Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586
C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v e P r o p a g a t i o n 17 distributed over an area (B) that is four times as large as area A. Thus, the power density falls off according to 1/d 2 , where d is the distance from the source. This is called the inverse square law. An advancing wave can experience additional reductions in amplitude when it passes through matter. In this case, true dissipative attenuation may indeed occur. For instance, at some very high microwave frequencies there is additional path loss as a result of the oxygen and water vapor content of the air surrounding our globe. At other frequencies, losses originating in other materials can be found. These effects are highly dependent on the relationship of molecular distances to the wavelength of the incident wave. For many frequencies of interest, the effect is extremely small, and we can pretend radio waves in our own atmosphere behave almost as though they were in the vacuum of free space. Many materials, such as wood, that are opaque throughout the spectrum of visible light are fundamentally transparent at most, if not all, radio frequencies. Isotropic Sources In dealing with both antenna theory and radio-wave propagation, a totally fictitious device called an isotropic source (or isotropic radiator) is sometimes used for the sake of comparison, and for simpler arithmetic. You will see the isotropic model mentioned several places in this book. An isotropic source is a very tiny spherical source that radiates energy equally well in all directions. The radiation pattern is thus a perfect sphere with the isotropic antenna at the center. Because such a spherical source generates uniform output in all directions, and its geometry is easily determined mathematically, the signal intensities at all points can be calculated from basic geometric principles. Just don’t forget: Despite all its advantages, there is no such thing in real life as an isotropic source! For the isotropic case, the average power in the extended sphere is Pt = (2.6) 4π d P av 2 where P av = average power per unit area on surface of spherical wavefront P t = total power radiated by source d = radius of sphere in meters (i.e., distance from radiator to point in question) The effective aperture (A e ) of a receiving antenna is a measure of its ability to collect power from the EM wave and deliver it to the load. Although typically smaller than the surface area of a real antenna, for the theoretical isotropic case, A e = l 2 /4π. The power delivered to the load is then the incident power density times the effective collecting area of the receiving isotropic antenna, or P = P A (2.7) L By combining Eqs. (2.6) and (2.7), the power delivered to a load at distance d is given by av e Pl 2 t L = (4π) 2 2 d P (2.8)
18 p a r t I I : F u n d a m e n t a l s where P L = power to load l = wavelength (c/f ) of signal From these expressions, we can then derive an expression for ordinary free-space path losses between an isotropic transmitter antenna and a receiver antenna (see App. A for an explanation of logarithms): ⎛ P ⎞ t L = 10 log ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ P ⎠ or, by rearranging to account for individual terms: L = [20log d] + [20log F] + k (2.10) L (2.9) where L = path loss in decibels (dB) d = path length F = frequency in megahertz (MHz) k is a constant that depends on the units of d as follows: k = 32.4 if d in kilometers = 36.58 if d in statute miles = 37.80 if d in nautical miles = –37.87 if d in feet = –27.55 if d in meters The radiated sphere of energy gets ever larger as the wave propagates away from the isotropic source. At a great distance from the center, a small slice of the advancing wavefront is essentially a flat plane, as in Fig. 2.5. (This situation is analogous to the apparent flatness of the prairie in the midwestern United States, even though the surface of the earth is really spherical.) If you could see the electric and magnetic field vectors, they would appear to be at right angles to each other in the flat-plane wavefront. The polarization of an EM wave is, by definition, the direction or orientation of the electric field with respect to some agreed-upon reference. In most cases, the reference is the earth’s surface, although that may well be meaningless for antennas in outer space. In Figure 2.5 A spherical wavefront far from the source can be treated as a plane wave with E- and H-fields at right angles to each other.
- Page 2 and 3: Practical Antenna Handbook
- Page 4 and 5: Practical Antenna Handbook Joseph J
- Page 6 and 7: Contents Preface . . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9: C o n t e n t s vii 12 The Yagi-Uda
- Page 10 and 11: C o n t e n t s ix Switched-Pattern
- Page 12 and 13: Preface My paternal grandfather was
- Page 14 and 15: P r e f a c e xiii this book repres
- Page 16 and 17: Acknowledgments As with other field
- Page 18 and 19: Background and History Part I Chapt
- Page 20 and 21: CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Radio Com
- Page 22 and 23: C h a p t e r 1 : I n t r o d u c t
- Page 24 and 25: Fundamentals Part II Chapter 2 Radi
- Page 26 and 27: CHAPTER 2 Radio-Wave Propagation To
- Page 28 and 29: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 30 and 31: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 32 and 33: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 36 and 37: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 38 and 39: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 40 and 41: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 42 and 43: R N-1 C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o -
- Page 44 and 45: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 46 and 47: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 48 and 49: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 50 and 51: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 52 and 53: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 54 and 55: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 56 and 57: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 58 and 59: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 60 and 61: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 62 and 63: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 64 and 65: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 66 and 67: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 2.29C Monthly averaged sunsp
- Page 70 and 71: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 72 and 73: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 74 and 75: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 76 and 77: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 78 and 79: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 80 and 81: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
- Page 82 and 83: C h a p t e r 2 : r a d i o - W a v
18 p a r t I I : F u n d a m e n t a l s<br />
where<br />
P L = power to load<br />
l = wavelength (c/f ) of signal<br />
From these expressions, we can then derive an expression for ordinary free-space path<br />
losses between an isotropic transmitter antenna and a receiver antenna (see App. A for<br />
an explanation of logarithms):<br />
⎛ P ⎞<br />
t<br />
L = 10 log ⎜ ⎟<br />
⎝ P ⎠<br />
or, by rearranging to account for individual terms:<br />
L = [20log d] + [20log F] + k<br />
(2.10)<br />
L<br />
(2.9)<br />
where L = path loss in decibels (dB)<br />
d = path length<br />
F = frequency in megahertz (MHz)<br />
k is a constant that depends on the units of d as follows:<br />
k = 32.4 if d in kilometers<br />
= 36.58 if d in statute miles<br />
= 37.80 if d in nautical miles<br />
= –37.87 if d in feet<br />
= –27.55 if d in meters<br />
The radiated sphere of energy gets ever larger as the wave propagates away from<br />
the isotropic source. At a great distance from the center, a small slice of the advancing<br />
wavefront is essentially a flat plane, as in Fig. 2.5. (This situation is analogous to the<br />
apparent flatness of the prairie in the<br />
midwestern United States, even though<br />
the surface of the earth is really spherical.)<br />
If you could see the electric and<br />
magnetic field vectors, they would appear<br />
to be at right angles to each other<br />
in the flat-plane wavefront.<br />
The polarization of an EM wave is,<br />
by definition, the direction or orientation<br />
of the electric field with respect to<br />
some agreed-upon reference. In most<br />
cases, the reference is the earth’s surface,<br />
although that may well be meaningless<br />
for antennas in outer space. In<br />
Figure 2.5 A spherical wavefront far from the<br />
source can be treated as a plane wave with E-<br />
and H-fields at right angles to each other.