24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 18<br />

<strong>Antenna</strong>s for 160 Meters<br />

One of the most explosive growth areas of amateur radio interest worldwide in<br />

the past decade has been the 160-m band. Topband, as it is called by its aficionados,<br />

presents today’s active amateur with extreme technical and operational<br />

challenges and opportunities. Part of this comes from the physical dimensions required<br />

for efficient antennas, part from the high noise levels often found at these low frequencies,<br />

and part from the fact that there are aspects of 160-m propagation that remain an<br />

enigma to even the experts.<br />

Efficient transmitting antennas for the medium-frequency band (300 kHZ to 3 MHz)<br />

pose certain difficulties for the user. Of course, the first thing that springs to mind is the<br />

large size of those antennas. As explained in earlier chapters, the most efficient transmitting<br />

antennas for the MF and HF bands approach a half-wavelength (horizontal dipoles)<br />

or a quarter-wavelength (vertical monopoles) in their long dimension. For<br />

instance, a half-wavelength dipole for 160 m is about 270 ft long, usually exceeding the<br />

capabilities of a typical suburban lot. Of course, as the frequency decreases, a halfwavelength<br />

increases, so it is not for nothing that towers for the AM broadcast band<br />

(530 to 1700 kHz, just below the 160-m band) are usually hundreds of feet tall.<br />

Vertical Monopoles<br />

For the amateur blessed with lots of real estate, a generous budget, and no zoning<br />

limitations, the transmit antenna of choice for 160 borrows from the best engineering<br />

practices of the AM broadcast industry; it is almost always one or more l/4 groundmounted<br />

verticals with anywhere from 12 to 60 radials originating at the base of each<br />

tower.<br />

But AM broadcast stations are usually concerned with maximizing their ground-wave<br />

signal strength throughout their own local metropolitan area. Why would Âamateurs—<br />

especially those interested in very long distance communication—adopt broadcast station<br />

techniques? Why, for instance, wouldn’t a l/2 dipole for 160 m be a better choice?<br />

There are at least two reasons:<br />

• To radiate well at the low elevation angles that are most useful for long-haul<br />

communications, a horizontally polarized antenna should be at least a halfwavelength<br />

above ground. On 160 m, this suggests a minimum height of nearly<br />

300 ft for the antenna supports!<br />

• Although a low dipole will normally provide acceptable nighttime coverage on<br />

160 m throughout a radius of a few hundred miles around the antenna, sunlight<br />

401

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!