24.07.2018 Views

Practical_Antenna_Handbook_0071639586

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C h a p t e r 1 2 : T h e Y a g i - U d a B e a m A n t e n n a 309<br />

limited range. In an even simpler configuration, one or more lower beams can be fixed<br />

in position by being mounted directly to sides of the tower at the appropriate height(s).<br />

A DXer or contester in the northeastern United States might, for instance, attach beams<br />

aimed at 45 degrees (to maximize coverage into Europe) and 135 degrees (for South<br />

America and the southern half of Africa) directly to the tower at points roughly a wavelength<br />

below the top beam.<br />

In practice, stack spacings on a guyed tower will be determined as much by guy<br />

wire attachment heights and element clearance distances as by any theoretical projections<br />

of stacking gain versus spacing. Luckily, exact stack spacing (stacking distance) is<br />

not critical.<br />

Because the optimum stack spacing is expressed in terms of the number of wavelengths<br />

between the top and bottom beams in the stack, one might conclude that only<br />

monoband beams can be stacked with good results. That isn’t true. Because the stacking<br />

gain curve exhibits such a broad peak as a function of spacing, multiband beams covering<br />

a 2:1 frequency span can be spaced as much as 3l/4 apart at the lowest frequency of<br />

operation, corresponding to a spacing of 3l/2 at the highest frequency. Thus, amateur<br />

HF tribanders or five-banders (when the 12- and 17-m WARC bands are included) covering<br />

a 2:1 frequency span can be stacked with very competitive results.<br />

The normal assumption with stacking is that the feedline configuration to each beam<br />

in the stack is identical in length and impedance—a “T” connection, in other words, as<br />

shown in Fig. 12.9—thus applying roughly equal transmitter power in phase to the two<br />

Yagis. Enterprising HF DXers and contesters have found, however, that a useful adjunct<br />

to the two-beam stack is a coaxial cable relay control box with a four-position switch and<br />

associated transmission line phasing sections that allow the user to select beams in phase<br />

(BIP), beams (180 degrees) out of phase (BOP), upper beam only, or lower beam only. All of<br />

these choices are useful at one time or<br />

another not only because we are usually<br />

interested in communicating over a<br />

wide range of distances but also because<br />

Upper<br />

feedline<br />

Relay<br />

switching<br />

Lower<br />

feedline<br />

To station<br />

/2 to 3<br />

2<br />

/2<br />

Upper & lower feedlines should be exactly<br />

the same length, measured from antenna feedpoint<br />

to switch box.<br />

h<br />

the optimum elevation angle for HF ionospheric<br />

communications is always<br />

varying.<br />

One advantage to using one or more<br />

fixed lower beams or having the upper<br />

and lower beams independently rotatable<br />

is that transmitter power (and receiving<br />

capability) can be split between<br />

two different directions at the same<br />

time. Thus, if looking to establish communications<br />

with two different parts of<br />

the world, the upper beam might be rotated<br />

in the direction of one continent<br />

while the lower beam is aimed at another.<br />

Figures 12.10 and 12.11, provided by<br />

W. L. Myers, K1GQ, are plots of antenna<br />

Figure 12.9 Feeding stacked Yagi antennas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!