24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i - U d a B e a m A n t e n n a 311<br />

the total gain at any given elevation and azimuth relative to some reference antenna,<br />

whether dipole or isotropic radiator, is the pattern of the antenna multiplied by the<br />

array pattern. In this case, the array pattern is formed in conjunction with the image Yagi<br />

located an equal distance beneath the ground; thus, the patterns of these two figures are<br />

those of a three-element Yagi multiplied by the ground reflection pattern for that specific<br />

antenna height. The peak boost provided by the ground reflection pattern over<br />

perfectly conducting ground would be 6 dB, occurring at an elevation angle that depends<br />

on the Yagi’s height above ground; in general, the gain is somewhat less over real<br />

ground.)<br />

Which antenna height is better? Certainly for very long distance communication,<br />

the upper Yagi has the benefit of slightly higher gain and noticeably lower takeoff angle<br />

for its main lobe. But at midday on the HF bands, the lower Yagi might well be the superior<br />

performer as DX signals shift to higher takeoff and arrival angles, especially if<br />

both stations involved in the communications are in North America, are in Europe, or<br />

even are attempting to communicate between eastern North America and western Europe.<br />

In particular, the lower Yagi is near the peak of its response curve at elevations<br />

around 30 degrees, where the upper Yagi has a deep null. The depth of the null will<br />

depend on the actual nature of the ground within a few wavelengths from the base of<br />

the tower (for flat terrain). Which antenna height is better? It depends. At one time or<br />

another, either one is better.<br />

Now that we have pattern data for the two antennas, let’s look at Fig. 12.10B to examine<br />

the effects of splitting our transmitter power between them by feeding them in<br />

phase (BIP) and out of phase (BOP). Here’s what we observe:<br />

• The peak of the broken curve (BIP) in Fig. 12.10B is 13.2 dBd, or 1.3 dB higher<br />

than the peak gain of the high Yagi of Fig. 12.10A. This stacking gain is less<br />

than the theoretical maximum of 3 dB because of the close spacings and because<br />

3 dB can be attained only when the vertical elevation patterns of the two<br />

beams are identical (as in free space). Nonetheless, there are many communications<br />

scenarios when an extra 1.3 dB means the difference between success<br />

and failure.<br />

• The elevation angle of the BIP main lobe (14 degrees) is the same as that of the<br />

upper beam alone.<br />

• Feeding the two beams out of phase (BOP, solid line) creates a single main lobe<br />

similar to the main lobe of the lower Yagi alone but enhanced with 1.3 dB<br />

stacking gain and centered on a higher elevation angle (42 versus 24 degrees).<br />

As a typical day on the HF bands progresses, one might reasonably expect to<br />

progress from BIP through Lower to BOP on most transoceanic paths. Upper<br />

would be useful primarily for very long haul links at those installations where<br />

the lower beam was fixed on a different azimuthal heading and not able to<br />

contribute to forming the BIP pattern.<br />

• Although the apparent benefit of stacking beams at l/2 and l above ground is<br />

“only” 1.3 dB compared to the peak pattern response of the upper beam alone,<br />

there are other benefits to stacking. BIP and BOP allow us to double the number<br />

of elevation angle ranges we can select with two beams. And often more<br />

important than stacking gain is the reduction in interference that comes from<br />

eliminating the secondary (upper) lobe of the higher Yagi by using BIP mode.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!