Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

24.07.2018 Views

410 p a r t V I : a n t e n n a s f o r O t h e r F r e q u e n c i e s Figure 18.3 Gamma-matching a grounded vertical tower antenna. h element 20-m monobander with a 32-ft boom and full-size elements approximately 36 ft long. Above that, at the 98-ft level, is a two-element 40-m “shorty 40” monobander with a 20-ft boom and shortened (linear-loaded) elements about 42 ft long. All elements of both beams are directly Gamma rod grounded to their respective booms. The tower is well grounded at its base, and approximately 16 radials of varying length extend outward in all s compass directions. Of course, all guy wires have their uppermost insulators located 3 ft or less from their C Coax to XMTR respective attachment points to the tower. Since a 98-ft tower is a substantial percentage (70 percent) of a quarter-wave on 160 m, the capacitive top loading provided by the two beams should easily bring the total electrical height to more than 90 degrees—that is, to an equivalent height of more than 135 ft at 1.8 MHz. Initial experiments with attempting to find the “right” gamma rod tap point, using a fixed spacing of 2 ft from the tower, were frustrating; dozens of trips up the tower by the owner to heights ranging between 25 and 65 ft to adjust the gamma rod tap point had resulted only in establishing a very sharp resonance (narrow bandwidth) that was very difficult to reliably tune with the transmitting air variables on hand and that could never quite be tuned to a perfect 1.0:1 VSWR with either a simple gamma capacitor or the more complicated omega match. The owner then turned to EZNEC antenna modeling software from W7EL to model the combined effect of his tower, gamma rod, and HF monoband beams on 160 m. The most time-consuming part of this was in creating accurate models of the two beams, although simplified models would probably have been quite adequate for determining their capacitive loading effect on 160 m. The results were eye-opening! Instead of using a gamma rod spaced 2 ft from the nearest edge of the triangular tower, the model suggested that a spacing of between 6 and 8 ft in combination with a tap point of about 57 ft would optimize bandwidth at the desired center frequency while developing a feedpoint impedance very close to 50 Ω resistive with a small amount of inductive reactance deliberately introduced to allow fine-tuning of the VSWR on the feedline with a single air-variable transmitting capacitor at the base. Here is what the owner finally installed: • An 8-ft length of sturdy aluminum angle stock from a local hardware store supports the gamma rod (which is made from lengths of copper plumbing

C h a p t e r 1 8 : a n t e n n a s f o r 1 6 0 M e t e r s 411 Yagi antennas I I Guy wires I I Conducting spacer I I Gamma rod I I Insulating spacers To feedline Radials Grounding ring Figure 18.4 Top-loaded 90-ft tower.

410 p a r t V I : a n t e n n a s f o r O t h e r F r e q u e n c i e s<br />

Figure 18.3 Gamma-matching a grounded<br />

vertical tower antenna.<br />

h<br />

element 20-m monobander with a<br />

32-ft boom and full-size elements approximately<br />

36 ft long. Above that, at<br />

the 98-ft level, is a two-element 40-m<br />

“shorty 40” monobander with a 20-ft<br />

boom and shortened (linear-loaded)<br />

elements about 42 ft long. All elements<br />

of both beams are directly<br />

Gamma rod<br />

grounded to their respective booms.<br />

The tower is well grounded at its<br />

base, and approximately 16 radials of<br />

varying length extend outward in all<br />

s<br />

compass directions. Of course, all<br />

guy wires have their uppermost insulators<br />

located 3 ft or less from their<br />

C<br />

Coax to XMTR<br />

respective attachment points to the<br />

tower. Since a 98-ft tower is a substantial<br />

percentage (70 percent) of a<br />

quarter-wave on 160 m, the capacitive<br />

top loading provided by the two<br />

beams should easily bring the total electrical height to more than 90 degrees—that is, to<br />

an equivalent height of more than 135 ft at 1.8 MHz.<br />

Initial experiments with attempting to find the “right” gamma rod tap point, using<br />

a fixed spacing of 2 ft from the tower, were frustrating; dozens of trips up the tower by<br />

the owner to heights ranging between 25 and 65 ft to adjust the gamma rod tap point<br />

had resulted only in establishing a very sharp resonance (narrow bandwidth) that was<br />

very difficult to reliably tune with the transmitting air variables on hand and that could<br />

never quite be tuned to a perfect 1.0:1 VSWR with either a simple gamma capacitor or<br />

the more complicated omega match.<br />

The owner then turned to EZNEC antenna modeling software from W7EL to model<br />

the combined effect of his tower, gamma rod, and HF monoband beams on 160 m. The<br />

most time-consuming part of this was in creating accurate models of the two beams,<br />

although simplified models would probably have been quite adequate for determining<br />

their capacitive loading effect on 160 m.<br />

The results were eye-opening! Instead of using a gamma rod spaced 2 ft from the<br />

nearest edge of the triangular tower, the model suggested that a spacing of between 6<br />

and 8 ft in combination with a tap point of about 57 ft would optimize bandwidth at the<br />

desired center frequency while developing a feedpoint impedance very close to 50 Ω<br />

resistive with a small amount of inductive reactance deliberately introduced to allow<br />

fine-tuning of the VSWR on the feedline with a single air-variable transmitting capacitor<br />

at the base.<br />

Here is what the owner finally installed:<br />

• An 8-ft length of sturdy aluminum angle stock from a local hardware store<br />

supports the gamma rod (which is made from lengths of copper plumbing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!