relative field strength compared to an isotropic radiator as a function of angular position from the antenna for a constant RF drive power applied to the antenna feedpoint(s). Ancillary data, including plots of voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) versus fre- 545
- Page 513 and 514: C h a p t e r 2 1 : A n t e n n a N
- Page 515 and 516: C h a p t e r 2 1 : A n t e n n a N
- Page 517 and 518: CHAPTER 22 Radio Astronomy Antennas
- Page 519 and 520: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 521 and 522: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 523 and 524: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 525 and 526: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 527 and 528: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 529 and 530: Figure 22.9 Interferometer pattern.
- Page 531 and 532: CHAPTER 23 Radio Direction-Finding
- Page 533 and 534: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 535 and 536: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 537 and 538: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 539 and 540: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 541 and 542: Figure 23.9 Adcock array RDF antenn
- Page 543 and 544: Figure 23.11 Watson-Watt Adcock arr
- Page 545 and 546: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 547 and 548: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 549 and 550: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 551 and 552: Tuning, Troubleshooting, and Design
- Page 553 and 554: CHAPTER 24 Antenna Tuners (ATUs) Th
- Page 555 and 556: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 557 and 558: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 559 and 560: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 561 and 562: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 563: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 567 and 568: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 569 and 570: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 571: Figure 25.3B Bent dipole wire and s
- Page 574 and 575: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 576 and 577: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 578 and 579: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 580 and 581: CHAPTER 26 The Smith Chart The math
- Page 582 and 583: Figure 26.2 Normalized impedance li
- Page 584 and 585: A Figure 26.3 Constant resistance c
- Page 586 and 587: A Figure 26.4A Constant inductive r
- Page 588 and 589: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 590 and 591: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 592 and 593: D C B A Figure 26.5 Radially scaled
- Page 594 and 595: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 596 and 597: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 598 and 599: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 600 and 601: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 602 and 603: 0.165 Y ' 1.0 j1.1 G' 1.0 Y ' 0.2
- Page 604 and 605: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 606 and 607: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
- Page 608 and 609: CHAPTER 27 Testing and Troubleshoot
- Page 610 and 611: C h a p t e r 2 7 : T e s t i n g a
- Page 612 and 613: C h a p t e r 2 7 : T e s t i n g a
CHAPTER 25<br />
<strong>Antenna</strong> Modeling Software<br />
One of the significant contributions of computer technology to the field of antennas<br />
is the availability of modeling and simulation tools that eliminate most of<br />
the drudgery associated with the complex calculations involved in analyzing<br />
and optimizing antenna designs. For most readers of this book, the best part of this is<br />
the extension of those tools to personal computers at very modest prices and even for<br />
free! Today, any individual interested in experimenting with novel antenna configurations<br />
can do so, and in the process spend little or nothing on modeling software.<br />
Modeling and simulation are used in a wide variety of applications, including management,<br />
science, and engineering. We can now model just about any process, any device,<br />
or any circuit that can be described mathematically. The purpose of modeling, at<br />
least in engineering, is to validate the design quickly and cheaply on the computer before<br />
“bending metal”. Modeling and simulation make it possible to look at alternatives<br />
and gauge the effect of a proposed design change before the change is actually implemented.<br />
The old “cut and try” method works, to be sure, but it is costly in both time and<br />
money—two resources perpetually in short supply. If performance issues and problems<br />
can be solved on a computer, then we are time and money ahead of the game.<br />
Nowhere is this more true than in the field of antennas, where each design iteration<br />
historically involved lowering the antenna from its support, adjusting its dimensions,<br />
reinstalling it many feet up in the air, and conducting a new round of test measurements.<br />
Alternatively, towers with sizeable nonconducting work platforms were utilized,<br />
and all the physical adjustments and fine-Âtuning accomplished “up topside”—in<br />
situ, as it were. A half-Âcentury ago or less, antenna test ranges with these capabilities<br />
were found only at government research centers and commercial antenna manufacturers’<br />
facilities.<br />
Under the Hood<br />
Virtually all commonly available antenna modeling software for personal computers is<br />
based on a numerical analysis technique known as the “method of moments”, in which<br />
each wire or antenna element in the system is broken into many short segments, and the<br />
current in each segment is calculated based on the rules of electromagnetism and the<br />
boundary conditions seen by each segment. The fields generated by the antenna are determined<br />
by summing the contributions of all wire segments throughout model space,<br />
varying both azimuth and elevation angle to compute, tabulate, and graphically plot<br />
relative field strength compared to an isotropic radiator as a function of angular position<br />
from the antenna for a constant RF drive power applied to the antenna feedpoint(s).<br />
Ancillary data, including plots of voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) versus fre-<br />
545