Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586
520 P a r t V I : A n t e n n a s f o r O t h e r F r e q u e n c i e s Shortwave and AM BCB “Skip” RDF Radio direction finding is most accurate over relatively short distances. If you have the choice, it’s better to use the ground wave (which is what you use during daylight hours for nearly all AM BCB stations). Skip rolls in on the AM BCB after local sundown, so you can hear all manner of stations up and down the dial. However, with a little practice, you can even RDF distant stations. Unfortunately, there are some practical difficulties associated with skip RDFing. When we look at propagation drawings of skip in textbooks we usually see what’s happening in a single plane at a time. Typically, a single imagined “pencil beam” radio signal is shown traveling at some angle up the ionosphere, where it is “reflected” (actually, it’s a refraction phenomenon but looks like reflection to an observer on the surface) back to earth. We can tell from the drawing that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, just like they told us in high school science classes. Unfortunately, the real world is not so neat and crisp. In the real world the skywave signal we hear is an amalgam of many such “pencil beams”, coming in from a near-infinite number of directions and elevation angles. The strongest component of such a signal aggregate is always the path that has the least total loss from start to end, but for skip distances that path is always shifting because the ionosphere that makes skip reception possible is a continuously shifting medium. A radio wave refracting through the ionosphere must feel like you and I do when taking a ride through the house of warped mirrors at an amusement park. It’s entirely possible, therefore, that at any given instant the preferred path to your antenna for a signal source located to the northwest of you might be a so-called skew path, coming in from as far around the compass rose as the southwest! Terrestrial reflections also cause problems, especially when RDFing a station in the high end of the HF band or the VHF/UHF bands. Radio waves will reflect from geological features such as mountains and from man-made structures (e.g., buildings). If the reflection is strong enough, it might appear to be the real signal and cause a severe error in RDFing. Bottom line: Be wary of RDF results on HF when the “skip is in”. Similarly, don’t let the canyons of New York City or the mountains of upstate fool you on VHF and UHF. Adcock Antennas The Adcock antenna (Fig. 23.9) has been around since 1919, when it was patented by British Royal Engineer and Lieutenant Frank Adcock as a way of overcoming the tendency of RDF loops to lose directional accuracy at nighttime. Adcock surmised that the horizontally polarized component of incoming skywave signals induced loop output voltages indicating certain spurious directions when the output voltage due to the vertically polarized ground wave was near zero. To minimize this error, Adcock designed a number of different configurations based on the use of vertical elements, both monopole and dipole. The Adcock antenna shown here once found use in the United States by the FCC at their old monitoring sites. It consists of two center-fed, nonresonant (but identical) vertical radiators. Each side of each element is at least 0.1l long, but need not be reso-
Figure 23.9 Adcock array RDF antenna. C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r e c t i o n - F i n d i n g ( R D F ) A n t e n n a s 521
- Page 489 and 490: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 491 and 492: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 493 and 494: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 495 and 496: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 497 and 498: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 499 and 500: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 501 and 502: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 503 and 504: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 505 and 506: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 507 and 508: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 509 and 510: C h a p t e r 2 0 : M i c r o w a v
- Page 511 and 512: CHAPTER 21 Antenna Noise Temperatur
- Page 513 and 514: C h a p t e r 2 1 : A n t e n n a N
- Page 515 and 516: C h a p t e r 2 1 : A n t e n n a N
- Page 517 and 518: CHAPTER 22 Radio Astronomy Antennas
- Page 519 and 520: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 521 and 522: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 523 and 524: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 525 and 526: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 527 and 528: C h a p t e r 2 2 : R a d i o A s t
- Page 529 and 530: Figure 22.9 Interferometer pattern.
- Page 531 and 532: CHAPTER 23 Radio Direction-Finding
- Page 533 and 534: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 535 and 536: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 537 and 538: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 539: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 543 and 544: Figure 23.11 Watson-Watt Adcock arr
- Page 545 and 546: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 547 and 548: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 549 and 550: C h a p t e r 2 3 : R a d i o D i r
- Page 551 and 552: Tuning, Troubleshooting, and Design
- Page 553 and 554: CHAPTER 24 Antenna Tuners (ATUs) Th
- Page 555 and 556: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 557 and 558: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 559 and 560: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 561 and 562: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 563 and 564: C h a p t e r 2 4 : a n t e n n a T
- Page 565 and 566: CHAPTER 25 Antenna Modeling Softwar
- Page 567 and 568: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 569 and 570: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 571: Figure 25.3B Bent dipole wire and s
- Page 574 and 575: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 576 and 577: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 578 and 579: C h a p t e r 2 5 : A n t e n n a M
- Page 580 and 581: CHAPTER 26 The Smith Chart The math
- Page 582 and 583: Figure 26.2 Normalized impedance li
- Page 584 and 585: A Figure 26.3 Constant resistance c
- Page 586 and 587: A Figure 26.4A Constant inductive r
- Page 588 and 589: C h a p t e r 2 6 : T h e S m i t h
520 P a r t V I : A n t e n n a s f o r O t h e r F r e q u e n c i e s<br />
Shortwave and AM BCB “Skip” RDF<br />
Radio direction finding is most accurate over relatively short distances. If you have the<br />
choice, it’s better to use the ground wave (which is what you use during daylight hours<br />
for nearly all AM BCB stations). Skip rolls in on the AM BCB after local sundown, so<br />
you can hear all manner of stations up and down the dial. However, with a little practice,<br />
you can even RDF distant stations.<br />
Unfortunately, there are some practical difficulties associated with skip RDFing.<br />
When we look at propagation drawings of skip in textbooks we usually see what’s happening<br />
in a single plane at a time. Typically, a single imagined “pencil beam” radio<br />
signal is shown traveling at some angle up the ionosphere, where it is “reflected” (actually,<br />
it’s a refraction phenomenon but looks like reflection to an observer on the surface)<br />
back to earth. We can tell from the drawing that the angle of incidence equals the angle<br />
of reflection, just like they told us in high school science classes. Unfortunately, the real<br />
world is not so neat and crisp.<br />
In the real world the skywave signal we hear is an amalgam of many such “pencil<br />
beams”, coming in from a near-infinite number of directions and elevation angles. The<br />
strongest component of such a signal aggregate is always the path that has the least<br />
total loss from start to end, but for skip distances that path is always shifting because<br />
the ionosphere that makes skip reception possible is a continuously shifting medium. A<br />
radio wave refracting through the ionosphere must feel like you and I do when taking<br />
a ride through the house of warped mirrors at an amusement park. It’s entirely possible,<br />
therefore, that at any given instant the preferred path to your antenna for a signal<br />
source located to the northwest of you might be a so-called skew path, coming in from<br />
as far around the compass rose as the southwest!<br />
Terrestrial reflections also cause problems, especially when RDFing a station in the<br />
high end of the HF band or the VHF/UHF bands. Radio waves will reflect from geological<br />
features such as mountains and from man-made structures (e.g., buildings). If<br />
the reflection is strong enough, it might appear to be the real signal and cause a severe<br />
error in RDFing.<br />
Bottom line: Be wary of RDF results on HF when the “skip is in”. Similarly, don’t<br />
let the canyons of New York City or the mountains of upstate fool you on VHF and<br />
UHF.<br />
Adcock <strong>Antenna</strong>s<br />
The Adcock antenna (Fig. 23.9) has been around since 1919, when it was patented by<br />
British Royal Engineer and Lieutenant Frank Adcock as a way of overcoming the tendency<br />
of RDF loops to lose directional accuracy at nighttime. Adcock surmised that the<br />
horizontally polarized component of incoming skywave signals induced loop output<br />
voltages indicating certain spurious directions when the output voltage due to the vertically<br />
polarized ground wave was near zero. To minimize this error, Adcock designed<br />
a number of different configurations based on the use of vertical elements, both monopole<br />
and dipole.<br />
The Adcock antenna shown here once found use in the United States by the FCC<br />
at their old monitoring sites. It consists of two center-fed, nonresonant (but identical)<br />
vertical radiators. Each side of each element is at least 0.1l long, but need not be reso-