Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586
332 p a r t V : h i g h - F r e q u e n c y A n t e n n a s f o r S p e c i a l i z e d U s e s ability to copy weak signals in the presence of signal fading (QSB), ionospheric skew paths, and/or polarization shift. Spurred by accelerating worldwide interest in the 160-m band as long range navigation (LORAN) systems were decommissioned and frequencies became available to amateurs, the decade following publication of the fourth edition of this handbook has been a fertile period for development of receiving antennas for that band. Thanks in large measure to the use of the Internet to rapidly disseminate new design concepts and experimental results, “folklore” about antenna performance has largely been replaced with a solid body of good science. Today the low-band receiving enthusiast—whether radio amateur, broadcast band listener, or shortwave listener—has available an arsenal of antenna types to enhance his/her receiving capabilities. They include: • Beverage and Snake • Multiturn loop • EWE • K9AY loop • Pennant • Flag • Short verticals • Longwires Many of these antenna types are employed not only singly but often in phased configurations with duplicates of themselves. Some of these antennas cannot be analyzed by viewing them as derivations of the half-wave dipole. All except the longwire are generally unsuitable for transmitting purposes for multiple reasons: • Low radiation resistance (difficult to match) • Very low efficiency • Easily destroyed by even modest power levels Because of their inefficiency, these antennas generally present a signal level to the receiver input terminals that is anywhere from 10 to 40 dB below signal levels typically delivered by a transmit antenna during receiving periods. But because the atmospheric noise level at MF and lower HF frequencies is so high, receiver sensitivity, per se, is seldom an issue and preamplifiers are only occasionally required. Beverage or “Wave” Antenna The Beverage or wave antenna is considered by many people to be the best receiving antenna available for very low frequency (VLF), AM broadcast band (BCB), mediumwave (MW or MF), or tropical band (low HF region) DXing. In 1921, Paul Godley, who held the U.S. call sign 1ZE, journeyed to Scotland under sponsorship of the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) to erect a receiving station at Androssan. His mission was to listen for amateur radio signals from North America. As a result of politicking in the post–World War I era, hams had been consigned to the sup-
C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n g A n t e n n a s f o r H i g h F r e q u e n c y 333 posedly useless shortwaves (l < 200 m), and it was not clear that reliable international communication was possible. Godley went to Scotland to see if that could happen; he reportedly used a wave antenna (today, called the Beverage) for the task. (And, yes, he was successful—23 North American amateur stations were heard! As the cover of QST, the monthly journal of the ARRL, for March 1922 trumpeted, “We got across!!!”) The Beverage was used by RCA at its Riverhead, Long Island (New York), station in 1922, and a technical description by Dr. H. H. Beverage (for whom it is named) appeared in QST for November 1922, in an article entitled “The Wave Antenna for 200- Meter Reception”. It then virtually disappeared from popular view for decades as amateurs, military, and commercial services moved higher and higher in frequency, until removal of LORAN restrictions on the 160-m band by the United States and other countries in the 1960s and 1970s caused an upswing of interest in DXing on that band. In 1984, an edited and updated version of the 1922 QST article reintroduced active amateurs to the merits of the antenna. The Beverage is a terminated longwire antenna, usually greater than one wavelength (Fig. 14.1), although some authorities and many users (including the author) maintain that lengths as short as l/2 can be worthwhile. The Beverage provides good directivity but is not very efficient—in part because roughly half of the received energy is dissipated in a termination resistor at one end. As a result, it is seldom used for transmitting. (This is an example of how different attributes of various antennas make the law of reciprocity a sometimes unreliable guide to antenna selection.) Unlike the regular longwire discussed in another chapter as a multiband transmitting antenna, the Beverage is intended to be mounted close to the earth’s surface (typically < 0.1l); heights of 8 to 10 ft are most commonly employed so that two- and four-footed mammals are less apt to run into the wire, but lower heights may have the advantage of minimizing stray pickup from the vertical “drop” wire at either end. At greater heights, the Beverage loses its relationship to the (lossy) ground beneath it and its pattern becomes more and more that of a traditional end-fed terminated wire. Longwire (0.5) Direction of maximum signal To receiver T 1 Primary winding 8 to 10 ft R Radials Secondary T 1 is winding 1:3 turns ratio (1:9 impedance ratio) Figure 14.1 Beverage antenna.
- Page 299 and 300: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 301 and 302: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 303 and 304: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 305 and 306: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 307 and 308: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 309 and 310: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 311 and 312: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 313 and 314: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 315 and 316: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 317 and 318: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 319 and 320: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 321 and 322: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 323 and 324: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 325 and 326: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 327 and 328: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 329 and 330: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 331 and 332: C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i -
- Page 333 and 334: CHAPTER 13 Cubical Quads and Delta
- Page 335 and 336: C h a p t e r 1 3 : C u b i c a l Q
- Page 337 and 338: C h a p t e r 1 3 : C u b i c a l Q
- Page 339 and 340: C h a p t e r 1 3 : C u b i c a l Q
- Page 341 and 342: Figure 13.5 Multiband quad “spide
- Page 343 and 344: C h a p t e r 1 3 : C u b i c a l Q
- Page 345 and 346: C h a p t e r 1 3 : C u b i c a l Q
- Page 347 and 348: High-Frequency Antennas for Special
- Page 349: CHAPTER 14 Receiving Antennas for H
- Page 353 and 354: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 355 and 356: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 357 and 358: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 359 and 360: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 361 and 362: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 363 and 364: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 365 and 366: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 367 and 368: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 369: 351 Figure 14.12 Remote tuning sche
- Page 372 and 373: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 374 and 375: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 377 and 378: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 379 and 380: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 381 and 382: C h a p t e r 1 4 : r e c e i v i n
- Page 383 and 384: CHAPTER 15 Hidden and Limited-Space
- Page 385 and 386: C h a p t e r 1 5 : H i d d e n a n
- Page 387 and 388: C h a p t e r 1 5 : H i d d e n a n
- Page 389 and 390: C h a p t e r 1 5 : H i d d e n a n
- Page 391 and 392: C h a p t e r 1 5 : H i d d e n a n
- Page 393 and 394: C h a p t e r 1 5 : H i d d e n a n
- Page 395 and 396: CHAPTER 16 Mobile and Marine Antenn
- Page 397 and 398: C h a p t e r 1 6 : M o b i l e a n
- Page 399 and 400: C h a p t e r 1 6 : M o b i l e a n
332 p a r t V : h i g h - F r e q u e n c y A n t e n n a s f o r S p e c i a l i z e d U s e s<br />
ability to copy weak signals in the presence of signal fading (QSB), ionospheric<br />
skew paths, and/or polarization shift.<br />
Spurred by accelerating worldwide interest in the 160-m band as long range navigation<br />
(LORAN) systems were decommissioned and frequencies became available to amateurs,<br />
the decade following publication of the fourth edition of this handbook has been<br />
a fertile period for development of receiving antennas for that band. Thanks in large<br />
measure to the use of the Internet to rapidly disseminate new design concepts and experimental<br />
results, “folklore” about antenna performance has largely been replaced<br />
with a solid body of good science. Today the low-band receiving enthusiast—whether<br />
radio amateur, broadcast band listener, or shortwave listener—has available an arsenal<br />
of antenna types to enhance his/her receiving capabilities. They include:<br />
• Beverage and Snake<br />
• Multiturn loop<br />
• EWE<br />
• K9AY loop<br />
• Pennant<br />
• Flag<br />
• Short verticals<br />
• Longwires<br />
Many of these antenna types are employed not only singly but often in phased configurations<br />
with duplicates of themselves. Some of these antennas cannot be analyzed<br />
by viewing them as derivations of the half-wave dipole. All except the longwire are<br />
generally unsuitable for transmitting purposes for multiple reasons:<br />
• Low radiation resistance (difficult to match)<br />
• Very low efficiency<br />
• Easily destroyed by even modest power levels<br />
Because of their inefficiency, these antennas generally present a signal level to the<br />
receiver input terminals that is anywhere from 10 to 40 dB below signal levels typically<br />
delivered by a transmit antenna during receiving periods. But because the atmospheric<br />
noise level at MF and lower HF frequencies is so high, receiver sensitivity, per se, is<br />
seldom an issue and preamplifiers are only occasionally required.<br />
Beverage or “Wave” <strong>Antenna</strong><br />
The Beverage or wave antenna is considered by many people to be the best receiving antenna<br />
available for very low frequency (VLF), AM broadcast band (BCB), mediumwave<br />
(MW or MF), or tropical band (low HF region) DXing.<br />
In 1921, Paul Godley, who held the U.S. call sign 1ZE, journeyed to Scotland under<br />
sponsorship of the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) to erect a receiving station at<br />
Androssan. His mission was to listen for amateur radio signals from North America. As<br />
a result of politicking in the post–World War I era, hams had been consigned to the sup-